Literature DB >> 35450185

Comparing surgical efficiencies between phacoemulsification systems: a single surgeon retrospective study of 2000 eyes.

Luis Escaf-Jaraba1,2, Jorge Escobar-DiazGranados1,2, Bartolomé Valdemarín1,2.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare under similar conditions intraoperative surgical efficiencies metrics between an active fluidics and a gravity based phacoemulsification systems.
METHODS: Adult patients who were diagnosed with a cataract that compromised visual acuity inferior to 20/40 were included in the study. Patients were excluded from the study if they had a history of severe retinal disorders, clinically significant corneal endothelial dystrophy or history of corneal disease. All phacoemulsification surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Both phacoemulsification systems used the 0.9 mm 45-degree aspiration bypass system Intrepid Balanced tip and the 0.9 mm Intrepid Ultra infusion sleeve. All cataracts were classified using the Lens Opacities Classification System III, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and aspiration fluids were measured in each surgery.
RESULTS: Totally 2000 eyes were included in the study. Phacoemulsification was performed in 1000 (50%) eyes with an active fluid dynamics system and in 1000 (50%) eyes with a gravity-based fluidic system. Mean CDE until fracture of the lens was 1.1 and 1.9 percent-seconds and total mean CDE used was 5.6 and 7.2 percent-seconds using an active fluidics dynamics system and gravity-based fluidic system, respectively (P<0.001). Mean aspiration fluids used were 70 mL using an active fluidics dynamics system and 85 mL using a gravity-based fluidic system (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study evidences that surgeries performed under similar conditions (same surgeon, phaco tip and sleeve) with the active fluidics dynamics system required significantly lower CDE and aspiration fluids. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aspiration fluids; cumulative dissipated energy; ophthalmology; phacoemulsification; surgical efficiencies

Year:  2022        PMID: 35450185      PMCID: PMC8995727          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.04.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  14 in total

1.  Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: relation to preoperative and intraoperative parameters.

Authors:  T Walkow; N Anders; S Klebe
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Prospective study of Centurion® versus Infiniti® phacoemulsification systems: surgical and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Lawrence J Oh; Chu Luan Nguyen; Eugene Wong; Samuel S Y Wang; Ian C Francis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Effects of phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium using phacofracture and phaco chop techniques.

Authors:  G Pirazzoli; D D'Eliseo; M Ziosi; R Acciarri
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Torsional power study using CENTURION phacoemulsification technology.

Authors:  Jason D Jensen; Dallas S Shi; Mark S Robinson; Gregory D Kramer; Brian Zaugg; Brian C Stagg; Jeff H Pettey; William R Barlow; Randall J Olson
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Experimental anterior chamber maintenance in active versus passive phacoemulsification fluidics systems.

Authors:  C Manuel Nicoli; Ramon Dimalanta; Kevin M Miller
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-fluidics.

Authors:  Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas; Manuel Garza-Leon; Manuel Saenz-de-Viteri; Juan C Solis-S; Rosario Gulias-Cañizo; Hugo Quiroz-Mercado
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Correlation of nuclear density using the Lens Opacity Classification System III versus Scheimpflug imaging with phacoemulsification parameters.

Authors:  Monika Gupta; Jagat Ram; Arun Jain; Jaspreet Sukhija; Manish Chaudhary
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control.

Authors:  Kerry D Solomon; Ramón Lorente; Doug Fanney; Robert J Cionni
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Erik Anderson; Geoffrey Hill; John J Chen; Thomas Patrianakos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-22

10.  Intraocular Pressure Changes during Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Comparison between Two Different Patient Interfaces.

Authors:  Chiara De Giacinto; Rossella D'Aloisio; Alessandro Bova; Tommaso Candian; Alberto Armando Perrotta; Daniele Tognetto
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.