Literature DB >> 29181313

Prospective study of Centurion® versus Infiniti® phacoemulsification systems: surgical and visual outcomes.

Lawrence J Oh1,2, Chu Luan Nguyen1,2, Eugene Wong1, Samuel S Y Wang1, Ian C Francis1,2,3.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate surgical outcomes (SOs) and visual outcomes (VOs) in cataract surgery comparing the Centurion® phacoemulsification system (CPS) with the Infiniti® phacoemulsification system (IPS).
METHODS: Prospective, consecutive study in a single-site private practice. Totally 412 patients undergoing cataract surgery with either the CPS using the 30-degree balanced® tip (n=207) or the IPS using the 30-degree Kelman® tip (n=205). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were documented prospectively up to one month follow-up. Nuclear sclerosis (NS) grade, cumulated dissipated energy (CDE), preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and CDVA at one month were recorded.
RESULTS: CDE was 13.50% less in the whole CPS compared with the whole IPS subcohort. In eyes with NS grade III or greater, CDE was 28.87% less with CPS (n=70) compared with IPS (n=44) (P=0.010). Surgical complications were not statistically different between the two subcohorts (P=0.083), but in the one case of vitreous loss using the CPS, CDVA of 6/4 was achieved at one month. The mean CDVAs (VOs) at one month for NS grade III and above cataracts were -0.17 logMAR (6/4.5) in the CPS and -0.15 logMAR (6/4.5) in the IPS subcohort respectively (P=0.033).
CONCLUSION: CDE is 28.87% less, and VOs are significantly improved, in denser cataracts in the CPS compared with the IPS. The authors recommend the CPS for cases with denser nuclei.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centurion; Infiniti; cumulated dissipated energy; phacoemulsification; visual and surgical outcomes

Year:  2017        PMID: 29181313      PMCID: PMC5686368          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.11.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  17 in total

1.  Optimizing the cataract order of the list in modern surgery.

Authors:  Claire W Ruan; Sai H Win; Katherine E Francis; Ian C Francis
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Phaco-emulsification and aspiration. A new technique of cataract removal. A preliminary report.

Authors:  C D Kelman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Proper method for calculating average visual acuity.

Authors:  J T Holladay
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract.

Authors:  Samantha R de Silva; Yasmin Riaz; Jennifer R Evans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-29

5.  Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control.

Authors:  Kerry D Solomon; Ramón Lorente; Doug Fanney; Robert J Cionni
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  The Lanindar test: a method of evaluating patient suitability for cataract surgery using assisted topical anaesthesia.

Authors:  E C Figueira; N S Sharma; J-L Ooi; K Masselos; K J Y Lee; M L Rosenberg; I C Francis; S L Alexander; N I Ferch; F Stapleton
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Two-speed phacoemulsification for soft cataracts using optimized parameters and procedure step toolbar with the CENTURION Vision System and Balanced Tip.

Authors:  James A Davison
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-27

8.  Cataract Surgery with a New Fluidics Control Phacoemulsification System in Nanophthalmic Eyes.

Authors:  John S M Chang; Jack C M Ng; Vincent K C Chan; Antony K P Law
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-21

9.  Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.

Authors:  Ming Chen; Erik Anderson; Geoffrey Hill; John J Chen; Thomas Patrianakos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-22

10.  Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems.

Authors:  Pooria Sharif-Kashani; Douglas Fanney; Val Injev
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparing surgical efficiencies between phacoemulsification systems: a single surgeon retrospective study of 2000 eyes.

Authors:  Luis Escaf-Jaraba; Jorge Escobar-DiazGranados; Bartolomé Valdemarín
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Active-fluidics-based torsional phacoemulsification in diabetic eyes: A prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Sudarshan Khokhar; Sagnik Sen; Chirakshi Dhull
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Macular perfusion analysed by optical coherence tomography angiography after uncomplicated phacoemulsification: benefits beyond restoring vision.

Authors:  Ana Križanović; Mirjana Bjeloš; Mladen Bušić; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Benedict Rak; Nenad Vukojević
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  A prospective randomized clinical trial of active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC).

Authors:  Yu Luo; Hongyu Li; Wenqian Chen; Yi Gao; Tianju Ma; Zi Ye; Zhaohui Li
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

5.  Active-fluidics versus gravity-fluidics system in phacoemulsification for age-related cataract (AGSPC): study protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Yu Luo; Hongyu Li; Wenqian Chen; Yi Gao; Tianju Ma; Zi Ye; Zhaohui Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.