| Literature DB >> 27145459 |
Tobias M Gorges1, Sabine Riethdorf1, Oliver von Ahsen2, Paulina Nastał Y1, Katharina Röck1, Marcel Boede3, Sven Peine4, Andra Kuske1, Elke Schmid2, Christoph Kneip2, Frank König3, Marion Rudolph2, Klaus Pantel1.
Abstract
The prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is the only clinically validated marker for therapeutic decisions in prostate cancer (PC). Characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) obtained from the peripheral blood of PC patients might provide an alternative to tissue biopsies called "liquid biopsy". The aim of this study was to develop a reliable assay for the determination of PSMA on CTCs. PSMA expression was analyzed on tissue samples (cohort one, n = 75) and CTCs from metastatic PC patients (cohort two, n = 29). Specific signals for the expression of PSMA could be seen for different prostate cancer cell line cells (PC3, LaPC4, 22Rv1, and LNCaP) by Western blot, immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunocytochemistry (ICC), and FACS. PSMA expression was found to be significantly increased in patients with higher Gleason grade (p = 0.0011) and metastases in lymph nodes (p = 0.0000085) or bone (p = 0.0020) (cohort one). In cohort two, CTCs were detectable in 20 out of 29 samples (69 %, range from 1 - 1000 cells). Twelve out of 20 CTC-positive patients showed PSMA-positive CTCs (67 %, score 1+ to 3+). We found intra-patient heterogeneity regarding the PSMA status between CTCs and the corresponding primary tumors. The results of our study could help to address the question whether treatment decisions based on CTC PSMA profiling will lead to a measurable benefit in clinical outcome for prostate cancer patients in the near future.Entities:
Keywords: CellSearch®; PSMA; circulating tumor cells; prostate cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27145459 PMCID: PMC5085200 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1PSMA expression analyses of different prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, 22Rv1, LaPC4, and PC-3) by Western blot (A) or immunohistochemistry (B)
Figure 2PSMA expression analyses of different prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, LaPC4, 22Rv1, and PC-3) by flow cytometry
Samples were non-fixed or treated with CellSearch® fixative for 24 hours at room temperature before permeabilization and staining.
Figure 3A. Immunostaining for PSMA and pan-keratin comparing different prostate cancer cell line cells (LNCap, 22Rv1, and PC-3). DAPI was used for nuclear counterstainings. Different concentrations of the PSMA BioLegend antibody (clone LNI-17) were applied (40 - 60 μg / mL). B. Detection of PSMA expression on tumor cells (LNCaP, 22Rv1, and PC-3) spiked into 7.5 mL of healthy donors blood by the CellSearch® system.
Figure 4Precision, accuracy, and validity of the CellSearch®-PSMA assay
Blood from one donor was used, and transferred into CellSave® preservation tubes. Cells of the LNCaP line were spiked into blood by dilution series. Two samples were processed in parallel at day one (samples 1_1 to 1_2) in the same batch / run and two samples (2_4 and 2_5) were processed at day two. Samples 2_4 and 2_5 were stored at room temperature until analysis.
Figure 5A and B. Tissue micro array (TMA) analyses from 75 prostate cancer patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (n = 15), gleason score 5 - 7 (n = 15), gleason score 8 - 10 (n = 15), and patients with bone (BM) or lymph node (LN) metastases (n = 15 each). C. Representative images of circulating tumor cells detected by CellSearch® with different signal intensities for PSMA (score 0 - 3+).
Patient characteristics
| Number (%) or median (range) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68 (54-90) | |
| T Stage | ||
| T1 | 1 (5 %) | |
| T2 | 4 (21 %) | |
| T3 | 12 (63 %) | |
| T4 | 2 (11 %) | |
| N Stage | ||
| Nx | 6 (32 %) | |
| N0 | 1 (5 %) | |
| N1 | 12 (63 %) | |
| Metastasis Location* | *patients may have more than one location | |
| Lymph node | 12 (63 %) | |
| Bone | 17 (90 %) | |
| Lung | 1 (5 %) | |
| Liver | 1 (5 %) | |
| Biopsy Gleason Sum | ||
| 7 | 5 (26 %) | |
| 8 to 10 | 14 (74 %) | |
| Years since diagnosis (years) | ||
| Mean | 6 (0 - 12) | |
| Prior (initial) therapy | ||
| only radical prostatectomy | 5 (26 %) | |
| other therapies | 14 (74 %) | |
| Actual therapy* | *patients may have combination of therapies | |
| LHRH agonist/antagonist | 10 (53 %) | |
| Antiandrogen | 12 (63 %) | |
| Chemotherapy | 4 (21 %) | |
| Radium-223 | 1 (5 %) | |
| Laboratory data | ||
| PSA (ng / mL) | 31.13 (0.15 - 854.46) | |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U / L) | 105.5 (37 - 1460) | |
| LDH (U / L) | 203.5 (103 - 618) | |
| Haemoglobin (g / dL) | 12.4 (9.1 - 15) | |
| CTC count | ||
| unfavorable | 10 (53 %) | |
| favorable | 9 (47 %) |
Detailed patient characteristics and CTC / PSMA results
| Circulating tumor cells | Primary tumor | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intensity of PSMA immunostaining | PSMA positive CTCs | PSMA Mean | ||||||||||||||||
| ID | Age | T | N | M | Initial Gleason | Initial PSA ng/ml | tPSA | AP | LDH | HB | Actual therapy | Total No. | neg. | weak | moderate | strong | ||
| 1 | 66 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5+4 | 99 | 79.88 | 72 | 198 | 10.8 | DXI, nsAA | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 65 % |
| 2 | 68 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3+5 | - | 1.79 | 62 | 209 | 11.8 | DXI | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 70 % |
| 3 | 54 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3+4 | 85 | 16.97 | 93 | 193 | 13.3 | CC, nsAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 4 | 74 | 3 | - | 1 | 5+5 | 389.9 | 0.05 | 37 | 170 | 12 | other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 80 % |
| 5 | 61 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | >5000 | 0.29 | 88 | - | 13.2 | Abirateron, CC | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 80 % |
| 6 | 83 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4+3 | 7.94 | 6.12 | 114 | 238 | 12.9 | CC | 105 | 0 | 45 | 20 | 40 | 100 % | 30 % |
| 7 | 72 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4+4 | 150 | 77.83 | 106 | 223 | 12.8 | nsAA, CC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 8 | 66 | 2 | x | 1 | 3+4 | 7.8 | 7.34 | - | - | - | Abirateron | 24 | 0 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 100 % | 30 % |
| 9 | 66 | 3 | x | 1 | 5+4 | 167 | 31.96 | - | - | - | CC | 46 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15 % | - |
| 10 | 72 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | 58 | 600.99 | 199 | 170 | 14.1 | nsAA, CC | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 44 % | 65 % |
| 11 | 60 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | 372 | 243.22 | 124 | 103 | 14.2 | Abirateron, CC | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 20 % |
| 12 | 62 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4+3 | 43 | 52.46 | - | - | - | nsAA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 25 % |
| 13 | 76 | 3 | - | 1 | 4+5 | 9.5 | 31.13 | 82 | 179 | 15 | CC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 55 % |
| 14 | 65 | 2 | - | 1 | 3+4 | 63 | - | 118 | 225 | 9.1 | Abirateron | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 15 | 76 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5+5 | 8.21 | 854.46 | 1460 | 618 | 11 | DXI | 426 | 400 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 4.50 % | 50 % |
| 16 | 49 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | 31 | 18.92 | 540 | 157 | 13.9 | DXI, CC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 17 | 77 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | 3.1 | 15.56 | 402 | - | 11.1 | Abirateron, CC | 24 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12.50 % | 7.50 % |
| 18 | 90 | 3 | - | 1 | 4+5 | 433 | 117.59 | 105 | 219 | 10.1 | Abirateron | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | 90 % |
| 19 | 72 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | 13 | 0.15 | 68 | 220 | 10.6 | Abirateron | 158 | 112 | 23 | 3 | 20 | 29 % | - |
| 20 | 58 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3+4 | - | 1043 | 370 | 293 | - | - | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 62.50 % | - |
| 21 | 59 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3+4 | - | 98.89 | 230 | 300 | 11 | CC | 150 | 0 | 85 | 0 | 65 | 100 % | - |
| 22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 23 | 68 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | 7009 | 427.3 | 1033 | 332 | 9 | DXI, CC | 1000 | 0 | 940 | 30 | 30 | 100 % | - |
| 24 | 76 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | 25 | 12.27 | - | - | - | CC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 25 | 74 | 3 | x | 1 | 4+5 | 3 | 0 | 121 | 149 | 12 | CC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 26 | 58 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | 70 | 31.24 | 99 | 283 | 15.1 | CC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 27 | 66 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5+4 | 99 | 86.13 | 81 | 268 | 9 | Other (Xofigo) | 89 | 81 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 9 % | - |
| 28 | 71 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | >100 | 50.83 | 68 | 165 | 14.1 | DXI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 % | - |
| 29 | 65 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4+5 | - | 10 | 424 | 216 | 14.4 | CC, nsAA | 14 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 57 % | - |
DXI = Docetaxel, nsAA = non-steroidal anti-androgene, CC = chemical castration, - = no data)