Literature DB >> 29608599

Prevalence of mcr-type genes among colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae collected in 2014-2016 as part of the INFORM global surveillance program.

Mark G Wise1, Mark A Estabrook1, Daniel F Sahm1, Gregory G Stone2, Krystyna M Kazmierczak1.   

Abstract

A set of 908 clinically derived colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaeae isolates collected worldwide in 2014-2016 were screened for the presence of the plasmid-borne mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 genes. In total 3.2% (29/908) of the collection were positive for mcr, including 27 Escherichia coli, 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 1 Enterobacter cloacae. Twenty-four isolates possessed genes from the mcr-1 family, including the original mcr-1 (n = 22), as well as mcr-1.2 (n = 1) and mcr-1.5 (n = 1), which each differ from mcr-1 by encoding single amino acid variations. Genes from the mcr-3 family were found in isolates from Thailand, including mcr-3.1 (n = 3) and mcr-3.2 (n = 1). An E. coli isolated from a patient with a urinary tract infection in Colombia contained the recently discovered mcr-5. The full colistin-resistant collection was tested against a panel of antimicrobial agents with ceftazidime-avibactam and tigecycline exhibiting the highest activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29608599      PMCID: PMC5880376          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Use of colistin, which became clinically available in 1959, has historically played a minor role as an anti-infective therapy due to its nephrotoxicity, as well as the availability of alternative antimicrobial agents [1]. However, the recent proliferation of multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens in the clinical setting threatens the efficacy of antibiotics across all classes. To bolster the number of so called “last resort” antimicrobial agents, polymyxins such as colistin are once again being administered clinically due to their potential effectiveness against MDR infections [2]. Until 2015, all characterized colistin resistance mechanisms were chromosomally encoded and thus only limited vertical transmission of resistance was envisioned [3]. However, the discovery by Liu, et al. [4] of the plasmid-borne phosphoethanolamine transferase resistance determinant mcr-1 revealed a mechanism for horizontal spread. MCR-1 and MCR-2, a protein with 80.7% identity to MCR-1 [5], have now been reported in Enterobacteriaceae worldwide [6-8]. In 2017, three additional MCR protein variants have been described, MCR-3 [9], MCR-4 [10] and MCR-5 [11], all isolated from hosts with agricultural origins. To gain further insight into the global prevalence of mcr in enteric bacteria isolated from human clinical samples, colistin-resistant isolates from a large international surveillance study were examined for the presence of these genes.

Material and methods

The INFORM (International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring) global surveillance program monitors antimicrobial resistance to a variety of pathogens isolated from intra-abdominal, urinary tract, skin/soft tissue, lower respiratory tract and, as of 2014, blood infections [12]. During 2014–2016, the program received a total of 44,407 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae including those collected by 87 medical center laboratories located in 18 countries in Europe (n = 21,461), 36 medical center laboratories in 9 countries in the Asia/Pacific region (n = 7,215), 24 medical center laboratories in 6 countries in Latin America (n = 7,180), 17 medical center laboratories in 5 countries in the Middle East/Africa region (n = 3,707) and 26 medical center laboratories in the United States (n = 4,844). All isolate species identifications were confirmed in the central laboratory by MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Waltham, Massachusetts). Not including Serratia spp. and members of the tribe Proteeae (genera Proteus, Providencia and Morganella), which are intrinsically colistin non-susceptible, 934 isolates were found to be resistant to colistin by broth microdilution [13] at an MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL, which is the EUCAST resistance breakpoint for the Enterobacteriaceae [14]. Of these, 908 isolates were available to screen, as no isolates could be obtained from China in 2014–2016 or Hong Kong in 2015–2016 due to export restrictions. The species composition of the complete set included Citrobacter freundii (n = 6), Citrobacter koseri (n = 3), Enterobacter aerogenes (n = 18), Enterobacter asburiae (n = 143), Enterobacter cancerogenus (n = 1), Enterobacter cloacae (n = 165), Enterobacter kobei (n = 11), Escherichia coli (n = 64), Hafnia alvei (n = 1), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 13), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 481) and Klebsiella variicola (n = 2). The collection was investigated for the presence of the colistin-resistance conferring mcr genes by several PCRs. The initial reaction utilized a custom primer set designed to amplify a 143 bp region common to both mcr-1 and mcr-2 (MCR-Univ-F: 5’-CTGTGCCGTGTATGTTCAGC-3’ and MCR-Univ-R: 5’-CACGCCTTTTGAGTCYGAAT-3’). Primers that anneal to 16S rRNA gene (U341F, 5’-CCTACGGGRSGCAGCAG-3’; U519R 5’-GWATTACCGCGGCKGCTG-3’) were included in the reaction as an internal positive control for amplification. Subsequently, a multiplex PCR was employed with primers MCR3-F and MCR3-R [9], and MCR-4 FW and MCR-4 RV [10] to detect the mcr-3 and mcr-4 genes, respectively. This reaction also included the 16S rDNA internal positive control. Finally, the screening for mcr-5 utilized MCR5-intern_fw and MCR5-intern_rev primers [11], along with the internal 16SrDNA control. As external positive controls, synthetic DNA constructs were employed for each of the mcr genes (IDT Inc., Coralville, Iowa). All screen-positive results were confirmed by PCR amplification using custom-designed primers flanking the coding region and sequencing the gene in full (mcr-1, exgenMCR1-F, 5’-CCGYAATTATCCCACCGTTT- 3’ and exgenMCR1-F, 5’-CGCCATGACAAGAGCGATAC-3’; mcr-3, exgenMCR3-F, 5’-TCGTTAGAAAGTGATTGTTGGAC-3’ and exgenMCR3-R, 5’-CCTCTTTCTGATTTGCCCGT-3’; mcr-5, exgenMCR5-F, 5’-AACCGTTGAAAGAAGAGGACA-3’ and exgenMCR5-R, 5’-CCAATGAGCTCGTGATCCCC-3’). Sequence variants were assigned based upon comparison to sequences deposited in the NCBI databases. mcr-positive E. coli underwent multilocus sequence typing based on the partial sequences of adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA, and recA (https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/species/index/ecoli).

Results and discussion

In total, mcr was detected in 29 isolates (3.2%), and included 27 E. coli, 1 K. pneumoniae and 1 E. cloacae collected in 15 countries (Malaysia, 5; Thailand, 5; Spain, 3; Argentina, 2; Italy, 2; Colombia, 2; Germany, 2; Brazil, Hong Kong, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, and Venezuela, 1 each) as part of INFORM in 2014 (n = 14), 2015 (n = 11) and 2016 (n = 4) (Table 1). Twenty-two isolates harbored the original mcr-1 gene, one isolate carried the gene for the single amino acid variant (Q3L) MCR-1.2 [15], and one isolate carried mcr-1.5, that codes for another single amino acid variant, (H452Y). Four E. coli isolates, all originating from Thailand, were found to possess mcr-3, with three harboring the original mcr-3.1 [9] and one possessing the gene coding for the single amino acid variant, MCR-3.2 (T488I). An E. coli strain from Colombia was shown to carry the recently discovered mcr-5 gene [11]. No mcr-2 or mcr-4 genes were identified.
Table 1

mcr positive Enterobacteriaceae collected as part of the INFORM global surveillance program during 2014–2016.

YearCountryOrganismClinical SampleMIC (μg/mL)aMLSTmcr gene productβ-Lactamase contentb
CSTCAZ-AVICAZMEMTGC
2014ColombiaEscherichia coliUrine40.25320.060.25ST641MCR-5CMY-2
2014GermanyEscherichia coliGI tract: appendix>40.060.250.030.12ST46MCR-1NCc
2014Hong KongEscherichia coliBlood40.060.120.030.25ST10MCR-1NC
2014ItalyEscherichia coliWound40.120.250.0150.25ST744MCR-1NC
2014ItalyEscherichia coliBlood40.120.250.0150.25ST453MCR-1.2NC
2014MalaysiaEscherichia coliAbscess40.12160.031ST10MCR-1TEM-OSBLd; CTX-M-15
2014MalaysiaEscherichia coliGangrene40.03160.030.5ST162MCR-1TEM-OSBL; CMY-2
2014PortugalEnterobacter cloacaeWound>40.2510.061NAeMCR-1NC
2014RussiaEscherichia coliPeritoneal fluid>40.1220.030.25ST156MCR-1TEM-OSBL; CTX-M-1
2014South AfricaEscherichia coliWound40.030.50.030.25ST602MCR-1NC
2014SpainEscherichia coliPeritoneal fluid>40.120.250.0150.5ST117MCR-1NC
2014SpainEscherichia coliBlood41640.122ST167MCR-1TEM-OSBL
2014TaiwanEscherichia coliWound40.25320.060.25ST117MCR-1TEM-OSBL; CTX-M-161; CMY-2
2014ThailandKlebsiella pneumoniaeWound40.5640.060.5NAMCR-3.1SHV-OSBL; CTX-M-55
2015ArgentinaEscherichia coliUrine40.120.50.030.25ST48MCR-1.5NC
2015ArgentinaEscherichia coliPeritoneal fluid80.2580.060.5NovelfMCR-1CTX-M-2
2015ColombiaEscherichia coliWound40.120.250.030.5ST744MCR-1NC
2015MalaysiaEscherichia coliBlood40.030.250.030.5ST2705MCR-1NC
2015MalaysiaEscherichia coliWound40.1240.030.25ST5907MCR-1TEM-OSBL; CTX-M-65
2015MalaysiaEscherichia coliPeritoneal fluid40.060.120.030.12ST7187MCR-1NC
2015SpainEscherichia coliEndotracheal aspirate40.120.250.031ST88MCR-1NC
2015ThailandEscherichia coliWound40.5>1280.122ST1193MCR-1CMY-2
2015ThailandEscherichia coliBlood40.1280.030.25ST117MCR-3.2TEM-OSBL; CTX-M-55
2015ThailandEscherichia coliAbscess40.12160.060.25ST410MCR-3.1CTX-M-55
2015VenezuelaEscherichia coliAbscess40.120.250.030.5ST7973MCR-1NC
2016BrazilEscherichia coliPeritoneal fluid40.120.250.030.25NovelgMCR-1NC
2016GermanyEscherichia coliWound40.120.250.030.25ST1775MCR-1NC
2016PolandEscherichia coliWound40.120.250.060.25ST12MCR-1NC
2016ThailandEscherichia coliBlood40.12160.120.12ST4546MCR-3.1TEM-OSBL; CTX-M-55

aMICs performed via broth microdilution (13); CST, colistin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime with 4 μg/mL avibactam; MEM, meropenem; TGC, tigecycline.

bAs part of INFORM, meropenem non-susceptible, ceftazidime-resistant, and phenotypically positive ESBL isolates were screened for genes encoding acquired extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases, serine carbapenemases (KPC, OXA-48, GES), and metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) by PCR and DNA sequencing as previously described (16).

cNC = not characterized

dOSBL = original spectrum β-lactamase (eg. TEM-1, SHV-1, SHV-11)

eNA = not applicable

fSingle-locus variant (novel fumC) of E. coli ST117

gSingle-locus variant (novel purA) of pathogenic E. coli ST131

aMICs performed via broth microdilution (13); CST, colistin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime with 4 μg/mL avibactam; MEM, meropenem; TGC, tigecycline. bAs part of INFORM, meropenem non-susceptible, ceftazidime-resistant, and phenotypically positive ESBL isolates were screened for genes encoding acquired extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases, serine carbapenemases (KPC, OXA-48, GES), and metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) by PCR and DNA sequencing as previously described (16). cNC = not characterized dOSBL = original spectrum β-lactamase (eg. TEM-1, SHV-1, SHV-11) eNA = not applicable fSingle-locus variant (novel fumC) of E. coli ST117 gSingle-locus variant (novel purA) of pathogenic E. coli ST131 As part of the INFORM surveillance program, organisms non-susceptible to meropenem, resistant to ceftazidime, and/or positive for ESBL activity qualify for β-lactamase gene screening. Thirteen of the 29 mcr positive isolates qualified and were screened for genes encoding acquired ESBLs, AmpC β-lactamases, serine carbapenemases (blaKPC, blaOXA-48, blaGES), and metallo-β-lactamases by PCR and DNA sequencing, as previously described [16]. Nine mcr-positive isolates were found to carry CTX-M-type ESBLs either alone or in combination with AmpC-type β-lactamases and/or original-spectrum β-lactamases (OSBL) of the TEM or SHV type. Four possessed a CMY-2 AmpC-type enzyme either alone or with a TEM-OSBL, and in one case with a CTX-M-161 enzyme. None of the mcr-positive isolates carried carbapenemases. Of note, each of the four mcr-3 gene family-harboring isolates also carried the CTX-M-55 ESBL variant, known to be common in Asia especially in E. coli isolated from veterinary sources [17]. All mcr containing isolates were susceptible to meropenem (MIC < 2 μg/mL) and doripenem (MIC < 2 μg/mL), and 62.1% (18/29) were susceptible to both ceftazidime (MIC < 8 μg/mL) and aztreonam (MIC < 8 μg/mL) by CLSI breakpoints [18]. However, the addition of 4 μg/mL avibactam rendered 100% of the isolates susceptible (MIC < 8 μg/mL) to ceftazidime (using FDA recommended breakpoints [19]). All isolates harboring mcr were also susceptible (MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL) to tigecycline (using FDA recommended breakpoints [20]). The in vitro activity of several antimicrobials against the full set of 908 colistin-resistant isolates is given in Table 2. Ceftazidime-avibactam, along with tigecycline, were the most active agents against these isolates. The addition of avibactam to ceftazidime rendered 97.5% of the population susceptible (FDA breakpoints [19]), as compared to just 43.8% susceptibility with ceftazidime alone (CLSI breakpoints [18]).
Table 2

In vitro activity of selected antimicrobials against 908 colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae collected worldwide during 2014–2016.

DrugaMIC Interpretive criteria (S/I/R) a% Susceptible% Intermediate% ResistantMIC 50μg/mLMIC 90μg/mLMIC Rangeμg/mL
Amikacin≤16/32/≥6478.611.310.12> 320.5 - >32
Ceftazidime≤4 /8/≥1643.92.054.132> 128≤0.015 - >128
Ceftazidime-avibactamb≤8 /na/≥1697.7na2.30.252≤0.015 - >128
Colistin≤2 /na/≥40na100.08> 84 - >8
Levofloxacin≤2 /4 /≥852.62.944.52> 80.015 - >8
Meropenem≤2 /4/≥870.43.226.50.12> 80.008 - >8
Tigecycline≤2 /4/≥895.64.00.40.520.03–8

aMICs were interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints [18], with the exception of ceftazidime-avibactam, for which MICs were interpreted using criteria according to the FDA [19], colistin for which EUCAST breakpoints were utilized [14] and tigecycline, for which MICs were interpreted using FDA criteria [20]; S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; na, not applicable (no intermediate breakpoint).

bAvibactam concentration fixed at 4 μg/mL

aMICs were interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints [18], with the exception of ceftazidime-avibactam, for which MICs were interpreted using criteria according to the FDA [19], colistin for which EUCAST breakpoints were utilized [14] and tigecycline, for which MICs were interpreted using FDA criteria [20]; S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; na, not applicable (no intermediate breakpoint). bAvibactam concentration fixed at 4 μg/mL The mcr-positive E. coli were distributed among several lineages, with the ST10 clonal complex (including ST167, ST744 and ST48) the most abundant (n = 6). mcr-harboring E. coli from this group has been reported on numerous occasions, for example ST10 from human clinical samples in China [21], ST744 from human and cattle-associated samples in Europe [22, 23], ST167 from human infections in Spain and China [24, 25], as well as ST48 from hospital sewage and human clinical samples, in China and Switzerland, respectively [26, 27]. Additional worldwide clones previously shown to harbor mcr were also confirmed here, and include ST641 [28], ST410 [29,30], and ST156 [31, 32]. Our screening identified two mcr-harboring ST117 E. coli (and a ST117 single-locus variant with a novel fumC), one of which carried the MCR-3.2 gene. ST117 is a clonal group associated with poultry disease [33] and mcr-type genes have only rarely been observed in this clone [27, 34]. Of particular interest, one isolate from Brazil typed as a single locus variant (novel purA) of the pathogenic E. coli ST131 [35]. ST131 often exhibits an extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype and frequently possess CTX-M-15; however, this Brazilian isolate was susceptible to third-generation cephalosporins. In general, the fact that mcr-type genes have been found in E. coli of such diverse STs from food, human and animal specimens suggests the spread of these genes is linked more to successful plasmids and mobile elements rather than single specific E. coli clones [27]. Overall, the prevalence of mcr observed here is in accordance with previous reports from large global surveillance studies. For example, Castanheira, et al. noted that 4.9% (19/390) of a worldwide colistin-resistant collection of E. coli and K. pneumoniae from the SENTRY program contained mcr-1, and 32.3% (19/59) of the resistant E. coli contained this gene [36]. mcr was also enriched in the colistin-resistant E. coli population examined here, as 42.2% (27/64) of the resistant isolates from this species harbored mcr with the remainder presumably possessing a chromosomally-encoded resistance determinant. It should be noted that mcr has been discovered in isolates susceptible to colistin [37], so the actual frequency of occurrence could be higher. In this study, mcr-1 was observed exclusively in E. coli except for an E. cloacae isolate originating from Portugal. Until recently, mcr-1 positive E. cloacae were only reported from Asia [38, 39]; however, the geographic range was expanded with the discovery of a clinical E. cloacae isolate with mcr-1 in France [40]. The mcr-3 harboring E. coli and K. pneumoniae from Thailand confirm the previous report of the presence of this gene in clinical isolates from this country [9]. Finally, finding mcr-5 in a Colombian E. coli clinical isolate expands both its geographic and host range, as at the time of this writing mcr-5 has only been confirmed in Salmonella enterica Paratyphi B isolated from food animals and food products in Germany, and in E. coli from porcine clinical specimens in Japan [41]. This gene was found in silico to be present the genome of a Cupriavidus gilardii from the U.S., and mcr-5 has been reported to be located on a unique Tn3-type transposon in both S. enterica Paratyphi B and C. gilardii [11]. Although we did not sequence this complete region, the forward mcr-5 flanking primer utilized to amplify the full coding region overlaps the 3’ end of the chromate reductase gene, chrB, directly upstream of mcr-5 in the Tn3-type transposon, and the reverse flanking primer anneals to the 5’ portion of the MFS-type transporter gene, immediately downstream of mcr-5 in the transposon arrangement [11], suggesting a similar genetic orientation in this Colombian strain. In summary, this report confirms the global spread of mcr. Notably we did not find the co-existence of mcr with any carbapenemase genes, although co-carriage is being increasingly reported, including mcr-1 with blaNDM in Enterobacteriaceae from the U.S. and China [32, 42–46], as well as mcr-1 and blaKPC in isolates from Singapore [47]. Continual surveillance of this recently recognized threat to public health is warranted as MDR bacteria that acquire mcr will leave few treatment options.
  41 in total

1.  Escherichia coli ST167 carrying plasmid mobilisable mcr-1 and blaCTX-M-15 resistance determinants isolated from a human respiratory infection.

Authors:  Rosario Sánchez-Benito; M Rocío Iglesias; Narciso M Quijada; Maria J Campos; María Ugarte-Ruiz; Marta Hernández; Carmen Pazos; David Rodríguez-Lázaro; Eugenio Garduño; Lucas Domínguez; Alberto Quesada
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 5.283

2.  Ciprofloxacin-resistant and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli ST410 strain carrying the mcr-1 gene associated with bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Igor Vasconcelos Rocha; Carlos Alberto das Neves Andrade; Túlio de Lima Campos; Antonio Mauro Rezende; Nilma Cintra Leal; Cláudia Fernanda de Lacerda Vidal; Danilo Elias Xavier
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  First report of an Escherichia coli strain from swine carrying an OXA-181 carbapenemase and the colistin resistance determinant MCR-1.

Authors:  Sandra Pulss; Torsten Semmler; Ellen Prenger-Berninghoff; Rolf Bauerfeind; Christa Ewers
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016.

Authors:  Basil Britto Xavier; Christine Lammens; Rohit Ruhal; Samir Kumar-Singh; Patrick Butaye; Herman Goossens; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-07-07

5.  mcr-1 in Multidrug-Resistant blaKPC-2-Producing Clinical Enterobacteriaceae Isolates in Singapore.

Authors:  Jocelyn Qi-Min Teo; Rick Twee-Hee Ong; Eryu Xia; Tse-Hsien Koh; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Shannon Jing-Yi Lee; Tze-Peng Lim; Andrea Lay-Hoon Kwa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Trends in susceptibility of Escherichia coli from intra-abdominal infections to ertapenem and comparators in the United States according to data from the SMART program, 2009 to 2013.

Authors:  Sibylle H Lob; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Robert E Badal; Meredith A Hackel; Samuel K Bouchillon; Douglas J Biedenbach; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Antibiotic regimens for treatment of infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens: An evidence-based literature review.

Authors:  Mandana Izadpanah; Hossein Khalili
Journal:  J Res Pharm Pract       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Nationwide high prevalence of CTX-M and an increase of CTX-M-55 in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with community-onset infections in Chinese county hospitals.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Beiwen Zheng; Lina Zhao; Zeqing Wei; Jinru Ji; Lanjuan Li; Yonghong Xiao
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Colistin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Carrying the mcr-1 Gene among Patients in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Sally C Y Wong; Herman Tse; Jonathan H K Chen; Vincent C C Cheng; Pak-Leung Ho; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  mcr-1 and blaKPC-3 in Escherichia coli Sequence Type 744 after Meropenem and Colistin Therapy, Portugal.

Authors:  Marta Tacão; Rafael Dos Santos Tavares; Pedro Teixeira; Inês Roxo; Elmano Ramalheira; Sónia Ferreira; Isabel Henriques
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  20 in total

1.  The Search for a Practical Method for Colistin Susceptibility Testing: Have We Found It by Going Back to the Future?

Authors:  Michael J Satlin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  The rise and spread of mcr plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance.

Authors:  Sue C Nang; Jian Li; Tony Velkov
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 7.624

3.  Evaluation of the NG-Test MCR-1 Lateral Flow Assay and EDTA-Colistin Broth Disk Elution Methods To Detect Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance among Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates.

Authors:  Alexander J Fenwick; Yehudit Bergman; Shawna Lewis; Rebecca Yee; Anne-Catrin Uhlemann; Nicolynn Cole; Peggy Kohner; Carly Ordak; Daniel A Green; Audrey N Schuetz; Romney Humphries; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Characterization of mcr-5-Harboring Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Typhimurium Isolates from Animal and Food Origin in Germany.

Authors:  Maria Borowiak; Jens A Hammerl; Carlus Deneke; Jennie Fischer; Istvan Szabo; Burkhard Malorny
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Breaking antimicrobial resistance by disrupting extracytoplasmic protein folding.

Authors:  R Christopher D Furniss; Nikol Kaderabkova; Declan Barker; Patricia Bernal; Evgenia Maslova; Amanda A A Antwi; Helen E McNeil; Hannah L Pugh; Laurent Dortet; Jessica M A Blair; Gerald Larrouy-Maumus; Ronan R McCarthy; Diego Gonzalez; Despoina A I Mavridou
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Plasmidic resistance to colistin mediated by mcr-1 gene in Escherichia coli clinical isolates in Argentina: A retrospective study, 2012-2018.

Authors:  Diego Faccone; Melina Rapoport; Ezequiel Albornoz; Federico Celaya; Juan De Mendieta; Denise De Belder; Celeste Lucero; Sonia Gomez; Diego Danze; Fernando Pasteran; Alejandra Corso
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2020-09-23

7.  Evaluation of a Screening Method for the Detection of Colistin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Stool.

Authors:  Sarah E Turbett; Lisa Desrosiers; Catherine Andrews-Dunleavey; Margaret Becker; Allison Taylor Walker; Douglas Esposito; Kate Russell Woodworth; John A Branda; Eric Rosenberg; Edward T Ryan; Regina LaRocque
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.835

8.  Molecular Epidemiological Insights into Colistin-Resistant and Carbapenemases-Producing Clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates.

Authors:  Domiziana Di Tella; Manuela Tamburro; Giuliana Guerrizio; Incoronata Fanelli; Michela Lucia Sammarco; Giancarlo Ripabelli
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  An overview of colistin resistance, mobilized colistin resistance genes dissemination, global responses, and the alternatives to colistin: A review.

Authors:  Mohammad H Gharaibeh; Shoroq Q Shatnawi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-11-08

10.  Specialization of small non-conjugative plasmids in Escherichia coli according to their family types.

Authors:  Catherine Branger; Alice Ledda; Typhaine Billard-Pomares; Benoît Doublet; Valérie Barbe; David Roche; Claudine Médigue; Guillaume Arlet; Erick Denamur
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2019-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.