Literature DB >> 15145103

Myocardial contrast echocardiography with a new calibration method can estimate myocardial viability in patients with myocardial infarction.

Akio Yano1, Hiroshi Ito, Katsuomi Iwakura, Ryusuke Kimura, Kouji Tanaka, Atsunori Okamura, Shigeo Kawano, Tohru Masuyama, Kenshi Fujii.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We have developed a novel calibration technique applicable for myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). We assessed the value of this technique in the recognition of myocardial infarction (MI) and its spatial extent, and we also performed a validation study in normal subjects.
BACKGROUND: The heterogeneity of contrast intensity (CI) among myocardial segments limits the clinical use of MCE.
METHODS: We performed MCE with a slow-bolus injection of Levovist and recorded end-systolic harmonic power Doppler images at intervals of four heart beats in 15 normal volunteers and 30 patients with MI. We divided the left ventricular (LV) wall into 12 segments and placed the region of interest in the subendocardial region in each segment and in the adjacent LV cavity. We measured calibrated CI (dB) by subtracting the cavity CI from myocardial CI.
RESULTS: The mean intersegmental difference in myocardial CI was 15.8 dB at baseline, whereas it was reduced to 6.3 dB after calibration (p < 0.01). Calibrated CI was higher in the kinetic segments than in the akinetic segments (-14.5 +/- 2.3 dB [range -18.7 to -9.9 dB] vs. -22.5 +/- 2.6 dB [-27.8 to -17.7 dB], p < 0.001), and -18.0 dB was the optimal cutoff point to discriminate these from each other. Color-coded mapping of calibrated CI may identify the spatial extent of persistently akinetic myocardium as areas of calibrated CI of <or=-18.0 dB.
CONCLUSIONS: This new calibration method reduces the intersegmental difference in CI in normal subjects. Calibrated CI provides an estimate of persistently akinetic myocardium in patients with MI, and its color-coded mapping is comprehensive and identifies the spatial extent of MI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15145103     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  11 in total

Review 1.  Leveraging the power of ultrasound for therapeutic design and optimization.

Authors:  Charles F Caskey; Xiaowen Hu; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Myocardial blood volume reserve by intravenous contrast echocardiography predicts improvement in left ventricular function in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yoko Miyata-Fukuoka; Hiroya Kawai; Osamu Iseki; Yoshio Yamanaka; Yoshiaki Ueda; Mitsuhiro Yokoyama; Ken-Ichi Hirata
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-07-09

3.  Quantifying myocardial perfusion using contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  L Galiuto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Parametric harmonic-to-fundamental ratio contrast echocardiography: a novel approach to identification and accurate measurement of left ventricular area under variable levels of ultrasound signal attenuation.

Authors:  Shiro Yoshifuku; Shigao Chen; Eileen M McMahon; Akiko Yoshikawa; Partho P Sengupta; Josef Korinek; Marek Belohlavek
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Participation of mast cells in angiogenesis in the border zone of myocardial infarction in rats.

Authors:  Takayoshi Yamaki; Masumi Iwai-Takano; Hiroyuki Yaoita; Kazuei Ogawa; Hiroko Tajima; Yasuchika Takeishi; Yukio Maruyama
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Authors:  M-X Tang; H Mulvana; T Gauthier; A K P Lim; D O Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; E Stride
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  A fundamental study for quantitative measurement of ultrasound contrast concentration by low mechanical index contrast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamada; Kaoru Komuro; Mariko Taniguchi; Ayumi Uranishi; Hiroshi Komatsu; Toshihiko Asanuma; Fuminobu Ishikura; Hisao Onozuka; Taisei Mikami; Hiroyuki Tsutsui; Shintaro Beppu
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 8.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Quantitative segmental analysis of myocardial perfusion to differentiate stress cardiomyopathy from acute myocardial infarction: A myocardial contrast echocardiography study.

Authors:  Sun-Yang Min; Jong-Min Song; Yewon Shin; Min-Jung Sin; Dae-Hee Kim; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  The diagnosis and treatment of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Khalill Ramjane; Lei Han; Chang Jin
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.