Literature DB >> 31691055

Assessing the Fidelity of Evidence-Based Practices: History and Current Status of a Standardized Measurement Methodology.

Gary R Bond1, Robert E Drake2.   

Abstract

Evidence-based practices are effective only when implemented faithfully. This paper explicates the history, standardization, and methods for developing and validating measures of fidelity. We overviewed the past 20 years of developing fidelity measures, summarized standardization of the development procedures, and described needed psychometric assessments. Fidelity assessment has become the sine qua non of implementation, technical assistance, and research on evidence-based practices. Researchers have established standardized procedures for scale development and psychometric testing. Widescale use of fidelity measurement remains challenging. The implementation of evidence-based practice and the development and validation of fidelity measures are interdependent. International improvements of mental health care will require attention to both.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based practice; Fidelity; Measurement; Scale development

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31691055     DOI: 10.1007/s10488-019-00991-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health        ISSN: 0894-587X


  21 in total

1.  Implementing the Strengths Model of Case Management: Assessing Practice Three Years After Initial Implementation.

Authors:  Janet Durbin; Tim Aubry; Beverley Barrett; Christiane Bergeron-Leclerc; Catherine Briand; Rick Goscha; Terry Krupa; Jennifer Rae; Maryann Roebuck; Alissa Setliff; Jonathan Scaccia; Catherine Vallée; Eric Latimer
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2022-04-09

2.  Evaluation of an implementation strategy for Individual Placement and Support in the Netherlands: a 30-month observational study.

Authors:  Miljana Vukadin; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Harry W C Michon; Bart Cillekens; Peter M van de Ven; Trees Juurlink; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.144

3.  Recovery-oriented acute inpatient mental health care: Operationalization and measurement.

Authors:  Alan B McGuire; Marina Kukla; Angela L Rollins; Jennifer Garabrant; Nancy Henry; Johanne Eliacin; Laura J Myers; Mindy E Flanagan; Marcia G Hunt; Gayle Y Iwamasa; Sarah M Bauer; Jessica L Carter; Michelle P Salyers
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2021-07-29

4.  Fidelity Assessment Checklist Development for Community Nursing Research in Early Childhood.

Authors:  Lubna Anis; Karen M Benzies; Carol Ewashen; Martha J Hart; Nicole Letourneau
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14

5.  Psychiatric Crisis Care and the More is Less Paradox.

Authors:  Robert E Drake; Gary R Bond
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2021-05-15

6.  Community Implementation of MI-Enhanced Behavior Therapy for Adolescent ADHD: Linking Fidelity to Effectiveness.

Authors:  Margaret H Sibley; Leonard Bickman; Stefany J Coxe; Paulo A Graziano; Pablo Martin
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2020-11-10

7.  The Forensic High and Intensive Care Monitor: Measurement Properties of a Model Fidelity Scale for Contact-Based Care in Forensic Psychiatry.

Authors:  Sylvia Gerritsen; Guy A M Widdershoven; Anne L van Melle; Henrica C W de Vet; Yolande Voskes
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2022-02-16

8.  The Antipsychotic Medication Management Fidelity Scale: Psychometric properties.

Authors:  Torleif Ruud; Karin Drivenes; Robert E Drake; Vegard Øksendal Haaland; Matthew Landers; Bjørn Stensrud; Kristin S Heiervang; Lars Tanum; Gary R Bond
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-11

9.  Fidelity Scale: From Black Box to Holy Grail.

Authors:  Jaap van Weeghel
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-11

10.  Measuring Fidelity to Evidence-Based Practices: Psychometrics.

Authors:  T Ruud; R E Drake; G R Bond
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.