| Literature DB >> 35397721 |
Janet Durbin1, Tim Aubry2, Beverley Barrett3, Christiane Bergeron-Leclerc4, Catherine Briand5, Rick Goscha6, Terry Krupa7, Jennifer Rae8, Maryann Roebuck2, Alissa Setliff3, Jonathan Scaccia9, Catherine Vallée10, Eric Latimer11.
Abstract
While strengths approaches are important to recovery-oriented practice, implementation can be challenging. This study implemented the strengths model of case management (SMCM) in 11 CM teams and assessed the fidelity of delivery and staff perceptions of the model after 36 months using the SMCM fidelity scale and the Readiness Monitoring Tool. Paired sample t-tests assessed change in fidelity from baseline to 36 months. Adjusted regression analyses compared survey responses of direct and management staff. While fidelity ratings significantly improved across all domains, at 36 months they remained suboptimal in supervision practices and use of model tools. Staff perceptions were generally positive but consistently lower for front-line than management staff. Implementing SMCM into existing case management practice with good fidelity is feasible. However, clear support from management may strengthen staff motivation and delivery. A review of practice later in implementation can flag challenges for sustainability and guide implementation support.Entities:
Keywords: Case management; Fidelity; Implementation; Strengths approach
Year: 2022 PMID: 35397721 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-00968-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Community Ment Health J ISSN: 0010-3853