Literature DB >> 3546397

Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

D Taylor-Robinson, B J Thomas, M F Osborn.   

Abstract

An enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis was evaluated on genital specimens from 96 men and 272 women attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases (STD clinic). Compared with a direct immunofluorescence test for chlamydial elementary bodies, the enzyme immunoassay had a sensitivity of 58% on specimens from men, a specificity of 90%, a positive predictive value of 93%, and a negative predictive value of 88%; the assay had a sensitivity of 67% on specimens from women, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 63% and a negative predictive value of 90%. Immunofluorescence provided the most stringent test for the performance of the enzyme immunoassay as values were improved a little when a cell culture procedure was used for comparison. Further evidence for the lack of sensitivity was the detection of elementary bodies, sometimes in large numbers, in the enzyme immunoassay buffer of 13 of 19 specimens that had given a negative enzyme immunoassay result and the finding in comparative titrations of four laboratory strains that the enzyme immunoassay was at least 100-fold less able to detect chlamydiae than either immunofluorescence or the cell culture procedure. Lack of specificity may be associated with the finding that the enzyme immunoassay antibody reacted with strains of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Escherichia coli, Gardnerella vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and group B streptococci. The enzyme immunoassay was not considered to be sufficiently sensitive, specific, or reproducible for routine use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3546397      PMCID: PMC1140867          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.40.2.194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  18 in total

1.  Preliminary evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M H Hambling; J B Kurtz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Monoclonal antibody based ELISA for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  E O Caul; I D Paul
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R T Evans; D A Hawkins; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from the cervix.

Authors:  A J Amortegui; M P Meyer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of chlamydial antigens from human specimens.

Authors:  G V Stokes; M W Khan
Journal:  Microbios       Date:  1984

6.  Relation between avidity and specificity of monoclonal anti-chlamydial antibodies in culture supernatants and ascitic fluids determined by enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  M T Matikainen; O P Lehtonen
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1984-09-04       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Chlamydiazyme test.

Authors:  M F Jones; T F Smith; A J Houglum; J E Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Early detection of chlamydial inclusions combining the use of cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells and immunofluorescence staining.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R T Evans; G R Hutchinson; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Salpingitis in mice induced by human strains of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M Tuffrey; P Falder; J Gale; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1986-08

10.  Immunoassay for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein.

Authors:  H D Caldwell; J Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  41 in total

1.  Value of confirmation of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay results in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  H Hallander; P Jonsson; B Gästrin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Accuracy of two enzyme immunoassays and cell culture in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in low and high risk populations in Senegal.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; N Samb; A D Sarr; L Van de Velden; J Moran; S Mboup; I Ndoye; J L Lamboray; A Meheus; P Piot
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Preliminary evaluation of "Clearview Chlamydia" for the rapid detection of chlamydial antigen in cervical secretions.

Authors:  H Young; A Moyes; H Lough; I W Smith; J G McKenna; C Thompson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

4.  The value of urine samples from men with non-gonococcal urethritis for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  P E Hay; B J Thomas; C Gilchrist; H M Palmer; C B Gilroy; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

Review 5.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

Review 6.  Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.

Authors:  Anthony W Solomon; Rosanna W Peeling; Allen Foster; David C W Mabey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Improved sensitivity of an enzyme immunoassay IDEIA for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  B J Thomas; M F Osborn; C Gilchrist; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Enzyme immunoassay compared with cell culture and immunofluorescence for detecting genital chlamydia.

Authors:  G Mumtaz; G L Ridgway; A Nayagam; J D Oriel
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Use of a Chlamydia trachomatis DNA probe for detection of ocular chlamydiae.

Authors:  D Dean; L Palmer; C R Pant; P Courtright; S Falkow; P O'Hanley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  C J Hall; C Nelder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.