Literature DB >> 29620379

Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.

Rebecca R Goldstein1, Melissa R Beck1.   

Abstract

Attentional templates can be represented in visual working memory (VWM) when the target varies from trial-to-trial and can be represented in long-term memory (LTM) when the target is consistent during trial runs. Given that attentional templates can be represented in either VWM or LTM, are there any differences in how these representations impact visual search when targets are consistent compared with varying? The current study tested the consistent template hypothesis, which predicts faster performance with a consistent target compared with a varying target. Experiment 1 examined whether consistent targets could lead to consistent templates that would improve template establishment, guidance, and/or comparison of the template to search items. Search response time was faster for consistent targets, and consistent targets produced faster comparison processes, but not more efficient guidance. Experiment 2 examined the consistent template restoration hypothesis, which predicts faster template establishment and comparison processes for a previously encountered consistent target. Experiment 2 replicated the consistent template hypothesis and supported the consistent template restoration hypothesis. These studies demonstrate that although attentional guidance is similar with varying and consistent attentional templates, consistent templates improve search performance by speeding template establishment and comparison processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29620379     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Sharper attentional tuning with target templates in long-term compared to working memory.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; Yoonki Min; Koeun Jung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Target specificity improves search, but how universal is the benefit?

Authors:  Ashley M Ercolino; Pooja Patel; Corey Bohil; Mark B Neider; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Aniruddha Ramgir; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

4.  Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance.

Authors:  Ziyao Zhang; Renee Sahatdjian; Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 1.984

5.  Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived.

Authors:  Jonas Sin-Heng Lau; Hal Pashler; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Diminishing sensitivity and absolute difference in value-driven attention.

Authors:  Sunghyun Kim; Jason L Harman; Melissa R Beck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.