Literature DB >> 35495365

Measurements of Atmospheric Methane Emissions from Stray Gas Migration: A Case Study from the Marcellus Shale.

Lauren E Dennis1, Scott J Richardson1, Natasha Miles1, Josh Woda2, Susan L Brantley2,3, Kenneth J Davis1,3.   

Abstract

Understanding emissions of methane from legacy and ongoing shale gas development requires both regional studies that assess the frequency of emissions and case studies that assess causation. We present the first direct measurements of emissions in a case study of a putatively leaking gas well in the largest shale gas play in the United States. We quantify atmospheric methane emissions in farmland >2 km from the nearest shale gas well cited for casing and cementing issues. We find that emissions are highly heterogeneous as they travel long distances in the subsurface. Emissions were measured near observed patches of dead vegetation and methane bubbling from a stream. An eddy covariance flux tower, chamber flux measurements, and a survey of enhancements of the near-surface methane mole fraction were used to quantify emissions and evaluate the spatial and temporal variability. We combined eddy covariance measurements with the survey of the methane mole fraction to estimate total emissions over the study area (2,800 m2). Estimated at ∼6 kg CH4 day-1, emissions were spatially heterogeneous but showed no temporal trends over 6 months. The isotopic signature of the atmospheric CH4 source (δ13CH4) was equal to -29‰, consistent with methane of thermogenic origin and similar to the isotopic signature of the gas reported from the nearest shale gas well. While the magnitude of emissions from the potential leak is modest compared to large emitters identified among shale gas production sites, it is large compared to estimates of emissions from single abandoned wells. Since other areas of emissions have been identified close to this putatively leaking well, our estimate of emissions likely represents only a portion of total emissions from this event. More comprehensive quantification will require more extensive spatial and temporal sampling of the locations of gas migration to the surface as well as an investigation into the mechanisms of subsurface gas migration. This work highlights an example of atmospheric methane emissions from potential stray gas migration at a location far from a well pad, and further research should explore the frequency and mechanisms behind these types of events to inform careful and strategic natural gas development.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35495365      PMCID: PMC9037607          DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Earth Space Chem            Impact factor:   3.556


  17 in total

1.  Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers.

Authors:  Edward J Dlugokencky; Euan G Nisbet; Rebecca Fisher; David Lowry
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Direct measurements of methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mary Kang; Cynthia M Kanno; Matthew C Reid; Xin Zhang; Denise L Mauzerall; Michael A Celia; Yuheng Chen; Tullis C Onstott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Stream measurements locate thermogenic methane fluxes in groundwater discharge in an area of shale-gas development.

Authors:  Victor M Heilweil; Paul L Grieve; Scott A Hynek; Susan L Brantley; D Kip Solomon; Dennis W Risser
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Importance of Superemitter Natural Gas Well Pads in the Marcellus Shale.

Authors:  Dana R Caulton; Jessica M Lu; Haley M Lane; Bernhard Buchholz; Jeffrey P Fitts; Levi M Golston; Xuehui Guo; Qi Li; James McSpiritt; Da Pan; Lars Wendt; Elie Bou-Zeid; Mark A Zondlo
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Identification and characterization of high methane-emitting abandoned oil and gas wells.

Authors:  Mary Kang; Shanna Christian; Michael A Celia; Denise L Mauzerall; Markus Bill; Alana R Miller; Yuheng Chen; Mark E Conrad; Thomas H Darrah; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Exploring How to Use Groundwater Chemistry to Identify Migration of Methane near Shale Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin.

Authors:  Tao Wen; Josh Woda; Virginia Marcon; Xianzeng Niu; Zhenhui Li; Susan L Brantley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Evaluating a groundwater supply contamination incident attributed to Marcellus Shale gas development.

Authors:  Garth T Llewellyn; Frank Dorman; J L Westland; D Yoxtheimer; Paul Grieve; Todd Sowers; E Humston-Fulmer; Susan L Brantley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Stephen G Osborn; Avner Vengosh; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; David T Allen; Zachary R Barkley; Adam R Brandt; Kenneth J Davis; Scott C Herndon; Daniel J Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A Kort; Brian K Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D Maasakkers; Anthony J Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W Pacala; Jeff Peischl; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C Wofsy; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.