Literature DB >> 3885103

Enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from the cervix.

A J Amortegui, M P Meyer.   

Abstract

An enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens was compared with isolation of the organism in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells using duplicate cervical swab specimens from 514 women. Chlamydia trachomatis was isolated after subculturing from 45 of 514 (8.8%) specimens, while the enzyme immunoassay, Chlamydiazyme detected chlamydial antigens in 37 of 45 (82.2%) of those women. Chlamydiazyme was as sensitive as primary isolation for detecting total infections. The specificity of Chlamydiazyme was 98.1%. The predictive values of a positive and negative Chlamydiazyme test compared with isolation after subculturing was 80.4 and 98.3%, respectively. Overall, 497 of 514 (96.7%) samples were identified correctly by Chlamydiazyme. Thus, Chlamydiazyme is a simple and rapid test that eliminates many of the problems encountered by isolation procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3885103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  M K Brokenshire; P J Say; A H van Vonno; C Wong
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

2.  Immunodiagnosis of ocular chlamydial infection.

Authors:  A Rahi; A Rashood; S Rahi; K F Tabbara; A al-Jama
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L V Howard; P F Coleman; B J England; J E Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Chlamydial infection among females attending an abortion clinic: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  P Levallois; J E Rioux; L Côté
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S S Hipp; Y Han; D Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of chlamydial inclusions in cell culture or biopsy tissue by alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase staining.

Authors:  J B Mahony; J Sellors; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of cell culture with two direct Chlamydia tests using immunofluorescence or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  P Pothier; A Kazmierczak
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas; M F Osborn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Evaluation of single whole inclusion serum test for IgG antibody to Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women.

Authors:  M P Meyer; A J Amortegui
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1987-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.