Literature DB >> 20488311

5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Gjin Ndrepepa1, Klaus Tiroch, Massimiliano Fusaro, Dritan Keta, Melchior Seyfarth, Robert A Byrne, Jürgen Pache, Patricia Alger, Julinda Mehilli, Albert Schömig, Adnan Kastrati.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of no-reflow phenomenon on 5-year mortality among patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This impact was also assessed in relation to infarct size.
BACKGROUND: The impact of no-reflow on long-term mortality in patients with STEMI has been insufficiently studied.
METHODS: This study included 1,406 patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI. No-reflow was diagnosed using angiographic criteria. Infarct size was measured with single-photon emission computed tomography imaging 7 to 14 days after the acute event. The primary outcome was 5-year mortality.
RESULTS: The no-reflow phenomenon was diagnosed in 410 patients (29%). Infarct size was 15.0% (6.0% to 29.0%) of the left ventricle in the no-reflow group versus 8.0% (2.0% to 21.0%) of the left ventricle in the reflow group (p < 0.001). There were 132 deaths during follow-up. Of them, 59 deaths occurred among patients with no-reflow and 73 deaths occurred among patients with reflow (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year mortality 18.2% and 9.5%, respectively; odds ratio: 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 2.82; p < 0.001). The Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for infarct size among other variables identified the no-reflow phenomenon as an independent correlate of 5-year mortality (hazard ratio: 1.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 2.36; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI, no-reflow phenomenon is a strong predictor of 5-year mortality. No-reflow phenomenon after PCI provides prognostic information that is independent of and beyond that provided by infarct size. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20488311     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  98 in total

1.  Acute coronary syndromes: No-reflow--an ominous sign of cardiac dysfunction.

Authors:  Michael Magro; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  The treatment of acute myocardial infarction: the Past, the Present, and the Future.

Authors:  Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2012-04

3.  The value of plasma D-dimer level on admission in predicting no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term prognosis in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ayhan Erkol; Vecih Oduncu; Burak Turan; Alev Kılıçgedik; Dicle Sırma; Gökhan Gözübüyük; Can Yücel Karabay; Ahmet Guler; Cihan Dündar; Kürşat Tigen; Selçuk Pala; Cevat Kırma
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Multilayer longitudinal strain can help predict the development of no-reflow in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation.

Authors:  Adem Atıcı; Hasan Ali Barman; Emre Erturk; Omer Faruk Baycan; Serdar Fidan; Koray Celal Demirel; Ramazan Asoglu; Koray Demir; Fatih Ozturk; Ali Elitok; Erugrul Okuyan; Irfan Sahin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a review of current clinical applications.

Authors:  Kazumasa Kurogi; Masanobu Ishii; Nobuyasu Yamamoto; Kenshi Yamanaga; Kenichi Tsujita
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-01-17

6.  Comparison of syntax score and syntax score II to predict "no reflow phenomenon" in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mahmut Yesin; Metin Çağdaş; Macit Kalçık; Mahmut Uluganyan; Süleyman Çağan Efe; İbrahim Rencüzoğulları; Yavuz Karabağ; Mustafa Ozan Gürsoy; Süleyman Karakoyun
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Transient no reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Jinnouchi; Kenichi Sakakura; Hiroshi Wada; Kenshiro Arao; Norifumi Kubo; Yoshitaka Sugawara; Hiroshi Funayama; Shin-ichi Momomura; Junya Ako
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  The relationship between serum rheumatoid factor level and no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Alaa Quisi; Gökhan Alıcı
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  The relationship between epicardial adipose tissue and ST-segment resolution in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ertuğrul Zencirci; Aycan Esen Zencirci; Aleks Değirmencioğlu; Gültekin Karakuş; Murat Uğurlucan; Kıvılcım Özden; Aysun Erdem; Ahmet Ümit Güllü; Ahmet Ekmekçi; Yalçın Velibey; Hatice Betül Erer; Seden Çelik; Ahmet Akyol
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Left circumflex coronary artery is protected against no-reflow phenomenon following percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nagai; Takuro Hirano; Mayumi Tsunoda; Haruhiko Hosaka; Yoshikazu Kishino; Takaharu Katayama; Keisuke Matsumura; Takashi Miyagawa; Shun Kohsaka; Toshihisa Anzai; Keiichi Fukuda; Masahiro Suzuki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.