Literature DB >> 25786038

Stream measurements locate thermogenic methane fluxes in groundwater discharge in an area of shale-gas development.

Victor M Heilweil1, Paul L Grieve2, Scott A Hynek2, Susan L Brantley2, D Kip Solomon3, Dennis W Risser4.   

Abstract

The environmental impacts of shale-gas development on water resources, including methane migration to shallow groundwater, have been difficult to assess. Monitoring around gas wells is generally limited to domestic water-supply wells, which often are not situated along predominant groundwater flow paths. A new concept is tested here: combining stream hydrocarbon and noble-gas measurements with reach mass-balance modeling to estimate thermogenic methane concentrations and fluxes in groundwater discharging to streams and to constrain methane sources. In the Marcellus Formation shale-gas play of northern Pennsylvania (U.S.A.), we sampled methane in 15 streams as a reconnaissance tool to locate methane-laden groundwater discharge: concentrations up to 69 μg L(-1) were observed, with four streams ≥ 5 μg L(-1). Geochemical analyses of water from one stream with high methane (Sugar Run, Lycoming County) were consistent with Middle Devonian gases. After sampling was completed, we learned of a state regulator investigation of stray-gas migration from a nearby Marcellus Formation gas well. Modeling indicates a groundwater thermogenic methane flux of about 0.5 kg d(-1) discharging into Sugar Run, possibly from this fugitive gas source. Since flow paths often coalesce into gaining streams, stream methane monitoring provides the first watershed-scale method to assess groundwater contamination from shale-gas development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25786038     DOI: 10.1021/es503882b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

Review 1.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Measurements of Atmospheric Methane Emissions from Stray Gas Migration: A Case Study from the Marcellus Shale.

Authors:  Lauren E Dennis; Scott J Richardson; Natasha Miles; Josh Woda; Susan L Brantley; Kenneth J Davis
Journal:  ACS Earth Space Chem       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.556

4.  Detecting and explaining why aquifers occasionally become degraded near hydraulically fractured shale gas wells.

Authors:  Josh Woda; Tao Wen; David Oakley; David Yoxtheimer; Terry Engelder; M Clara Castro; Susan L Brantley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Methane in groundwater before, during, and after hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale.

Authors:  E Barth-Naftilan; J Sohng; J E Saiers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Assessing Connectivity Between an Overlying Aquifer and a Coal Seam Gas Resource Using Methane Isotopes, Dissolved Organic Carbon and Tritium.

Authors:  Charlotte P Iverach; Dioni I Cendón; Stuart I Hankin; David Lowry; Rebecca E Fisher; James L France; Euan G Nisbet; Andy Baker; Bryce F J Kelly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Assessing Residential Exposure Risk from Spills of Flowback Water from Marcellus Shale Hydraulic Fracturing Activity.

Authors:  Noura Abualfaraj; Patrick L Gurian; Mira S Olson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.