Literature DB >> 30855946

Importance of Superemitter Natural Gas Well Pads in the Marcellus Shale.

Dana R Caulton1, Jessica M Lu1, Haley M Lane1, Bernhard Buchholz2, Jeffrey P Fitts1, Levi M Golston1, Xuehui Guo1, Qi Li3, James McSpiritt1, Da Pan1, Lars Wendt4, Elie Bou-Zeid1, Mark A Zondlo1.   

Abstract

A large-scale study of methane emissions from well pads was conducted in the Marcellus shale (Pennsylvania), the largest producing natural gas shale play in the United States, to better identify the prevalence and characteristics of superemitters. Roughly 2100 measurements were taken from 673 unique unconventional well pads corresponding to ∼18% of the total population of active sites and ∼32% of the total statewide unconventional natural gas production. A log-normal distribution with a geometric mean of 2.0 kg h-1 and arithmetic mean of 5.5 kg h-1 was observed, which agrees with other independent observations in this region. The geometric standard deviation (4.4 kg h-1) compared well to other studies in the region, but the top 10% of emitters observed in this study contributed 77% of the total emissions, indicating an extremely skewed distribution. The integrated proportional loss of this representative sample was equal to 0.53% with a 95% confidence interval of 0.45-0.64% of the total production of the sites, which is greater than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency inventory estimate (0.29%), but in the lower range of other mobile observations (0.09-3.3%). These results emphasize the need for a sufficiently large sample size when characterizing emissions distributions that contain superemitters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30855946     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  A chemiresistive methane sensor.

Authors:  Máté J Bezdek; Shao-Xiong Lennon Luo; Kang Hee Ku; Timothy M Swager
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measurements of Atmospheric Methane Emissions from Stray Gas Migration: A Case Study from the Marcellus Shale.

Authors:  Lauren E Dennis; Scott J Richardson; Natasha Miles; Josh Woda; Susan L Brantley; Kenneth J Davis
Journal:  ACS Earth Space Chem       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.556

3.  Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites.

Authors:  Mark Omara; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Benjamin Hmiel; Katherine A Roberts; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Estimating Regional Methane Emission Factors from Energy and Agricultural Sector Sources Using a Portable Measurement System: Case Study of the Denver-Julesburg Basin.

Authors:  Stuart N Riddick; Fancy Cheptonui; Kexin Yuan; Mercy Mbua; Rachel Day; Timothy L Vaughn; Aidan Duggan; Kristine E Bennett; Daniel J Zimmerle
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.847

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.