Literature DB >> 29077706

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in non-small cell lung cancer.

Lars Henning Schmidt1, Birthe Heitkötter2, Arik B Schulze1, Christoph Schliemann1, Konrad Steinestel2,3, Marcel Trautmann2, Alessandro Marra4, Ludger Hillejan5, Michael Mohr1, Georg Evers1, Eva Wardelmann2, Kambiz Rahbar6, Dennis Görlich7, Georg Lenz1,8,9, Wolfgang E Berdel1, Wolfgang Hartmann2, Rainer Wiewrodt1, Sebastian Huss2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) is overexpressed in prostate cancer cells and is reported to be a promising target for antibody-based radioligand therapy in patients with metastasized prostate cancer. Since PSMA expression is not restricted to prostate cancer, the underlying study investigates PSMA expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was used to identify PSMA expression in n = 275 samples of NSCLC tissue specimens. By means of CD34 co-expression, the level of PSMA expression in tumor associated neovasculature was investigated. The impact of PSMA expression on clinicopathologic parameters and prognosis was evaluated.
RESULTS: PSMA tumor cell expression in NSCLC is as low as 6% and was predominantly found in squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.002). Neovascular PSMA expression was found in 49% of NSCLC. High neovascular PSMA expression was associated with higher tumor grading (G3/G4) (p < 0.001). Neither for PSMA tumor cell expression, nor for PSMA neovascular cell expression prognostic effects were found for the investigated NSCLC cases.
CONCLUSION: Here, we report on the expression of PSMA in NSCLC tissue samples. Against the background of a potential treatment with radiolabeled PSMA ligands, our data might serve for the future identification of patients who could benefit from this therapeutic option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29077706      PMCID: PMC5659610          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The fact that patients are often diagnosed with late-stage and/or metastatic disease contributes to the high mortality of lung cancer patients. Since lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-related death, it is necessary to improve both our diagnostic and our therapeutic armamentarium to overcome its high lethality and its poor prognosis[1]. PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein with influence on the activity of folate hydrolase and neurocarboxypeptidase[2, 3]. Initially, upregulation of PSMA was found in prostate cancer cells. Consequently, PSMA-based imaging technologies for the detection of metastatic disease in advanced-stage prostate cancer patients were developed and PSMA-based radioligand therapy was introduced as a therapeutic regimen in metastasized prostate cancer[3-10]. In addition, PSMA is expressed in the endothelium of tumor-associated neovasculature of various solid malignancies (i.e. breast, lung and urothelial cancer), possibly due to tumor-associated angiogenic factors[11-15]. Functionally, PSMA might facilitate endothelial cell sprouting and invasion through its regulation of lytic proteases that have the ability to cleave the extracellular matrix[6, 16]. Moreover, the expression of PSMA in malignancy-associated neovasculature bears the possibility of specific antibody-based therapies. The current study has its focus on the expression of PSMA in a comprehensive lung cancer study cohort of n = 275 patients. In the context of PSMA-targeted anti-tumor therapies, both neovascular and tumor cell PSMA expression were evaluated.

Methods

Study population

Lung cancer tissue samples and the corresponding clinical follow-up data of n = 275 curatively resected NSCLC patients (217 NSCLC patients from the Thoracic Departments in Ostercappeln, Germany; 58 NSCLC patients from the University Hospital Mainz) were collected and examined. Patients with stage IV, neoadjuvant treatment, R1 or R2 resection status, or with non-specified tumor histology (e.g. NSCLC not otherwise specified) were excluded from our analysis. All tissue samples are embedded in tissue microarrays. The original patient data set contains 304 patient samples. Due to loss of tissue sections from the arrays, immunohistochemical evaluation was not possible in 29 cases. Hence, 275 NSCLC patients were included for further evaluation. Approval of the study by the Ethical Committees in Mainz [837.188.99 (2133)] and Münster [Az 2016-445-f-S and Reg.Nr.:4XMüller1] were obtained. All data were fully anonymized before they were accessed and the local ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. Clinical TNM staging (including clinical examination, CT scans, sonography, endoscopy, MRI, bone scan) was based on IUCC/AJCC recommendations. In terms of definite tumor staging, pathological exploration was carried out post-surgically. Primary pulmonary lesions were pathologically classified based on the WHO 2004 guidelines; 121 specimens were classified as squamous cell carcinoma, 112 as adenocarcinoma and 42 as large cell carcinoma. Survival time was either computed from the date of histological diagnosis to death or censored at the date of last contact. Baseline information of the NSCLC population is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the NSCLC study population.

Parametern% of non-missing values
Age (mean)66.1 years
Sex
Female6624
Male20976
Tumor cell PSMA expression
SI 025894
SI 1114
SI 252
SI 311
Neovascular PSMA expression
SI 014051
SI 19234
SI 23914
SI 342
Performance status (WHO ECOG
ECOG 04718
ECOG 120277
ECOG 2145
Tumor Histology
Adenocarcinoma11241
Large cell carcinoma4215
Squamous cell carcinoma12144
Tumor stage
UICC Tumor stage I18868
UICC Tumor stage II6022
UICC Tumor stage III2710
Grading
G162
G29435
G313851
G43112

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on 4-μm-thick paraffin sections using the peroxidase-conjugated avidin-biotin method. Primary antibodies included a monoclonal mouse anti-PSMA antibody (clone 3E6, Ventana, Germany, 1:50 dilution), monoclonal anti-CD34 antibody (clone QBEnd10, Ventana, Germany, ready to use concentration of 0.8μg/ml) and anti-CD31 antibody (clone JC70, Cell Marque, United States, concentration of 0.61μg/ml). In brief, sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through graded ethanol at room temperature. Incubation with the primary antibodies was performed for 30 minutes at room temperature. After washing, the paraffin sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibodies. Immunoreactions were visualized using a 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole as a substrate (Ventana Optiview DAB IHC detection KIT, Germany). Prostate carcinoma tissue sections served as a positive control. Several anti-PSMA antibodies are currently available and the most commonly used subclones include 7E11 and 3E6. We decided to use clone 3E6 as it targets an extracellular epitope of PSMA. For imaging or therapeutic purposes only antibodies targeting extracellular domains can be potentially used as they have to be internalized by living cells.

Assessment of PSMA expression

PSMA expression was evaluated by two pathologists (BH and KS). In lung cancer, tumor cells and associated neovascular endothelium were analyzed separately, and the identity of vascular structures was confirmed by CD34 coexpression, a marker for endothelial cells among others[17-19]. Any reactivity in either tumor cells or neoplastic vessels was considered positive. Staining intensity was scored semiquantitatively as negative (0), weak (1 = barely perceptible staining at high power (400x) magnification), moderate (2 = readily apparent at low power (40x) magnification) or strong (3). The fraction of PSMA positive cells was assessed as < 5% or ≥ 5%. In the case of heterogeneous staining, the predominant pattern was recorded. For further analysis, labeling indices were defined. A weak (1) or moderate (2) staining intensity in ≤ 5% of the neovasculature and a weak (1) staining intensity in > 5% of the neovasculature was allocated to the “low expression” group (PSMA labelling index = 1), whereas a moderate (2) staining intensity in > 5% of the neovasculature and a strong (3) staining intensity in ≤ or > 5% of the neovasculature were assigned to the “strong expression” group (PSMA labelling index = 2). This scoring system has been previously established in soft tissue tumors[20, 21].

Statistics

SPSS (SPSS Statistics, Version 24.0 released 2016, IBM Corp., Armonk, United States) was used for all statistical analyses. The study population was described by standard descriptive statistical measures. For categorical variables, absolute and relative frequencies are reported. Continuous variables are described by mean, standard deviation, median and inter-quartile range (IQR). Survival time is defined from first diagnosis until death. Univariate overall survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank tests. We considered potential prognostic factors that are tolerably complete (less than ten missing values, and with at least ten cases) to prevent statistical problems emerging from low sample size and extreme values. Patients with missing values in the cofactors were excluded from the analysis. All statistical tests were performed as exploratory analyses on a local significance level of 0.05. Since multiplicity adjustment was not carried out, no distinct overall significance level was ascertained. Hence, our findings may be used to set up new hypotheses.

Results

PSMA expression in NSCLC tissues

Baseline characteristics of n = 275 NSCLC patients with available immunohistochemical staining results are summarized in Table 1. A positive immunostaining (i.e. 2+/3+, according to the scoring system as described above) of tumor tissues with the monoclonal PSMA antibody was found in n = 17 cases (6%). Likewise, a positive immunostaining (i.e. 1+/2+/3+, according to the scoring system as described above) of neovascular PSMA expression was found in n = 135 cases (49%). In the 14 cases with PSMA-positive squamous lung cancer cells the tumor associated neovasculature was expressing PSMA in 8 cases. A representative example for PSMA expression is demonstrated in Fig 1.
Fig 1

PSMA expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

A (100x, anti-PSMA) displays strong PSMA expression in tumor cells. In B (100x, anti-PSMA), neovascular PSMA expression is shown. Neovasculature was identified by CD34 coexpression (insert, anti-CD34).

PSMA expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

A (100x, anti-PSMA) displays strong PSMA expression in tumor cells. In B (100x, anti-PSMA), neovascular PSMA expression is shown. Neovasculature was identified by CD34 coexpression (insert, anti-CD34).

Clinicopathological correlations

With regard to clinicopathological parameters, positive correlations for tumor cell PSMA expression (i.e. 2+/3+) were found for tumor histology. In total n = 17 patients displayed tumor cell PSMA expression. Among these patients, n = 14 patients suffered from squamous cell carcinoma (82%; p = 0.002, two-sided Fisher’s exact test). In contrast, tumor cell PSMA expression in adenocarcinoma and in large cell carcinoma was low (Table 2). With regard to tumor histology, neovascular PSMA expression also displayed a positive correlation. Here n = 69 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (51%) expressed PSMA in tumor-associated neovasculature, whereas n = 88 patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma (63%) were negative for neovascular PSMA expression (p = 0.021, two-sided Fisher’s exact test). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between high histological grade and PSMA expression, with PSMA-positive neovasculature found more frequently in high-grade or undifferentiated tumors. Of those, n = 99 tumor samples (75%) displayed positive neovascular PSMA expression (p < 0.001, two-sided Fisher’s exact test). The relationship of of neovascular PSMA staining and grading depending on the histological subtype is shown in supplementary S1 Table. Neither for tumor stage, nor for patient age relevant associations could be found (two-sided Fisher’s exact test for all: p > 0.05; Table 2). Of interest, of the n = 17 patients with positive tumor cell PSMA expression n = 13 patients were male (76%; p > 0.05, two-sided Fisher’s exact test) and n = 112 patients with positive neovascular PSMA expression (83%) were male (p = 0.011, two-sided Fisher’s exact test; Table 2).
Table 2

Correlations of clinicopathological variables with PSMA in NSCLC patients.

ParameterTumor cell PSMA expressionNeovascular PSMA expression
SI 0/1SI 2/3p-value*SI 0/1SI 2/3p-value*
Age0.7930.899
<70 years168109088
≥70 years8964946
Sex1.0000.011
Male1961397112
Female6244323
Performance status1.0000.108
ECOG 04522918
ECOG 1–320313104112
Tumor Histology0.0020.021
Non squamous cell carcinoma15138866
Squamous cell carcinoma107145269
0.0110.001
Non adenocarcinoma148156994
Adenocarcinoma11027141
0.4840.180
Non large cell carcinoma21716123110
Large cell carcinoma4111725
Tumor stage0.2840.605
UICC Tumor stage I174149890
UICC Tumor stage II-III8434245
Grading1.000<0.001
G1/G29466730
G3/G4159107099

*p-value according to two-sided Fisher’s exact test

*p-value according to two-sided Fisher’s exact test

Univariate prognostic effects

In the entire NSCLC study collective, neither tumor cell PSMA expression nor neovascular PSMA expression had a prognostic effect (both analyses p > 0.05; log rank test). Besides, no subgroup depending prognostic (i.e. tumor histology, grading and tumor stage) effects were found (p > 0.05; log rank test; Table 3). To visualize prognostic effects, Kaplan-Meier curves were generated (Fig 2A and 2B).
Table 3

Univariate log rank test results for the association of PSMA with overall survival for defined subgroups.

The investigated study collective consisted of n = 275 tissue microarray-embedded NSCLC specimens (immunohistochemical analysis).

ParameterTumor cell PSMA expressionNeovascular PSMA expression
SI 0/1 vs. SI 2/3SI 0/1 vs. SI 2/3
All investigated patients0.7290.663
Tumor Histology
Non squamous cell carcinoma0.1490.767
Squamous cell carcinoma0.9860.169
Tumor stage
UICC Tumor stage I0.7630.201
UICC Tumor stage II-III0.6070.341
Grading
G1/G20.2070.347
G3/G40.4270.065
Fig 2

Prognostic impact of PSMA expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Univariate prognostic models are shown for the immunohistochemical staining results (Fig 2A). Likewise prognostic models are given for neovascular PSMA expression of all patients as detected by immunohistochemistry (Fig 2B).

Prognostic impact of PSMA expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Univariate prognostic models are shown for the immunohistochemical staining results (Fig 2A). Likewise prognostic models are given for neovascular PSMA expression of all patients as detected by immunohistochemistry (Fig 2B).

Univariate log rank test results for the association of PSMA with overall survival for defined subgroups.

The investigated study collective consisted of n = 275 tissue microarray-embedded NSCLC specimens (immunohistochemical analysis).

Discussion

To overcome the poor prognosis of lung cancer patients, it is crucial to both improve the prognostic stratification of patients at the diagnostic level and to expand our therapeutic armamentarium. In this context, molecular targeted therapies on the basis of tumor-associated antigens are a promising approach. Among suitable candidates for targeted therapy concepts, the type II transmembrane protein PSMA might be a promising target antigen in lung cancer[22]. Two facts contribute to this strategy: (1) Upon ligand binding and subsequent endocytosis, PSMA is transported directly into the cells[23]. (2) Whereas strong PSMA expression is found in prostatic cancer cells (including advanced-stage prostate carcinomas)[24], normal tissue displays rather low expression levels[22]. With regard to these facts, enhanced uptake levels and retention in the tumor favor the local enrichment of antitumoral compounds. Hence, PSMA might serve as an ideal candidate for targeted radiopharmaceutical therapies[22]. Besides prostate carcinoma, PSMA expression has been detected in other malignancies[11-15]. Functionally, PSMA has been shown to be involved in angiogenesis and endothelial cell sprouting[6, 16], but its exact role in tumor-associated angiogenesis remain to be further clarified[25]. To identify the prognostic relevance of PSMA, we performed a systematic analysis of a comprehensive NSCLC study cohort (n = 275) with focus on the PSMA expression in both neovascular and tumor cells. In our study collective, PSMA tumor cell expression was found in n = 17 cases (6%). To our knowledge, there is only one additional study that reports on PSMA expression in lung cancer. Wang et al. describe high PSMA expression rates both for tumor neovasculature endothelial cells (85%) and for tumor cells (54%) in n = 150 NSCLC patients. Besides, PSMA-positive endothelial cells were found more often in early-stage NSCLC in contrast to advanced NSCLC tissues[12]. Similar to the published results, we detected strong neovascular PSMA expression levels in 49% of the investigated cases. However, the rate of NSCLCs with PSMA expression on tumor cells was much lower in our cohort (6%). The observed differences for PSMA expression on tumor cells might be due to a difference in the monoclonal antibodies that had been used in the different studies, heterogeneity of the investigated NSCLC study cohort and/ or differences in interpretation. In our study we used an anti-PSMA antibody (subclone 3E6) targeting the extracellular region of PSMA. In contrast to other subclones, it might be better used to predict the likely hood of success of PSMA imaging and therapy. With regard to PMSA expression, it is difficult not to misinterpret antibody reaction products in macrophages as positive tumor cells. Of interest, PSMA tumor cell expression was detected more often in squamous cell carcinomas than in non-squamous NSCLC samples. In our cohort, neovascular PSMA expression was detected in 49% of the investigated tumors. Overall, neovascular PSMA expression was found to be associated with higher histologic grade (p<0.001). Recently, we reported on PSMA expression patterns in soft tissue tumors[20]. In the latter study, higher histologic grade (e.g., poor tumor differentiation) had also been associated with higher neovascular PSMA expression. However, the biological relevance of this observation to be further clarified. According to one hypothesis, it might be due to intratumoral hypoxia as a result of rapid tumor growth. Since PSMA facilitates endothelial cell invasion during angiogenic sprouting, PSMA upregulation might enhance tumor vascularization in this setting[6, 16]. As a result, targeting PSMA-expressing neovessels might represent a promising therapeutic option in rapidly growing solid tumors. For patients with metastatic prostate cancer, the PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy has been shown to be a therapeutic and diagnostic option[4, 26, 27]. In the light of our findings, patients with PSMA expressing NSCLC tumors might benefit from PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapies. However, given the low frequency of PSMA expressing tumors (6% in our cohort, predominantly squamous cell carcinomas), prospective studies should focus on the immunohistochemical pre-evaluation in order to identify candidates with possible benefit from these targeted therapeutic approaches. Moreover, our findings of PSMA expression in tumor-associated neovasculature of 49% of the investigated cases might point towards a possible anti-angiogenic effects of PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy in these patients. In line with this theory, PSMA-targeted therapies in different non-prostate cancers have been recently published. Both, radionuclide based PSMA antibodies and PSMA-targeted docetaxel-containing nanoparticle were used and preliminary evaluated[28, 29]. In conclusion, our study reports the expression of PSMA in a subset of NSCLCs, especially in tumor-associated neovasculature. Expression does not seem to “drive” disease, but the presence of PSMA in these selected cases might represent a potential therapeutic target. With focus on the treatment with radiolabeled PSMA ligands, our data might serve for the identification of patients who might benefit from these novel and promising therapeutic approaches.

Correlation of clinicopathological variables with PSMA expression in NSCLC patients depending on tumor histology and grading.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Full data sample.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  28 in total

Review 1.  GCPII imaging and cancer.

Authors:  C A Foss; R C Mease; S Y Cho; H J Kim; M G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Expression of the CD34 gene in vascular endothelial cells.

Authors:  L Fina; H V Molgaard; D Robertson; N J Bradley; P Monaghan; D Delia; D R Sutherland; M A Baker; M F Greaves
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  The Global Burden of Cancer 2013.

Authors:  Christina Fitzmaurice; Daniel Dicker; Amanda Pain; Hannah Hamavid; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Michael F MacIntyre; Christine Allen; Gillian Hansen; Rachel Woodbrook; Charles Wolfe; Randah R Hamadeh; Ami Moore; Andrea Werdecker; Bradford D Gessner; Braden Te Ao; Brian McMahon; Chante Karimkhani; Chuanhua Yu; Graham S Cooke; David C Schwebel; David O Carpenter; David M Pereira; Denis Nash; Dhruv S Kazi; Diego De Leo; Dietrich Plass; Kingsley N Ukwaja; George D Thurston; Kim Yun Jin; Edgar P Simard; Edward Mills; Eun-Kee Park; Ferrán Catalá-López; Gabrielle deVeber; Carolyn Gotay; Gulfaraz Khan; H Dean Hosgood; Itamar S Santos; Janet L Leasher; Jasvinder Singh; James Leigh; Jost B Jonas; Jost Jonas; Juan Sanabria; Justin Beardsley; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Ken Takahashi; Richard C Franklin; Luca Ronfani; Marcella Montico; Luigi Naldi; Marcello Tonelli; Johanna Geleijnse; Max Petzold; Mark G Shrime; Mustafa Younis; Naohiro Yonemoto; Nicholas Breitborde; Paul Yip; Farshad Pourmalek; Paulo A Lotufo; Alireza Esteghamati; Graeme J Hankey; Raghib Ali; Raimundas Lunevicius; Reza Malekzadeh; Robert Dellavalle; Robert Weintraub; Robyn Lucas; Roderick Hay; David Rojas-Rueda; Ronny Westerman; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Sandra Nolte; Scott Patten; Scott Weichenthal; Semaw Ferede Abera; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Ivy Shiue; Tim Driscoll; Tommi Vasankari; Ubai Alsharif; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Vasiliy V Vlassov; W S Marcenes; Wubegzier Mekonnen; Yohannes Adama Melaku; Yuichiro Yano; Al Artaman; Ismael Campos; Jennifer MacLachlan; Ulrich Mueller; Daniel Kim; Matias Trillini; Babak Eshrati; Hywel C Williams; Kenji Shibuya; Rakhi Dandona; Kinnari Murthy; Benjamin Cowie; Azmeraw T Amare; Carl Abelardo Antonio; Carlos Castañeda-Orjuela; Coen H van Gool; Francesco Violante; In-Hwan Oh; Kedede Deribe; Kjetil Soreide; Luke Knibbs; Maia Kereselidze; Mark Green; Rosario Cardenas; Nobhojit Roy; Taavi Tillmann; Taavi Tillman; Yongmei Li; Hans Krueger; Lorenzo Monasta; Subhojit Dey; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; G Anil Kumar; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Lalit Dandona; Haidong Wang; Stein Emil Vollset; Ali Mokdad; Joshua A Salomon; Rafael Lozano; Theo Vos; Mohammad Forouzanfar; Alan Lopez; Christopher Murray; Mohsen Naghavi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen regulates angiogenesis by modulating integrin signal transduction.

Authors:  Rebecca E Conway; Nenad Petrovic; Zhong Li; Warren Heston; Dianqing Wu; Linda H Shapiro
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Five different anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) antibodies confirm PSMA expression in tumor-associated neovasculature.

Authors:  S S Chang; V E Reuter; W D Heston; N H Bander; L S Grauer; P B Gaudin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Targeting metastatic prostate cancer with radiolabeled monoclonal antibody J591 to the extracellular domain of prostate specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Neil H Bander; Edouard J Trabulsi; Lale Kostakoglu; Daniel Yao; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Peter Smith-Jones; Maureen A Joyce; Matthew Milowsky; David M Nanus; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen: a novel folate hydrolase in human prostatic carcinoma cells.

Authors:  J T Pinto; B P Suffoletto; T M Berzin; C H Qiao; S Lin; W P Tong; F May; B Mukherjee; W D Heston
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Phase I Study of PSMA-Targeted Docetaxel-Containing Nanoparticle BIND-014 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Monica M Mita; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Glen J Weiss; Alain C Mita; Patricia M LoRusso; Howard A Burris; Lowell L Hart; Susan C Low; Donald M Parsons; Stephen E Zale; Jason M Summa; Hagop Youssoufian; Jasgit C Sachdev
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  A novel cytoplasmic tail MXXXL motif mediates the internalization of prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Sigrid A Rajasekaran; Gopalakrishnapillai Anilkumar; Eri Oshima; James U Bowie; He Liu; Warren Heston; Neil H Bander; Ayyappan K Rajasekaran
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Early side effects and first results of radioligand therapy with (177)Lu-DKFZ-617 PSMA of castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer: a two-centre study.

Authors:  Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Kambiz Rahbar; Stefan Kürpig; Martin Bögemann; Michael Claesener; Elisabeth Eppard; Florian Gärtner; Sebastian Rogenhofer; Michael Schäfers; Markus Essler
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Looking for Drugs in All the Wrong Places: Use of GCPII Inhibitors Outside the Brain.

Authors:  James J Vornov; Diane Peters; Mike Nedelcovych; Kristen Hollinger; Rana Rais; Barbara S Slusher
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 2.  Tumor heterogeneity and nanoparticle-mediated tumor targeting: the importance of delivery system personalization.

Authors:  K Laxmi Swetha; Aniruddha Roy
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  PSMA-positive membranes secreted from prostate cancer cells have potency to transform vascular endothelial cells into an angiogenic state.

Authors:  Ryuta Watanabe; Masashi Maekawa; Takeshi Kiyoi; Mie Kurata; Noriyoshi Miura; Tadahiko Kikugawa; Shigeki Higashiyama; Takashi Saika
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.012

4.  A Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Near-Infrared Conjugate for Identifying Pulmonary Squamous Cell Carcinoma during Resection.

Authors:  Gregory T Kennedy; Feredun S Azari; Elizabeth Bernstein; Bilal Nadeem; Ashley E Chang; Alix Segil; Neil Sullivan; Isvita Marfatia; Azra Din; Charuhas Desphande; John C Kucharczuk; Philip S Low; Sunil Singhal
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.009

5.  Chimeric cytokine receptor enhancing PSMA-CAR-T cell-mediated prostate cancer regression.

Authors:  Shao Weimin; Asimujiang Abula; Ding Qianghong; Wang Wenguang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Spotlight on PSMA as a new theranostic biomarker for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maurizio Puccetti; Giovanni Paganelli; Sara Bravaccini; Maria Maddalena Tumedei; Sara Ravaioli; Federica Matteucci; Monica Celli; Ugo De Giorgi; Roberta Gunelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Non-prostate cancer tumours: incidence on 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT and uptake characteristics in 1445 patients.

Authors:  Elisa Perry; Arpit Talwar; Sanjana Sharma; Daisy O'Connor; Lih-Ming Wong; Kim Taubman; Tom R Sutherland
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  CAR-T Cells for the Treatment of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Luisa Chocarro; Hugo Arasanz; Leticia Fernández-Rubio; Ester Blanco; Miriam Echaide; Ana Bocanegra; Lucía Teijeira; Maider Garnica; Idoia Morilla; Maite Martínez-Aguillo; Sergio Piñeiro-Hermida; Pablo Ramos; Juan José Lasarte; Ruth Vera; Grazyna Kochan; David Escors
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08

9.  PSMA as a Theranostic Target in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Immunohistochemistry and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET Using Cyclotron-Produced 68 Ga.

Authors:  Scott M Thompson; Garima Suman; Michael S Torbenson; Zong-Ming E Chen; Danielle E Jondal; Anurima Patra; Eric C Ehman; James C Andrews; Chad J Fleming; Brian T Welch; Anil N Kurup; Lewis R Roberts; Kymberly D Watt; Mark J Truty; Sean P Cleary; Rory L Smoot; Julie K Heimbach; Nguyen H Tran; Amit Mahipal; Jun Yin; Tyler Zemla; Chen Wang; Zachary Fogarty; Mark Jacobson; Bradley J Kemp; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Geoffrey B Johnson; David A Woodrum; Ajit H Goenka
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2021-11-15

10.  Alternative and New Radiopharmaceutical Agents for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Silvi Telo; Letizia Calderoni; Sara Vichi; Federico Zagni; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Curr Radiopharm       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.