| Literature DB >> 35468844 |
Lei Guo1, Lian Gu1, Yihua Peng1, Yiming Gao1, Li Mei1, Qing Kang1, Chen Chen1, Yanran Hu1, Wenyan Xu2, Jue Chen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between online media exposure and disordered eating symptoms has been reported in western regions. Though the prevalence of eating disorders and access to the Internet increased substantially in recent years, relevant evidence is rare in mainland China. This study aims to evaluate the association between online media exposure or weight and fitness management app use and disordered eating symptoms in Chinese mainland young adults, and the mediation effect of disordered eating cognition.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese mainland; Disordered eating; Online media; Weight and fitness management app; Young adults
Year: 2022 PMID: 35468844 PMCID: PMC9036716 DOI: 10.1186/s40337-022-00577-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Eat Disord ISSN: 2050-2974
Fig. 1The proposed two moderated mediation models
The descriptive statistic and sex difference of demographic information, EDE-Q scores, and disordered eating behaviors
| Male ( | Female ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | [ | |||||
| Age | 19.0 | [19.0;20.0] | 19.0 | [19.0;20.0] | 3.155 | 0.002** |
| Education years | 13.0 | [12.0;13.0] | 13.0 | [12.0;13.0] | 0.551 | 0.582 |
| BMI | 21.7 | [19.5;24.6] | 20.2 | [18.7;21.9] | 5.280 | < 0.001*** |
| EDE-Q global | 0.69 | [0.22;1.88] | 1.22 | [0.62;2.13] | − 3.750 | < 0.001*** |
| EDE-Q dietary restraint | 0.60 | [0.00;1.75] | 0.60 | [0.20;1.40] | − 1.329 | 0.184 |
| EDE-Q eating concern | 0.20 | [0.00;0.60] | 0.40 | [0.20;1.00] | − 3.736 | < 0.001*** |
| EDE-Q weight concern | 1.00 | [0.00;2.40] | 1.80 | [0.80;3.00] | − 4.282 | < 0.001*** |
| EDE-Q shape concern | 1.06 | [0.38;2.62] | 1.88 | [0.88;3.25] | − 4.350 | < 0.001*** |
| Dietary restriction | 0.00 | [0.00;1.00] | 0.00 | [0.00;1.00] | − 0.477 | 0.633 |
| Objective binge | 0.00 | [0.00;0.00] | 0.00 | [0.00;2.00] | − 3.585 | < 0.001*** |
| Self-induced vomiting | 0.00 | [0.00;0.00] | 0.00 | [0.00;0.00] | − 0.631 | 0.528 |
| Laxative misuse | 0.00 | [0.00;0.00] | 0.00ara> | [0.00;0.00] | − 0.870 | 0.385 |
| Excessive exercise | 0.00 | [0.00;2.75] | 0.00 | [0.00;2.00] | − 0.257 | 0.797 |
**p < .01. ***p < .001
The descriptive statistic and sex difference of online media exposure and weight and fitness management app use
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 2 (1.4) | 12 (8.5) | 20 (14.1) | 28 (19.7) | 80 (56.3) | − 2.874 | 0.004** |
| Female | 1 (0.3) | 11 (3.1) | 35 (9.9) | 66 (18.7) | 240 (68) | ||
| Male | 23 (16.2) | 56 (39.4) | 38 (26.8) | 12 (8.5) | 13 (9.2) | − 3.484 | < 0.001*** |
| Female | 30 (8.5) | 99 (28) | 139 (39.4) | 53 (15.0) | 32 (9.1) | ||
| Male | 46 (32.4) | 37 (26.1) | 46 (32.4) | 7 (4.9) | 6 (4.2) | − 4.551 | < 0.001*** |
| Female | 43 (12.2) | 107 (30.3) | 137 (38.8) | 38 (10.8) | 28 (7.9) | ||
| Male | 102 (71.8) | 29 (20.4) | 0 (0) | 10 (7.0) | 1 (0.7) | − 3.814 | < 0.001*** |
| Female | 188 (53.3) | 114 (32.3) | 34 (9.6) | 11 (3.1) | 6 (1.7) | ||
| Male | 92 (64.8) | 32 (22.5) | 10 (7.0) | 3 (2.1) | 5 (3.5) | − 2.848 | 0.004** |
| Female | 184 (52.1) | 82 (23.2) | 63 (17.8) | 10 (2.8) | 14 (4.0) | ||
| Male | 88 (62.0) | 29 (20.4) | 17 (12.0) | 4 (2.8) | 4 (2.8) | − 1.723 | 0.085 |
| Female | 192 (54.4) | 74 (21.0) | 59 (16.7) | 17 (4.8) | 11 (3.1) | ||
| Male | 77 (54.2) | 25 (17.6) | 27 (19.0) | 6 (4.2) | 7 (4.9) | − 2.414 | 0.016* |
| Female | 151 (42.8) | 71 (20.1) | 77 (21.8) | 32 (9.1) | 22 (6.2) | ||
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001
The Spearman’s correlation coefficients between online media exposure, weight and fitness management app use, and disordered eating symptoms
| Daily internet use | Media info receive | Look for media info | Media info proportion | App use | Diet app recommend | Exercise app recommend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 0.14 | 0.29* | 0.29* | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.30* |
| Female | 0.07 | 0.41*** | 0.45*** | 0.42*** | 0.49*** | 0.47*** | 0.43*** |
| Male | 0.06 | 0.28* | 0.30* | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.30* |
| Female | − 0.01 | 0.38*** | 0.39*** | 0.43*** | 0.48*** | 0.45*** | 0.33*** |
| Male | 0.13 | 0.35** | 0.32** | 0.31* | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| Female | 0.05 | 0.34*** | 0.40*** | 0.35*** | 0.37*** | 0.35*** | 0.38*** |
| Male | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| Female | 0.08 | 0.38*** | 0.42*** | 0.39*** | 0.46*** | 0.45*** | 0.41*** |
| Male ara> | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.26 |
| Female | 0.11 | 0.37*** | 0.39*** | 0.35*** | 0.41*** | 0.41*** | 0.39*** |
| Male | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.30* | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.29* |
| Female | 0.03 | 0.21** | 0.26*** | 0.28*** | 0.30*** | 0.34*** | 0.24*** |
| Male | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.28* | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.2 |
| Female | 0.03 | 0.26*** | 0.24*** | 0.22** | 0.23*** | 0.25*** | 0.22** |
| Male | − 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
| Female | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| Male | − 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.09 |
| Female | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| Male | 0.07 | 0.33** | 0.25 | 0.29* | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Female | − 0.03 | 0.29*** | 0.28*** | 0.29*** | 0.35*** | 0.29*** | 0.35*** |
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001, Bonferroni corrected
Fig. 2The heat map of Spearman’s correlation between online media exposure, weight and fitness management app use, and disordered eating symptoms. Note: Asterisks denote significance after Bonferroni correction. Only significant coefficients are presented
The moderated mediation effect of disordered eating cognition on the relationship between online media exposure and disordered eating behaviors
| Predictors | (Regression 1) DE behaviors | (Regression 2) DE cognition | (Regression 3) DE behaviors |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 5.626*** | 1.258*** | 6.252*** |
| (0.427) | (0.046) | (0.417) | |
| Age | 0.438 | − 0.014 | 0.396 |
| (0.497) | (0.047) | (0.437) | |
| Education years | − 0.016 | 0.000 | − 0.012 |
| (0.188) | (0.017) | (0.164) | |
| BMI | 0.235* | 0.099*** | − 0.336** |
| (0.118) | (0.011) | (0.115) | |
| Online media exposure | 1.558*** | 0.172*** | 0.578** |
| (0.188) | (0.020) | (0.187) | |
| Sex | − 0.177*** | 1.467** | |
| (0.048) | (0.446) | ||
| Online media exposure × Sex | |||
| DE cognition | 5.334*** | ||
| (0.423) | |||
| 0.131 | 0.327 | 0.347 | |
| Adj. | 0.124 | 0.319 | 0.339 |
| Num. obs | 495 | 495 | 495 |
Unstandardized regression coefficients are displayed, with standard errors in parentheses
DE denotes disordered eating
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001
The moderated mediation effect of disordered eating cognition on the relationship between app use behaviors and disordered eating behaviors
| Predictors | (Regression 1) DE behaviors | (Regression 2) DE cognition | (Regression 3) DE behaviors |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 5.626*** | 1.249*** | 6.198*** |
| (0.432) | (0.045) | (0.419) | |
| Age | 0.331 | − 0.015 | 0.362 |
| (0.502) | (0.046) | (0.440) | |
| Education years | − 0.006 | 0.003 | − 0.002 |
| (0.191) | (0.017) | (0.165) | |
| BMI | 0.127 | 0.089*** | − 0.371** |
| (0.121) | (0.011) | (0.115) | |
| App use behaviors | 1.268*** | 0.139*** | 0.332* |
| (0.170) | (0.018) | (0.166) | |
| sex | − 0.209*** | 1.342** | |
| (0.047) | (0.446) | ||
| App use behaviors × sex | − | ||
| DE cognition | 5.532*** | ||
| (0.426) | |||
| 0.110 | 0.337 | 0.340 | |
| Adj. | 0.103 | 0.329 | 0.331 |
| Num. obs | 495 | 495 | 495 |
Unstandardized regression coefficients are displayed, with standard errors in parentheses
For short, weight and fitness management app use behaviors are described as app use behaviors, and DE denotes disordered eating
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001
Fig. 3The conditional effects of sex on the relationship between (A) online media exposure or (B) app use behaviors and disordered eating cognition. Note: SE standard error; CI confidence interval