| Literature DB >> 35456858 |
Luciana Sampaio Lima1, Aldo Aparecido Proietti-Junior1, Yan Corrêa Rodrigues2, Marcelo Cleyton da Silva Vieira2, Luana Nepomuceno Gondim Costa Lima2, Cintya de Oliveira Souza2, Verônica Dias Gonçalves3, Marcelo de Oliveira Lima4, Dália Dos Prazeres Rodrigues3, Karla Valéria Batista Lima3.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli in distinct ecological niches, comprising water sources and food-producing animals, such as fish species, has been widely reported. In the present study, quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates from Arapirama gigas, a major fish species in the Brazilian Amazon rivers and fish farms, were characterized regarding their antimicrobial susceptibility, virulence, and genetic diversity. A total of forty (40) specimens of A. gigas, including 20 farmed and 20 wild fish, were included. Thirty-four quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates were phenotypically tested by broth microdilution, while resistance and virulence genes were detected by PCR. Molecular epidemiology and genetic relatedness were analyzed by MLST and PFGE typing. The majority of isolates were classified as MDR and detected harboring blaCTX-M, qnrA and qnrB genes. Enterotoxigenic E. coli pathotype (ETEC) isolates were presented in low prevalence among farmed animals. MLST and PFGE genotyping revealed a wide genetic background, including the detection of internationally spread clones. The obtained data point out A. gigas as a reservoir in Brazilian Amazon aquatic ecosystems and warns of the interference of AMR strains in wildlife and environmental matrices.Entities:
Keywords: Amazon region; ESBLs; PMQR; antimicrobial resistance; food-producing animals; genetic diversity; molecular epidemiology; pirarucu; quinolone-resistance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35456858 PMCID: PMC9030826 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Collection points of farmed and wild Arapaima gigas specimens, State of Macapá, Brazilian Amazon. W: wild, F: Fish farm.
Antimicrobial susceptibility characteristics of E. coli isolates from farmed and wild A. gigas in the Brazilian Amazon.
| Antimicrobial | Farmed ( | Wild * ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S (%) | NS (%) | S (%) | NS * (%) | |
| AMP | 4 (25) | 12 (75.0) | 3 (16.6) | 15 (83.4) |
| SAM | 5 (31.25) | 11 (68.75) | 7 (38.9) | 11 (61.1) |
| TZP | 14 (87.25) | 2 (12.75) | 18 (100) | 0 |
| CXM | 4 (25) | 12 (75.0) | 6 (33.3) | 12 (66.7) |
| FOX | 11 (68.75) | 5 (31.25) | 7 (38.9) | 11 (61.1) |
| CAZ | 13 (81.25) | 3 (18.75) | 8 (44.4) | 10 (55.6) |
| CRO | 12 (75) | 4 (25.0) | 6 (33.3) | 12 (66.7) |
| FEP | 15 (93.75) | 1 (6.25) | 7 (38.9) | 11 (61.1) |
| CIP | 0 | 16 (100.0) | 0 | 18 (100.0) |
S: susceptive; NS: non-susceptive (intermediate and resistant isolates). * Higher frequency of NS isolates (p = 0.005).
Phenotypical and molecular resistance features of E. coli strains isolated from Arapaima gigas in the Brazilian Amazon.
| Sample | Source | Resistance Profile | MDR | Molecular Profile | Virulence | ST | PFGE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | F1 | AMP, CIP | − | Commensal | 448 | D | |
| 02 | F1 | AMP, SAM, CRX, CFO, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 448 | A1 |
| 04 | F1 | AMP, CIP | − | Commensal | 448 | A1 | |
| 06 | F1 | AMP, CIP | − | Commensal | 448 | A1 | |
| 07 | F2 | AMP, SAM, CIP | + | Commensal | 1249 | A2 | |
| 08 | F2 | AMP, SAM, CIP | + | Commensal | 1249 | A2 | |
| 09 | F2 | AMP, SAM, CIP | + | Commensal | 7973 | B2 | |
| 10 | F2 | AMP, CIP | − | Commensal | 1249 | NT | |
| 12 | OPQ | AMP, CIP | − | Commensal | 224 | C1 | |
| 14 | OPQ | AMP, CIP | − | Commensal | 224 | C1 | |
| 16 | OPQ | CIP | − | Commensal | 224 | C1 | |
| 17 | OPQ | CIP | − | Commensal | 224 | C1 | |
| 18 | CUT | CIP | − | Commensal | 155 | B1 | |
| 19 | F3 | AMP, SAM, CRX, CFO, CRO, CIP | + |
| ETEC | NT | B1 |
| 20 | F3 | AMP, SAM, CRX, CFO, CRO, CIP | + |
| ETEC | 155 | NT |
| 21 | F3 | CIP | − | ETEC | 155 | B1 | |
| 27 | MZG | AMP, SAM, CIP | + | Commensal | 4380 | A3 | |
| 28 | MZG | AMP, SAM, CIP | + | Commensal | 949 | A2 | |
| 30 | MZG | AMP, CRX, CFO, CRO, CIP | + | Commensal | NT | NT | |
| 31 | MZG | AMP, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 4482 | B |
| 33 | MZG | AMP, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | NT | B1 |
| 45 | F4 | AMP, SAM, PPT, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 226 | C2 |
| 46 | F4 | AMP, SAM, PPT, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 1431 | A3 |
| 47 | F4 | CIP | − | Commensal | 224 | B2 | |
| 48 | F4 | CIP | − | Commensal | 1196 | B1 | |
| 49 | F4 | CIP | − | Commensal | 1431 | A3 | |
| 50 | TT | AMP, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 7973 | C2 |
| 51 | TT | AMP, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 7973 | C2 |
| 52 | TT | AMP, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 7973 | C2 |
| 53 | TT | AMP, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 7973 | C2 |
| 54 | TT | AMP, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 7973 | C2 |
| 56 | TT | AMP, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 7973 | C2 |
| 66 | FG | AMP, SAM, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | 7973 | C2 |
| 67 | FG | AMP, SAM, CRX, CFO, CAZ, CRO, CPM, CIP | + |
| Commensal | NT | NT |
AMP: Ampicillin, SAM: Ampicillin/Sulbactan, PPT: Piperacillin/Tazobactan, CRX: Cefuroxime, CFO: Cefoxitin, CAZ: Ceftazidime, CRO: Ceftriaxone, CPM: Cefepime, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, OPQ: Oiapoque, CUT: Cutias, MZG: Mazagão, TT: Tartarugalzinho, FG: Ferreira Gomes, ST: sequence type.
Figure 2PFGE dendogram of demonstrating the genetic relatedness of E. coli isolated from A. gigas in the Brazilian Amazon. F: Fish farm, CUT: Cutias; FG: Ferreira Gomes, MZG: Mazagão; OPQ: Oiapoque; TT: Tartarugalzinho; (A–D): clusters; (A1–C2): subclusters.