| Literature DB >> 35563938 |
Xiang Ren1, Yanjun Liu1, Chao Fan1, Hao Hong1, Wenzhong Wu1, Wei Zhang2, Yanwen Wang3.
Abstract
Microalgae have been increasingly considered as a sustainable "biofactory" with huge potentials to fill up the current and future shortages of food and nutrition. They have become an economically and technologically viable solution to produce a great diversity of high-value bioactive compounds, including n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The n-3 PUFA, especially eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), possess an array of biological activities and positively affect a number of diseases, including cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders. As such, the global market of n-3 PUFA has been increasing at a fast pace in the past two decades. Nowadays, the supply of n-3 PUFA is facing serious challenges as a result of global warming and maximal/over marine fisheries catches. Although increasing rapidly in recent years, aquaculture as an alternative source of n-3 PUFA appears insufficient to meet the fast increase in consumption and market demand. Therefore, the cultivation of microalgae stands out as a potential solution to meet the shortages of the n-3 PUFA market and provides unique fatty acids for the special groups of the population. This review focuses on the biosynthesis pathways and recombinant engineering approaches that can be used to enhance the production of n-3 PUFA, the impact of environmental conditions in heterotrophic cultivation on n-3 PUFA production, and the technologies that have been applied in the food industry to extract and purify oil in microalgae and protect n-3 PUFA from oxidation.Entities:
Keywords: EPA and DHA; biosynthesis pathways; heterotrophic cultivation; lipid purification; microalgae; microencapsulation; micronutrients; n-3 PUFA
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563938 PMCID: PMC9101592 DOI: 10.3390/foods11091215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Fatty acid composition (% of total fatty acids) of different microalgae species.
| Species | 14:0 | 16:0 | 16:1 | 18:0 | 18:1 | 18:2 | 18:3 | 20:5 EPA | 22:6 DHA | Total | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of Total Fatty Acids | |||||||||||
|
| 2.9 | 39.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 46.7 | 40–55 | [ | |
|
| 4–20 | 3.8 | 1–16 | 1–10 | 2–22 | 0–5.4 | 12–64 | [ | |||
|
| 18 | 12–45 | 3 | 8 | 13–55 | 25–63 | [ | ||||
| 10–28 | 12–16 | 8–11 | 5.9 | 12–36 | 14–21 | 12–46 | [ | ||||
|
| 18.9 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 19.8 | 9.2 | [ | |||||
|
| 0.9 | 11.3 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 19.3 | 9.0 | [ | |||
|
| 10.0 | 30.6 | 8.1 | 32.6 | [ | ||||||
|
| 4.2 | 14–24 | 24–30 | 3–5 | 2.9 | 0–9 | 27–49 | 22–37 | [ | ||
|
| 9.7 | 20.1 | 26.3 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 18.2 | 9.8 | 35 | [ | |
|
| 4.4 | 14–16 | 40–60 | 8.1 | 1.0 | 20–30 | 18.4 | 1.4 | 32 | [ | |
|
| 30.7 | 23.3 | 6–25 | 8–18 | 10–33 | 21–58 | [ | ||||
|
| 2–8 | 20–45 | 4.8 | 38.4 | 7.9 | 1.2 | 5–12 | 5–50 | 51–71 | [ | |
| 1.6 | 16.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 7.5 | 69 | 13 | [ | |||
|
| 4.1 | 13.3 | 34.4 | 10.5 | 17.4 | [ | |||||
| 25–30 | 10–12 | 5–15 | 15–30 | 20–52 | [ | ||||||
Figure 1A schematic illustration of the aerobic and anaerobic pathways assumed for microalgae. For the anaerobic pathway, enzymes involved are the 3-ketoacyl synthase (KS—red), 3-ketoacyl reductase (KR—orange), dehydrase/isomerases (DH—light blue), DH/2,2i = dehydrase 2-trans, 2-cis isomerase, DH/2,3i = dehydrase 2-trans, 3-cis isomerase, and enoyl reductase (βER—blue). (Modified from figures in [1,10,78].
Harvesting method of microalgae cells.
| Method | Description | Advantage | Disadvantage | Example | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sedimentation | Natural gravity sedimentation relies on the particle size of microalgae cells and the density difference of culture environment to harvest; suitable for large biomass and fast sedimentation rate. | Simple; | Affected by cell morphology, not applicable to small-diameter and low-density algae | The filamentous | [ |
| The diatom | [ | ||||
| [ | |||||
| Coagulation- | Coagulation and flocculation employ chemical (coagulant, zeta potential and pH) or physicochemical (e.g., hydrodynamics) principles to promote cell aggregation and form large particles for separation purposes | Efficient; | Possible | At high pH, Fe3+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ induced coagulation of | [ |
| Adjusted pH to 9.5 induced coagulation of | [ | ||||
| Centrifugation | Centrifugal method uses acceleration to harvest cells. Various types of centrifugal equipment can be used to harvest microalgae, such as spiral plate centrifuge, decanter centrifuge, disk stack centrifuge, and hydrocyclone. | Efficient; | High energy consumption; | A low biomass harvest efficiency of approx. 50% at 9000× | [ |
| A harvest efficiency of 99.3% achieved at 3000× | [ | ||||
| Flotation | Flotation is a method to transfer microalgae to the surface of culture medium by introducing bubbles (air or ozone), and then collect microalgae by skimming. | Efficient | High energy consumption | Using 3.8 L flotation cell and dissolved air flotation, the harvest efficiency reaches 91%. | [ |
| The heat-induced flotation of | [ | ||||
| Membrane filtration | Membrane filtration can be employed as dead-end or tangential flow filtration mode with membrane pore size varied from 0.1 μm to 10 μm for microfiltration and a few nanometers to 0.1 μm for ultrafiltration membrane respectively. | Pollution-free | Easy to be corroded by medium; | Driven by gravity, | [ |
| In the harvesting of | [ | ||||
| Drying | The water content of microalgae can be reduced to 10%. There are many drying methods, such as sun-drying, freeze-drying, oven-drying, spray drying, and drum drying. | Lower moisture content; | Long time; | Sun drying is done under sunlight, usually at 18–27 °C; the efficiency is 400–1200 mmol m−2 s−1; takes 2–3 days. | [ |
| Oven drying is done using hot air, usually at 60 °C, takes 12 h. | [ |
Overview of major microalgae cell disruption methods.
| Method | Description | Advantage | Disadvantage | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical Method | ||||
| Hydrothermal | Hydrothermal pretreatment is based on cell wall rupture due to internal pressure build-up from the heating, and hydrolysis of cell wall components by steam explosion, autoclave and water bath treatment. | Unrestricted moisture content; | High temperature may oxidize and degrade lipids and other bioactives; | [ |
| Acid/Alkaline treatment | Inorganic acid or alkaline solution is used to catalyze and promote hydrolysis processes as an improved version of hydrothermal pretreatment | Efficient; | Enhance the | [ |
| Oxidative pretreatment | Strong oxidant (such as ozone or hydrogen peroxide)is used togenerate hydroxyl radicals (OH-) that attack and disrupt the cell walls of microalgae. | Efficient; | Destroy highly oxidizable compounds | [ |
|
| ||||
| Pressing | A mechanical force is used to demolish the thick membrane of microalgae and release the oil content. Screw press, extruder, and biomass spraying are the main means of the mechanical pressing. | High purity of the target products; | Require highdryness of the biomass | [ |
| Bead beating | The membrane of microalgae is disrupted by the action of fast-moving spinning beads. | Simple equipment; | Need cooling equipment; | [ |
| High-pressure homogenization (HPH) | HPH is typically used for emulsification but is also suitable for a large-scale disruption of microalgae cells. | Efficient; | Product emulsification affects subsequent extraction | [ |
| Ultrasonication | Highpressure bubbles and their cavitation generate shock waves, producing high shear forces. | Simple; | Oxidation target product; | [ |
| Pulsed Electric Field | An intense electric field for very short durations (pulses)applied to microalgae cells to induces reversible or irreversible pores creation (electroporation) on the cell membranes to aid their disruption. | Suitable for freshwater microalgae; | Low efficiency; | [ |
|
| ||||
| Enzymatic methods | It is a specific pretreatment method, and requires high selectivity of suitable enzymeson the cell wall structure and composition of a special typeof algae. | High specificity; | High enzyme cost; | [ |
| CO2 explosion | It pressurizes CO2 inside the cell and increases intracellular gas concentration, leading to excessive expansion and cell rupture. Other non-reactive gasses such as N2 are also used. | Prevent degradation of target products; | High-cost | [ |
| Electricity-based methods | High voltage electric discharges (HVED) utilizes electrodes of needle-plate geometry to deliver high voltage pulses to microalgae suspensions. HVED additionally induces thermal and mechanical effects to the cells due to cavitation and shockwave formation. Non-thermal plasma is another electricity-based method where a needle-to-plate electrode geometry is placed in an argon filled reactor. | No chemical pollution; | Not suitable for extraction of unsaturated fatty acids | [ |
| Osmotic shock | A week-long pretreatment in which microalgae cells are broken up due to the density difference between cytoplasm and high salt solution. | Simple; | Time consuming | [ |
| Ionic liquids | Ionic liquids form a large number of hydrogen bonds that interact with polymers such as cellulose, and destroy the original hydrogen bonds in cellulose and break the cell wall. | High extraction rate; | Loss of ions over time; Potential ions pollution | [ |
| Viral cell lysis | Virus-assisted cell disruption is a novel method that appeals for low energy consumption. | No chemical pollution | Unknown control factors | [ |
Figure 2The process of spray drying.
Figure 3The process of complex coacervation.