| Literature DB >> 35645556 |
Michelle Leemans1, Pierre Bauër2, Vincent Cuzuel3, Etienne Audureau1,4, Isabelle Fromantin1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: An early diagnosis is crucial in reducing mortality among people who have breast cancer (BC). There is a shortfall of characteristic early clinical symptoms in BC patients, highlighting the importance of investigating new methods for its early detection. A promising novel approach is the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced and emitted through the metabolism of cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; E-nose; biomarker; breath; gas chromatography; in vitro study; mass spectrometry; urine; volatile organic compounds
Year: 2022 PMID: 35645556 PMCID: PMC9134002 DOI: 10.1177/11772719221100709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomark Insights ISSN: 1177-2719
Figure 1.PRISMA flowchart.
Studies on the analysis of patient-derived body fluids, animal-derived fluids, and BC cell lines.
| No. of study | Title | Author | Disease |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 1 | Early diagnosis of breast cancer from exhaled breath by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis: a prospective cohort study | Zhang et al
| Breast, gastric cancer |
| 2 | Differentiation between genetic mutations of breast cancer by breath volatolomics | Barash et al
| Breast cancer |
| 3 | Volatile organic metabolites identify patients with breast cancer, cyclomastopathy, and mammary gland fibroma | Wang et al
| Breast cancer |
| 4 | Investigation of potential breath biomarkers for the early diagnosis of breast cancer using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry | Li et al
| Breast cancer |
| 5 | Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath of patients with breast cancer in a clinical setting | Mangler et al
| Breast cancer |
| 6 | Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors | Peng et al
| Breast, lung, colorectal, prostate cancer |
| 7 | Volatile biomarkers in the breath of women with breast cancer | Phillips et al 57 | Breast cancer |
| 8 | Prediction of breast cancer using volatile biomarkers in the breath | Phillips et al 58 | Breast cancer |
| 9 | Volatile markers of breast cancer in the breath | Phillips et al
| Breast cancer |
| 10 | Quantitative analysis by gas chromatography of volatile carbonyl compounds in expired air from mice and human | Ebeler et al
| Breast cancer |
|
| |||
| 11 | Implementing a central composite design for the optimisation of solid phase microextraction to establish the urinary volatomic expression: a first approach for breast cancer | Silva et al
| Breast cancer |
| 12 | Exploring the potential of needle trap microextraction combined with chromatographic and statistical data to discriminate different types of cancer based on urinary volatomic biosignature | Porto-Figueira et al
| Breast, colon cancer |
| 13 | A non-invasive approach to explore the discriminatory potential of the urinary volatilome of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast | Taunk et al
| Breast cancer |
| 14 | Solid phase microextraction, mass spectrometry and metabolomic approaches for detection of potential urinary cancer biomarkers–a powerful strategy for breast cancer diagnosis | Silva et al
| Breast cancer |
|
| |||
| 15 | Volatomic pattern of breast cancer and cancer-free tissues as a powerful strategy to identify potential biomarkers | Silva et al
| Breast cancer |
| 16 | Screening of salivary volatiles for putative breast cancer discrimination: an exploratory study involving geographically distant populations | Cavaco et al
| Breast cancer |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 17 | Urinary volatile terpenes analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to monitor breast cancer treatment efficacy in mice | Woollam et al
| Breast cancer |
| 18 | Detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urine via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry QTOF to differentiate between localised and metastatic models of breast cancer | Woollam et al
| Breast cancer |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 19 | Identification of characteristic compounds of moderate volatility in breast cancer cell lines | Tanaka et al
| Breast cancer |
| 20 | Extracellular volatilomic alterations induced by hypoxia in breast cancer cells | Taware et al
| Breast cancer |
| 21 | Effect of H2O2 induced oxidative stress (OS) on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and intracellular metabolism in MCF-7 breast cancer cells | Liu et al
| Metabolism in MCF-7 cells |
| 22 | Volatile metabolomic signature of human breast cancer cell lines | Silva et al
| Breast cancer |
| 23 | Investigation of biomarkers for discriminating breast cancer cell lines from normal mammary cell lines based on VOCs analysis and metabolomics | Huang et al
| Breast cancer |
| 24 | Investigation of VOCs associated with different characteristics of breast cancer cells | Lavra et al
| Breast cancer |
|
| |||
| 25 | Breath mass ion biomarkers of breast cancer | Phillips et al
| Breast cancer |
| 26 | Secondary electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometry and a novel statistical bioinformatic approach identifies a cancer-related profile in exhaled breath of breast cancer patients: a pilot study | Martinez-Lozano Sinues et al
| Breast cancer |
| 27 | Fingerprinting breast cancer vs. normal mammary cells by mass spectrometric analysis of volatiles | He et al
| Breast cancer |
|
| |||
| 28 | Breath biopsy of breast cancer using sensor array signals and machine learning analysis | Yang et al
| Breast cancer |
| 29 | Identification of profiles of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath by means of an electronic nose as a proposal for a screening method for breast cancer: a case-control study | Díaz de León-Martínez et al
| Breast cancer |
| 30 | An in-vitro study for early detection and to distinguish breast and lung malignancies using the PCB technology based nanodosimeter | Venkatraman and Sureka
| Breast, Lung cancer |
| 31 | Effect of humidity on nanoparticle-based chemiresistors: a comparison between synthetic and real-world samples | Konvalina and Haick
| Breast cancer |
| 32 | Classification of breast cancer precursors through exhaled breath | Shuster et al
| Breast cancer |
|
| |||
| 2 | Differentiation between genetic mutations of breast cancer by breath volatolomics | Barash et al
| Breast cancer |
| 6 | Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors | Peng et al
| Breast, lung, colorectal, prostate cancer |
| 24 | Investigation of VOCs associated with different characteristics of breast cancer cells | Lavra et al
| Breast cancer |
| 30 | An in-vitro study for early detection and to distinguish breast and lung malignancies using the PCB technology based nanodosimeter | Venkatraman and Sureka
| Breast, Lung cancer |
| 31 | Effect of humidity on nanoparticle-based chemiresistors: a comparison between synthetic and real-world samples | Konvalina and Haick
| Breast cancer |
Figure 2.Summary of risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability for included studies: (A) risk of bias and (B) concerns regarding applicability.
Figure 3.Chemical classification of BC-related VOCs in different experimental settings.
Figure 4.Chemical classification of BC-related GC-MS identified VOCs in different experimental settings and different matrices: (A) in vitro, (B) in vivo, (C) case-control studies, (D) breath, (E) urine, and (F) other studies representing 1 study in saliva and 1 study in BC tissue.
Figure 6.Network analysis of BC studies distribution based on detected volatiles. The number in the circles represents the number of the study, allotted similarly in Table 1; grey squares represent the number of significant altered VOCs. Different colours represent different matrices; yellow: urine, orange: breath, red: tissue, green: cell media, and blue: saliva. Studies that had no VOC connection with any other study were left out of the network.
Figure 5.Venn diagram of the altered VOCs in the headspace of different matrices from BC subjects. The presented VOCs alter significantly in BC subjects compared to controls.
Figure 7.Workflow for volatomic analysis. First, measuring devices are needed (eg, GC-MC, GC-MS QTOF, SIFT-MS, E-nose) and the acquired data needs to be pre-processed (eg, normalisation, noise filtering, feature extraction). Next, data pre-processing enhances data quality by discarding variance and bias. Feature selection is employed to characterise the variables that have the predictive capacity for the condition of interest. Further, dimensionality reduction techniques mostly need to be utilised to avoid problems related to the curse of dimensionality. Various statistical techniques are employed to detect patterns in the large data sets with either regard to sample classification (supervised) or inconsiderate of the sample classification (unsupervised). After, a predictive model is built on a certain set of samples (training set) and evaluated on another set (validation set) of samples. Model selection is necessary to pick the optimum model with the best performance. Finally, the biological connotation of the obtained results can be given by the usage of metabolic databases such as KEGG database.