Catherine Briand1, Matthew Menear2. 1. Associate Professor, School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; Researcher, Centre d'études sur la réadaptation, le rétablissement et l'insertion sociale (CÉRRIS), Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec. 2. Student, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In North America and internationally, efforts have been made to reduce the gaps between knowledge of psychosocial evidence-based practices (EBPs) and the delivery of such services in routine mental health practice. Part 2 of this review identifies key issues for stakeholders to consider when implementing comprehensive psychosocial EBPs for people with severe mental illness (SMI). METHOD: A rapid review of the literature was conducted. Searches were carried out in MEDLINE and PsycINFO for reports published between 1990 and 2012 using key words related to SMI, and psychosocial practices and implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to structure findings according to key domains and constructs known to influence the implementation process. RESULTS: The CFIR allowed us to identify 17 issues reflecting more than 30 constructs of the framework that were viewed as influential to the process of implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for people with SMI. Issues arising at different levels of influence (intervention, individual, organizational, and system) and at all phases of the implementation process (planning, engagement, execution, and evaluation) were found to play important roles in implementation. CONCLUSION: The issues identified in this review should be taken into consideration by stakeholders when engaging in efforts to promote uptake of new psychosocial EBPs and to widen the range of effective psychosocial services available in routine mental health care.
OBJECTIVE: In North America and internationally, efforts have been made to reduce the gaps between knowledge of psychosocial evidence-based practices (EBPs) and the delivery of such services in routine mental health practice. Part 2 of this review identifies key issues for stakeholders to consider when implementing comprehensive psychosocial EBPs for people with severe mental illness (SMI). METHOD: A rapid review of the literature was conducted. Searches were carried out in MEDLINE and PsycINFO for reports published between 1990 and 2012 using key words related to SMI, and psychosocial practices and implementation. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to structure findings according to key domains and constructs known to influence the implementation process. RESULTS: The CFIR allowed us to identify 17 issues reflecting more than 30 constructs of the framework that were viewed as influential to the process of implementing evidence-based psychosocial interventions for people with SMI. Issues arising at different levels of influence (intervention, individual, organizational, and system) and at all phases of the implementation process (planning, engagement, execution, and evaluation) were found to play important roles in implementation. CONCLUSION: The issues identified in this review should be taken into consideration by stakeholders when engaging in efforts to promote uptake of new psychosocial EBPs and to widen the range of effective psychosocial services available in routine mental health care.
Authors: W C Torrey; R E Drake; L Dixon; B J Burns; L Flynn; A J Rush; R E Clark; D Klatzker Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Kimberley R Isett; M Audrey Burnam; Brenda Coleman-Beattie; Pamela S Hyde; Joseph P Morrissey; Jennifer Magnabosco; Charles A Rapp; Vijay Ganju; Howard H Goldman Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Alain Lesage; Roger Bland; Ian Musgrave; Egon Jonsson; Mike Kirby; Helen-Maria Vasiliadis Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Janet Durbin; Tim Aubry; Beverley Barrett; Christiane Bergeron-Leclerc; Catherine Briand; Rick Goscha; Terry Krupa; Jennifer Rae; Maryann Roebuck; Alissa Setliff; Jonathan Scaccia; Catherine Vallée; Eric Latimer Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2022-04-09
Authors: Jennifer N Hill; Sara M Locatelli; Barbara G Bokhour; Gemmae M Fix; Jeffrey Solomon; Nora Mueller; Sherri L LaVela Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2018-08-04
Authors: Alfonso González-Valderrama; Cristián Mena; Juan Undurraga; Carlos Gallardo; Pilar Mondaca Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 4.157