| Literature DB >> 35439926 |
Jiapeng Yang1,2, Fuwei Zhang1,2, Yajie Ge1,2, Wenhui Yu1,2, Qiqian Xue1,2, Mengting Wang1,2, Hongman Wang1,2, Qingyun Xue1,2, Wei Liu1,2, Zhitao Niu3,4, Xiaoyu Ding5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because chloroplast (cp) genome has more conserved structures than nuclear genome and mitochondrial genome, it is a useful tool in estimating the phylogenetic relationships of plants. With a series of researches for cp genomes, there have been comprehensive understandings about the cp genome features. The genus Bulbophyllum widely distributed in Asia, South America, Australia and other places. Therefore, it is an excellent type genus for studying the effects of geographic isolation.Entities:
Keywords: Bulbophyllum; Chloroplast genome; Geographic isolation; Species evolution
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35439926 PMCID: PMC9016995 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03592-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 5.260
Fig. 1Cp genomes map of Bulbophyllum orchids. The lengths of the cp genomes are shown in the circle. Cp genes at four junctions and SSC regions are colored in
The features of Bulbophyllum cp genomes
| No | Species | Accession | Reference | Cp genome | LSC | IR | SSC | GC content (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no | length (bp) | length (bp) | length (bp) | length (bp) | Total | LSC | IR | SSC | |||
| 1 | LC498826 | Tang et al. (2019) [ | 148,554 | 79,001 | 26,378 | 16,797 | 37.94 | 35.80 | 43.38 | 30.93 | |
| 2 | MW161053 | Tang et al. (2021) [ | 158,524 | 86,200 | 26,846 | 18,632 | 36.76 | 34.47 | 43.05 | 29.26 | |
| 3 | MW161052 | Tang et al. (2021) [ | 156,669 | 84,607 | 26,919 | 18,224 | 36.77 | 34.35 | 43.09 | 29.30 | |
| 4 | MW161050 | Tang et al. (2021) [ | 156,550 | 84,663 | 26,891 | 18,105 | 36.66 | 34.20 | 43.03 | 29.26 | |
| 5 | MW161051 | Tang et al. (2021) [ | 156,142 | 84,240 | 26,838 | 18,226 | 36.81 | 34.44 | 43.05 | 29.40 | |
| 6 | MW822749 | Zhang et al. (2021) [ | 151,224 | 86,017 | 25,855 | 13,497 | 36.98 | 34.45 | 43.21 | 29.25 | |
| 7 | NC_046811 | Kim et al. (2020) [ | 149,548 | 85,760 | 25,824 | 12,140 | 37.00 | 34.41 | 43.17 | 29.00 | |
| 8 | LC642719 | This study | 148,067 | 78,167 | 26,414 | 17,072 | 37.91 | 35.86 | 43.29 | 30.63 | |
| 9 | LC642724 | This study | 147,382 | 77,587 | 26,333 | 17,129 | 37.96 | 35.93 | 43.34 | 30.60 | |
| 10 | LC642721 | This study | 144,380 | 77,399 | 26,437 | 14,107 | 38.02 | 35.79 | 43.22 | 30.76 | |
| 11 | LC642722 | This study | 145,092 | 77,192 | 26,262 | 15,376 | 37.98 | 35.93 | 43.31 | 30.03 | |
| 12 | LC642723 | This study | 147,514 | 77,762 | 26,378 | 16,996 | 38.04 | 36.05 | 43.37 | 30.58 | |
| 13 | LC642720 | This study | 147,494 | 77,664 | 26,290 | 17,250 | 37.88 | 35.87 | 43.32 | 30.34 | |
| 14 | LC642725 | This study | 147,388 | 77,392 | 26,395 | 17,206 | 38.01 | 36.05 | 43.29 | 30.65 | |
| 15 | LC642726 | This study | 146,928 | 77,088 | 26,401 | 17,038 | 37.98 | 35.98 | 43.29 | 30.58 | |
| 16 | LC703293 | This study | 148,255 | 78,074 | 26,366 | 17,449 | 37.83 | 35.84 | 43.32 | 30.19 | |
| 17 | LC556091 | Yang et al. (2020) [ | 148,230 | 78,178 | 26,386 | 17,280 | 37.86 | 35.83 | 43.30 | 30.38 | |
| 18 | LC556092 | Yang et al. (2020) [ | 147,169 | 77,478 | 26,081 | 17,529 | 38.01 | 36.01 | 43.37 | 30.87 | |
| 19 | LC556093 | Yang et al. (2020) [ | 147,464 | 77,564 | 26,403 | 17,094 | 37.92 | 35.89 | 43.25 | 30.68 | |
| 20 | NC_048486 | Zavala-Páez et al. (2020) [ | 147,546 | 82,354 | 25,847 | 13,498 | 36.73 | 34.06 | 43.20 | 28.20 | |
| 21 | NC_048480 | Zavala-Páez et al. (2020) [ | 150,410 | 83,335 | 25,847 | 15,381 | 36.78 | 34.21 | 43.22 | 29.09 | |
| 22 | NC_048481 | Zavala-Páez et al. (2020) [ | 151,112 | 84,492 | 25,465 | 15,690 | 36.72 | 34.26 | 43.13 | 29.13 | |
| 23 | NC_048482 | Zavala-Páez et al. (2020) [ | 150,217 | 83,642 | 26,338 | 13,899 | 36.74 | 34.14 | 43.11 | 28.28 | |
| 24 | NC_048479 | Zavala-Páez et al. (2020) [ | 146,401 | 83,260 | 26,025 | 11,091 | 36.56 | 33.72 | 43.00 | 27.62 | |
| 25 | NC_048483 | Zavala-Páez et al. (2020) [ | 151,493 | 84,868 | 25,542 | 15,541 | 36.66 | 34.17 | 43.09 | 29.11 | |
| 26 | NC_048484 | Zavala-Páez et al. (2020) [ | 146,720 | 83,488 | 25,953 | 11,326 | 36.74 | 34.20 | 42.80 | 27.72 | |
| 27 | NC_048485 | Zavala-Páez et al. (2020) [ | 151,355 | 83,450 | 25,927 | 16,051 | 36.64 | 34.09 | 43.16 | 28.90 | |
Fig. 2Sequence variabilities of non-coding loci among AN and SA clades. Dashed lines indicate top ten hotspots. Blue points indicate common top ten hotspots of two clades
Fig. 3Chronogram and Phylogenetic relationships of 61 angiosperms. a Molecular dating results of 61 angiosperms by BEAST2; b ML tree topology with ML and BI bootstrap values. The first one represents ML bootstrap value and the second one represents BI bootstrap value. * represents 100 bootstrap value
Fig. 4InDels analysis results of Bulbophyllum orchids. a Total InDels lengths with reference D. huoshanense; b InDels distribution densities in different regions of Bulbophyllum orchids; c InDels occurrence rates of different branches in Bulbophyllum
Fig. 5Selective pressure analysis results in Bulbophyllum. a Scatter diagram for dN and dS of 63 cp protein-coding genes from 27 Bulbophyllum orchids with reference D. huoshanense; b Scatter diagram for dN and dS of atpA, psbZ, rpl16 and atpE; c ML tree with positively selective genes in Bulbophyllum branch, AN branch and SA branch, respectively