| Literature DB >> 35542123 |
Khushman Taunk1, Ravindra Taware1, Tushar H More1, Priscilla Porto-Figueira2, Jorge A M Pereira2, Rajkishore Mohapatra3, Dharmesh Soneji4, José S Câmara2,5, H A Nagarajaram3,6, Srikanth Rapole1.
Abstract
Worldwide, breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) accounts for the majority of the reported cases of this form of cancer. IDC effective management, as for any form of cancer, would greatly benefit from early diagnosis. This, however, due to various socio-economic reasons, is very far for the reality in developing countries like India, where cancer diagnosis is often carried out at late stages when disease management is troublesome. With the present work, we aim to evaluate a simple analytical methodology to identify a set of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urine samples, as a biosignature for IDC. Using solid-phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, a panel of 14 urinary VOCs was found to discriminate IDC (n = 65) from a healthy control (HC) group (n = 70) through multivariate statistical treatments. Furthermore, metabolic pathway analysis revealed various dysregulated pathways involved in IDC patients hinting that their detailed investigations could lead to novel mechanistic insights into the disease pathophysiology. In addition, we validated the expression pattern of five of these VOCs namely 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, isolongifolenone, furan, dodecanoic acid, 2-methoxy-phenol in another external cohort of 59 urinary samples (IDC = 32 and HC = 27) and found their expression pattern to be consistent with the primary sample set. To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring breast IDC volatome alterations in Indian patients. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35542123 PMCID: PMC9082450 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra02083c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The representative full scan chromatograms of IDC and HC urine samples showing differential regulation of some of the statistically significant VOCs.
The panel of 14 statistically significant and differentially regulated VOCs identified through combination of univariate and multivariate statistical tests abiding the cut-off value criteria (FC ≥ 1.5/≤0.67; p-value ≤ 0.05 and VIP score ≥ 1.0) that discriminated IDC from HC group. Sorted according to the FC values in decreasing order. RT: retention time, KIexpt: experimental Kovat's index, KItheo: theoretical Kovat's index
| S. No. | Differentially expressed VOCs (common names) | Differentially expressed VOCs (NIST11 names) | VIP score | FC value | log2 FC value | Student's | Mann-Whitney | RT | KIexpt | KItheo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl- | 1.19 | 6.41 | 2.68 | 1.50 × 10−3 | 1.17 × 10−2 | 39.33 | 1423 | 1453 |
| 2 | Isolongifolenone | 2,4 | 1.75 | 2.41 | 1.27 | 2.76 × 10−3 | 4.56 × 10−3 | 75.125 | 2090 | — |
| 3 |
| Phenol, 3-methyl- | 1.11 | 1.89 | 0.92 | 9.27 × 10−3 | 3.86 × 10−3 | 72.497 | 2009 | 2060 |
| 4 | Acetic acid | Acetic acid | 1.30 | 1.86 | 0.90 | 2.08 × 10−3 | 3.58 × 10−5 | 37.672 | 1396 | 1400 |
| 5 | 2,2,7,7-Tetramethyltricyclo[6.2.1.0(1,6)]undec-4-en-3-one | 2,2,7,7-Tetramethyltricyclo[6.2.1.0(1,6)]undec-4-en-3-one | 1.49 | 1.86 | 0.90 | 2.12 × 10−2 | 9.50 × 10−3 | 73.229 | 2031 | — |
| 6 |
| Phenol, 4-methyl- | 1.02 | 1.79 | 0.84 | 1.17 × 10−2 | 3.80 × 10−3 | 72.314 | 2003 | 2031 |
| 7 | Phenol | Phenol | 1.12 | 1.79 | 0.83 | 1.63 × 10−3 | 2.83 × 10−3 | 70.382 | 1941 | 1946 |
| 8 | Guaiacol | Phenol, 2-methoxy- | 1.38 | 1.76 | 0.82 | 1.90 × 10−3 | 3.57 × 10−3 | 60.916 | 1785 | 1815 |
| 9 | Furan | Furan | 1.78 | 1.61 | 0.68 | 4.10 × 10−3 | 6.12 × 10−6 | 5.541 | 889 | 831 |
| 10 | Dimethyl trisulfide | Dimethyl trisulfide | 1.05 | 1.60 | 0.68 | 1.26 × 10−2 | 5.78 × 10−3 | 31.423 | 1301 | 1332 |
| 11 | Dodecanoic acid | Dodecanoic acid | 1.08 | 1.59 | 0.67 | 1.31 × 10−3 | 1.52 × 10−3 | 81.067 | 2263 | 2446 |
| 12 | Ylangene | Ylangene | 1.37 | 0.60 | −0.73 | 3.33 × 10−2 | 4.42 × 10−2 | 46.71 | 1543 | 1518 |
| 13 | 1,4-Dimethylpent-2-enylbenzene | 1,4-Dimethylpent-2-enylbenzene | 1.12 | 0.59 | −0.76 | 5.62 × 10−3 | 3.91 × 10−2 | 34.296 | 1347 | — |
| 14 | 1-4-Hydroxy-3,5-di- | 1-4-Hydroxy-3,5-di- | 1.61 | 0.47 | −1.08 | 1.02 × 10−2 | 2.57 × 10−2 | 78.998 | 2204 | — |
Fig. 2Multivariate statistical analysis for IDC and healthy controls VOC dataset through SIMCA. (A) PLS-DA score plot discriminating the IDC and healthy controls, (B) OPLS-DA score plot discriminating the IDC and healthy controls, (C) permutation test analysis of the OPLS-DA model depicting a valid model; Y-axis intercepts: R2 = 0.802, Q2 = 0.622, (D) hierarchical clustering analysis between the IDC and healthy controls separates the two groups.
Fig. 3The bar graph representing the expression profile of significantly altered VOCs as seen in the external cohort of subjects. (A) The five verified VOCs with SIM mode GC-MS analysis and (B) the semi-quantitative chromatographic areas graph for the nine VOCs. The bars are mean abundance values of the VOCs in samples acquired in duplicates with error bars as SEM. The star marks represents the p-value < 0.05. In panel B, the 3rd compound from left is 2,2,7,7-tetramethyltricyclo[6.2.1.0(1,6)]undec-4-en-3-one and the last compound is 1-4-hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl-2-methyl-3-morpholinopropan-1-one.
Fig. 4Metabolic pathway analysis performed by the MetPA tool in Metaboanalyst 3.0. Pathway topology analysis depicting dysregulated metabolic pathways in IDC patients.