Literature DB >> 26999336

Torsional power study using CENTURION phacoemulsification technology.

Jason D Jensen1, Dallas S Shi1, Mark S Robinson1, Gregory D Kramer1, Brian Zaugg1, Brian C Stagg1, Jeff H Pettey1, William R Barlow1, Randall J Olson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of varying levels of power on phacoemulsification efficiency using the CENTURION Vision System.
METHODS: Formalin-soaked porcine lenses were divided into 2-mm cubes; 0.9-mm, balanced tips were used. Torsional power levels were tested from 10% to 100% at 10% intervals. Vacuum was set to 550 mmHg, aspiration to 50 ml/min, and intraocular pressure at 50 mmHg. Efficiency (time to lens removal) and chatter (number of lens fragment repulsions from the tip) were determined.
RESULTS: Increasing torsional power up to 60% increased efficiency. This effect was linear from 30 to 60% power (R2  = .90; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in efficiency past 60%. Chatter was highest at 10% power and decreased linearly (R2  = .87; P = 0.007) as power was increased up to 60% power, and chatter did not improve above this power level.
CONCLUSIONS: Power improved efficiency only up to a 60% power level, and then was negligible. Chatter correlated well with power up to the 60% level, so that as power was increased, chatter decreased. Because there are no additional benefits in efficiency past 60% power, and because chatter is minimal at 60% power, we recommend torsional ultrasound at 60% as the optimal power setting for using the CENTURION System for phacoemulsification.l.
© 2016 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal; cataract; cataract extraction; crystalline; lens; mechanical; models; torsion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26999336     DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  7 in total

1.  Prospective study of Centurion® versus Infiniti® phacoemulsification systems: surgical and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Lawrence J Oh; Chu Luan Nguyen; Eugene Wong; Samuel S Y Wang; Ian C Francis
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparing surgical efficiencies between phacoemulsification systems: a single surgeon retrospective study of 2000 eyes.

Authors:  Luis Escaf-Jaraba; Jorge Escobar-DiazGranados; Bartolomé Valdemarín
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  The effect of increasing power when grooving using phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Rhett S Thomson; Brian A Bird; Lance A Stutz; Joshua B Heczko; Ashlie A Bernhisel; William R Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-12

4.  Active-fluidics-based torsional phacoemulsification in diabetic eyes: A prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Sudarshan Khokhar; Sagnik Sen; Chirakshi Dhull
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Optimizing Tip Diameter in Phacoemulsification of Varying Lens Sizes: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Aniket Ramshekar; Joshua Heczko; Ashlie Bernhisel; William Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall Olson; Jeff Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-17

6.  Optimization of Phacoemulsification Tip Gauge on the Oertli CataRhex3 in an in vitro Setting.

Authors:  John S Peterson; Michael R Christensen; Caitlynn Cooper; Christina Mamalis; Ashlie A Bernhisel; Brian Zaugg; William R Barlow; Emilie Ungricht; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-08

7.  Comparisons of the energy efficiency and intraocular safety of two torsional phacoemulsification tips.

Authors:  Yan-Xiu Sun; Rong Cao; Zi-Yuan Liu; Hua-Qin Xia; Yu-Jie Cen; Lu Gao; Dan-Dan Shi
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.086

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.