Literature DB >> 21502176

Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers.

Edward J Dlugokencky1, Euan G Nisbet, Rebecca Fisher, David Lowry.   

Abstract

A factor of 2.5 increase in the global abundance of atmospheric methane (CH(4)) since 1750 contributes 0.5 Wm(-2) to total direct radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases (2.77 Wm(-2) in 2009), while its role in atmospheric chemistry adds another approximately 0.2 Wm(-2) of indirect forcing. Since CH(4) has a relatively short lifetime and it is very close to a steady state, reductions in its emissions would quickly benefit climate. Sensible emission mitigation strategies require quantitative understanding of CH(4)'s budget of emissions and sinks. Atmospheric observations of CH(4) abundance and its rate of increase, combined with an estimate of the CH(4) lifetime, constrain total global CH(4) emissions to between 500 and 600 Tg CH(4) yr(-1). While total global emissions are constrained reasonably well, estimates of emissions by source sector vary by up to a factor of 2. Current observation networks are suitable to constrain emissions at large scales (e.g. global) but not at the regional to national scales necessary to verify emission reductions under emissions trading schemes. Improved constraints on the global CH(4) budget and its break down of emissions by source sector and country will come from an enhanced observation network for CH(4) abundance and its isotopic composition (δ(13)C, δD(D=(2)H) and δ(14)C). Isotopic measurements are a valuable tool in distinguishing among various sources that contribute emissions to an air parcel, once fractionation by loss processes is accounted for. Isotopic measurements are especially useful at regional scales where signals are larger. Reducing emissions from many anthropogenic source sectors is cost-effective, but these gains may be cancelled, in part, by increasing emissions related to economic development in many parts of the world. An observation network that can quantitatively assess these changing emissions, both positive and negative, is required, especially in the context of emissions trading schemes.
© 2011 The Royal Society

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502176     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  40 in total

1.  An active atmospheric methane sink in high Arctic mineral cryosols.

Authors:  M C Y Lau; B T Stackhouse; A C Layton; A Chauhan; T A Vishnivetskaya; K Chourey; J Ronholm; N C S Mykytczuk; P C Bennett; G Lamarche-Gagnon; N Burton; W H Pollard; C R Omelon; D M Medvigy; R L Hettich; S M Pfiffner; L G Whyte; T C Onstott
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States.

Authors:  Scot M Miller; Steven C Wofsy; Anna M Michalak; Eric A Kort; Arlyn E Andrews; Sebastien C Biraud; Edward J Dlugokencky; Janusz Eluszkiewicz; Marc L Fischer; Greet Janssens-Maenhout; Ben R Miller; John B Miller; Stephen A Montzka; Thomas Nehrkorn; Colm Sweeney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs dominate cold methane seeps in floodplains of West Siberian rivers.

Authors:  Igor Y Oshkin; Carl-Eric Wegner; Claudia Lüke; Mikhail V Glagolev; Illiya V Filippov; Nikolay V Pimenov; Werner Liesack; Svetlana N Dedysh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Overexplaining or underexplaining methane's role in climate change.

Authors:  Michael J Prather; Christopher D Holmes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development.

Authors:  Dana R Caulton; Paul B Shepson; Renee L Santoro; Jed P Sparks; Robert W Howarth; Anthony R Ingraffea; Maria O L Cambaliza; Colm Sweeney; Anna Karion; Kenneth J Davis; Brian H Stirm; Stephen A Montzka; Ben R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airport-related contributions to ambient air pollution: A review.

Authors:  Mauro Masiol; Roy M Harrison
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Evidence for nitrite-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation as a previously overlooked microbial methane sink in wetlands.

Authors:  Bao-lan Hu; Li-dong Shen; Xu Lian; Qun Zhu; Shuai Liu; Qian Huang; Zhan-fei He; Sha Geng; Dong-qing Cheng; Li-ping Lou; Xiang-yang Xu; Ping Zheng; Yun-feng He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The terrestrial biosphere as a net source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.

Authors:  Hanqin Tian; Chaoqun Lu; Philippe Ciais; Anna M Michalak; Josep G Canadell; Eri Saikawa; Deborah N Huntzinger; Kevin R Gurney; Stephen Sitch; Bowen Zhang; Jia Yang; Philippe Bousquet; Lori Bruhwiler; Guangsheng Chen; Edward Dlugokencky; Pierre Friedlingstein; Jerry Melillo; Shufen Pan; Benjamin Poulter; Ronald Prinn; Marielle Saunois; Christopher R Schwalm; Steven C Wofsy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Atmospheric methane isotopic record favors fossil sources flat in 1980s and 1990s with recent increase.

Authors:  Andrew L Rice; Christopher L Butenhoff; Doaa G Teama; Florian H Röger; M Aslam K Khalil; Reinhold A Rasmussen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Methanobactin from Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b inhibits N2O reduction in denitrifiers.

Authors:  Jin Chang; Wenyu Gu; Doyoung Park; Jeremy D Semrau; Alan A DiSpirito; Sukhwan Yoon
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.