| Literature DB >> 35453980 |
Larisa Renata Pantea-Roșan1, Simona Gabriela Bungau2,3, Andrei-Flavius Radu2,4, Vlad Alin Pantea5, Mădălina Ioana Moisi4, Cosmin Mihai Vesa4, Tapan Behl6, Aurelia Cristina Nechifor7, Elena Emilia Babes1, Manuela Stoicescu1, Daniela Gitea3, Diana Carina Iovanovici2, Cristiana Bustea4.
Abstract
The incidence of the no-reflow (NR) phenomenon varies depending on the diagnostic criteria used. If just the angiographic criteria are considered (i.e., a degree of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction ≤2), it will be found that the incidence of NR is quite low; on the other hand, when the myocardial NR is taken into account (i.e., a decrease in the quality of myocardial reperfusion expressed by the degree of myocardial blush), the real incidence is higher. Thus, the early establishment of a diagnosis of NR and the administration of specific treatment can lead to its reversibility. Otherwise, regardless of the follow-up period, patients with NR have a poor prognosis. In the present work, we offer a comprehensive perspective on diagnostic tools for NR detection, for improving the global management of patients with arterial microvasculature damage, which is a topic of major interest in the cardiology field, due to its complexity and its link with severe clinical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; diagnostic methods; echocardiogram; electrocardiogram; myocardial blush grade; no-reflow phenomenon; thrombolysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35453980 PMCID: PMC9029120 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1PRISMA 2020 flow diagram describing literature selection.
The incidence rate ratio of the no-reflow phenomenon.
| Patients (No.) | Diagnostic Method | Incidence | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEMI | No-Reflow | Normal Flow | |||
| 126 | 47 | 79 | MCE | 37 | Ito et al., 1996 [ |
| 1658 | 491 | 1167 | PCI | 42 | Yang et al., 2020 [ |
| 5997 | 128 | 5869 | 2.1 | Cenko et al., 2016 [ | |
| 203 | 38 | 165 | 18.7 | Li et al., 2018 [ | |
| 291,380 | 6553 | 284,827 | 2.3 | Harrison et al., 2013 [ | |
| 93 | 28 | 65 | 30 | Morishima et al.,1995 [ | |
| 126 | 47 | 79 | 37 | Ito et al., 1996 [ | |
| 143 | 24 | 119 | 13.9 | Rossington et al., 2020 [ | |
| 733 | 54 | 679 | 16.1 | Liang et al., 2017 [ | |
| 347 | 110 | 237 | 32 | Rezkalla et al., 2010 [ | |
| 100 | 27 | 73 | 2.7 | Mahmoud et al., 2019 [ | |
| 44 | 11 | 33 | MRI | 25 | Wu et al., 1998 [ |
STEMI, Segment elevation myocardial infarction; MCE, Myocardial contrast echocardiography; PCI, Percutaneous coronary intervention; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2The main pathophysiological mechanisms involved in no-reflow (NR) apparition in STEMI after PCI, mainly occurring because of pre-existing lesions or other favoring factors, or worsened by the procedure itself. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 3Predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon. ADMA, asymmetric dimethylarginine; CV, Cardiovascular; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; MI, myocardial infarction; NO, nitric oxide; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Figure 4Characteristic aspects of no-reflow phenomenon diagnosis based on ECG: (a) normal ECG without ST segment changes (isoelectric); (b) ECG in a subject diagnosed with STEMI at admission showing anterior ST segment elevation of 6 mm (precordial leads V1-V6); (c) the same patient from (b)—ECG at 2 h after PPCI of the culprit lesion showing persistent ST segment elevation of 5–6 mm (precordial leads V1-V6) without expected ST segment resolution of more than 70%.
Figure 5No-reflow phenomenon appear at the circumflex artery (indicated by the red arrow).
Diagnostic methods of the no-reflow phenomenon.
| Diagnostic | Characteristic, Observations | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| ECG |
Definition of the NR phenomenon: Persistence of the ST segment after perfusion of the culprit coronary artery disease by thrombolysis or coronary angiography. ST segment resolution recorded at 1 h after PCI is expected to exceed 70%. An ST segment resolution less than 70% at 1 h is a marker of NR. A successful myocardial reperfusion involves rapid ST segment resolution, parameter very specific (91%), sensitivity moderate (77%). | Caiazzo et al., 2020, |
| Coronary angiography |
Enhances semiquantitative assessment of the epicardial coronary blood flow. A suboptimal TIMI flow grade and blush grade, as well as a prolonged “TIMI frame count” indicate the detection of NR. Even if the sensitivity of TIMI flow evaluation is modest, corroboration between MBG grade and ST segment evaluation has a prognostic impact independent of the revascularization method, an aspect that requires accurate assessment of the two elements. MBG 2 to 3 is associated with a rapid ST segment resolution >70%, correlated with a favorable prognosis. CTFC is the summed frame count from the interventional opening of the coronary artery responsible for the MI to the crossing of the contrast substance distally post-revascularization. CTFC is considered the “gold standard” for NR evaluation. Routine assessment of anterior descending artery CTFC compared to the other epicardial coronary arteries is required due to its importance and size. An extended frame count above 20 is a criterion for the detection of NR. | Gupta et al., 2016 |
|
| ||
| MCE |
Absence or poor presence of the contrast substance administered during myocardial echocardiography indicates NR. We should assess the success of post-STEMI myocardial reperfusion compared to coronary angiography. | Kaul et al., 2006 |
| Intracardiac Echocardiography |
The reversal of systolic flow, anterograde reduction of systolic flow, and diastolic flow with a rapidly decelerating slope defines the NR phenomenon. Post PPCI patients with NR due to distal microembolization will present slow intracoronary flow velocity throughout the cardiac cycle. | Ramjane et al., 2008 [ |
| CMRI |
Provides highly accurate assessment of myocardial tissue. Detects the presence and extension of the infarcted area, tissue oedema present in the infarct area, and MVO as the expression of the NR phenomenon. First contrast agent injection illustrates myocardial perfusion, while delayed contrast myocardial MRI reveals myocardial necrosis. High spatial resolution allows assessment of the transmural extent of the NR, as well as the infarcted area. | Wu et al., 2012 [ |
| SPECT |
Good accuracy in assessing the degree of myocardial flow, as well as the presence of vascular micro-obstruction. Reproduces the degree of NR. NR appears as vascular micro-obstruction characterized by hypo-amplification due to reduced blood flow. | Shimizu et al., 2006 [ |
| PET |
Highly accurate for NR detection. Non-invasive diagnostic technique without major adverse effects. Shows in detail the hypoxic myocardial territory but it is less used in current practice due to the high cost. | Jeremy et al., 1990 [ |
ECG, electrocardiogram; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; MBG, myocardial blush grade; CTFC, corrected TIMI frame count; MCE, myocardial contrast echocardiography; STEMI, segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; CMRI, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; SPECT, single photon emission computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography, NR, no-reflow; MVO, microvascular obstruction.