Literature DB >> 25941400

Evaluating a groundwater supply contamination incident attributed to Marcellus Shale gas development.

Garth T Llewellyn1, Frank Dorman2, J L Westland2, D Yoxtheimer3, Paul Grieve3, Todd Sowers3, E Humston-Fulmer4, Susan L Brantley5.   

Abstract

High-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) has revolutionized the oil and gas industry worldwide but has been accompanied by highly controversial incidents of reported water contamination. For example, groundwater contamination by stray natural gas and spillage of brine and other gas drilling-related fluids is known to occur. However, contamination of shallow potable aquifers by HVHF at depth has never been fully documented. We investigated a case where Marcellus Shale gas wells in Pennsylvania caused inundation of natural gas and foam in initially potable groundwater used by several households. With comprehensive 2D gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS), an unresolved complex mixture of organic compounds was identified in the aquifer. Similar signatures were also observed in flowback from Marcellus Shale gas wells. A compound identified in flowback, 2-n-Butoxyethanol, was also positively identified in one of the foaming drinking water wells at nanogram-per-liter concentrations. The most likely explanation of the incident is that stray natural gas and drilling or HF compounds were driven ∼ 1-3 km along shallow to intermediate depth fractures to the aquifer used as a potable water source. Part of the problem may have been wastewaters from a pit leak reported at the nearest gas well pad-the only nearby pad where wells were hydraulically fractured before the contamination incident. If samples of drilling, pit, and HVHF fluids had been available, GCxGC-TOFMS might have fingerprinted the contamination source. Such evaluations would contribute significantly to better management practices as the shale gas industry expands worldwide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Marcellus Shale; high-volume hydraulic fracturing; natural gas; shale gas; water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25941400      PMCID: PMC4443362          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1420279112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson; Thomas H Darrah; Stephen G Osborn; Adrian Down; Kaiguang Zhao; Alissa White; Avner Vengosh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Capillary tension and imbibition sequester frack fluid in Marcellus gas shale.

Authors:  Terry Engelder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Noble gases identify the mechanisms of fugitive gas contamination in drinking-water wells overlying the Marcellus and Barnett Shales.

Authors:  Thomas H Darrah; Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert J Poreda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Stephen G Osborn; Avner Vengosh; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evaluation of methane sources in groundwater in northeastern Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Lisa J Molofsky; John A Connor; Albert S Wylie; Tom Wagner; Shahla K Farhat
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.671

  6 in total
  24 in total

1.  Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in Pennsylvania, USA.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; David A Savitz; Sara G Rasmussen; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Jonathan Pollak; Dione G Mercer; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Elevated levels of diesel range organic compounds in groundwater near Marcellus gas operations are derived from surface activities.

Authors:  Brian D Drollette; Kathrin Hoelzer; Nathaniel R Warner; Thomas H Darrah; Osman Karatum; Megan P O'Connor; Robert K Nelson; Loretta A Fernandez; Christopher M Reddy; Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Martin Elsner; Desiree L Plata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hydraulic fracturing near domestic groundwater wells.

Authors:  Scott Jasechko; Debra Perrone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Groundwater methane in relation to oil and gas development and shallow coal seams in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of Colorado.

Authors:  Owen A Sherwood; Jessica D Rogers; Greg Lackey; Troy L Burke; Stephen G Osborn; Joseph N Ryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A decision analysis framework for estimating the potential hazards for drinking water resources of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids.

Authors:  Erin E Yost; John Stanek; Lyle D Burgoon
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.

Authors:  E Claire Botner; Amy Townsend-Small; David B Nash; Xiaomei Xu; Arndt Schimmelmann; Joshua H Miller
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Detecting and explaining why aquifers occasionally become degraded near hydraulically fractured shale gas wells.

Authors:  Josh Woda; Tao Wen; David Oakley; David Yoxtheimer; Terry Engelder; M Clara Castro; Susan L Brantley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Adverse Reproductive and Developmental Health Outcomes Following Prenatal Exposure to a Hydraulic Fracturing Chemical Mixture in Female C57Bl/6 Mice.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; John J Bromfield; Kara C Klemp; Chun-Xia Meng; Andrew Wolfe; R Thomas Zoeller; Victoria D Balise; Chiamaka J Isiguzo; Donald E Tillitt; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.736

10.  A systematic evaluation of chemicals in hydraulic-fracturing fluids and wastewater for reproductive and developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Adrienne S Ettinger; Brian P Leaderer; Michael B Bracken; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.