Literature DB >> 28649735

Diagnostic sensitivity of Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT in prostate carcinoma: A comparative analysis with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.

Ismaheel O Lawal1, Alfred O Ankrah1,2, Neo P Mokgoro1, Mariza Vorster1, Alex Maes1,3, Mike M Sathekge1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emerging data from published studies are demonstrating the superiority of Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer. However, the low yield of the Ge-68/Ga-68 from which Gallium-68 is obtained and fewer installed PET/CT systems compared to the SPECT imaging systems may limit its availability. We, therefore, evaluated in a head-to-head comparison, the diagnostic sensitivity of Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and Tc-99m PSMA SPECT/CT in patients with prostate cancer.
METHODS: A total of 14 patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer were prospectively recruited to undergo Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT. The mean age of patients was 67.21 ± 8.15 years and the median PSA level was 45.18 ng/mL (range = 1.51-687 ng/mL). SUVmax of all lesions and the size of lymph nodes with PSMA avidity on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT were determined. Proportions of these lesions detected on Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT read independent of PET/CT findings were determined.
RESULTS: A total of 46 lesions were seen on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT localized to the prostate (n = 10), lymph nodes (n = 24), and bones (n = 12). Of these, Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT detected 36 lesions: Prostate = 10/10 (100%), lymph nodes = 15/24 (62.5%), and bones = 11/12 (91.7%) with an overall sensitivity of 78.3%. Lesions detected on Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT were bigger in size (P < 0.001) and had higher SUVmax (P < 0.001) as measured on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT compared to those lesions that were not detected. All lymph nodes greater than 10 mm in size were detected while only 28% of nodes less than 10 mm were detected by Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT. In a univariate analysis, Lymph node size (P = 0.033) and the SUVmax of all lesions (P = 0.007) were significant predictors of lesion detection on Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT.
CONCLUSION: Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA may be a useful in imaging of prostate cancer although with a lower sensitivity for lesion detection compared to Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT. Its use is recommended when Ga-68 PSMA is not readily available, in planning radio-guided surgery or the patient is being considered for radio-ligand therapy with Lu-177 PSMA. It performs poorly in detecting small-sized lesions hence its use is not recommended in patients with small volume disease.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/CT; PSMA; SPECT/CT; Tc-99m; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28649735     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  11 in total

1.  99mTc-PSMA targeted robot-assisted radioguided surgery during radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Burçak Yılmaz; Selçuk Şahin; Nurhan Ergül; Yunus Çolakoğlu; Halil Fırat Baytekin; Doğukan Sökmen; Volkan Tuğcu; Ali İhsan Taşçı; Tevfik Fikret Çermik
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 2.  A Review on the Current State and Future Perspectives of [99mTc]Tc-Housed PSMA-i in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sara Brunello; Nicola Salvarese; Debora Carpanese; Carolina Gobbi; Laura Melendez-Alafort; Cristina Bolzati
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 3.  Radiopharmaceuticals for PET and SPECT Imaging: A Literature Review over the Last Decade.

Authors:  George Crișan; Nastasia Sanda Moldovean-Cioroianu; Diana-Gabriela Timaru; Gabriel Andrieș; Călin Căinap; Vasile Chiș
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Preparation and clinical translation of 99mTc-PSMA-11 for SPECT imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kusum Vats; Kanhaiyalal Agrawal; Rohit Sharma; Haladhar Dev Sarma; Drishty Satpati; Ashutosh Dash
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 5.  What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Luc Bidaut; John Dickson; Marc Kachelriess; Fabian Kiessling; Rainer Leitgeb; Jingfei Ma; Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar; Benjamin Theek; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  177Lu-DOTA-HYNIC-Lys(Nal)-Urea-Glu: Biokinetics, Dosimetry, and Evaluation in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Clara Santos-Cuevas; Guillermina Ferro-Flores; Francisco O García-Pérez; Nallely Jiménez-Mancilla; Gerardo Ramírez-Nava; Blanca Ocampo-García; Myrna Luna-Gutiérrez; Erika Azorín-Vega; Jenny Davanzo; Irma Soldevilla-Gallardo
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  225Ac-PSMA-617 in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mike Sathekge; Frank Bruchertseifer; Otto Knoesen; Florette Reyneke; Ismaheel Lawal; Thabo Lengana; Cindy Davis; Johncy Mahapane; Ceceila Corbett; Mariza Vorster; Alfred Morgenstern
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Two decades of SPECT/CT - the coming of age of a technology: An updated review of literature evidence.

Authors:  Ora Israel; O Pellet; L Biassoni; D De Palma; E Estrada-Lobato; G Gnanasegaran; T Kuwert; C la Fougère; G Mariani; S Massalha; D Paez; F Giammarile
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Direct comparison of 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Batool Albalooshi; Mouza Al Sharhan; Fariborz Bagheri; Shabna Miyanath; Bhavna Ray; Muhammed Muhasin; Seyed Rasoul Zakavi
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020

Review 10.  Global experience with PSMA-based alpha therapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mike M Sathekge; Frank Bruchertseifer; Mariza Vorster; Alfred Morgenstern; Ismaheel O Lawal
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.