| Literature DB >> 35334527 |
Gunda Petraitytė1, Violeta Mikštienė2, Evelina Siavrienė1,2, Loreta Cimbalistienė1, Živilė Maldžienė1,2, Tautvydas Rančelis1,2, Evelina Marija Vaitėnienė1, Laima Ambrozaitytė1, Justas Dapkūnas3, Ramūnas Dzindzalieta2,4, Erinija Pranckevičienė1, Vaidutis Kučinskas1, Algirdas Utkus1,2, Eglė Preikšaitienė1.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: Christianson syndrome; SLC9A6; cDNA analysis; donor splice site variant; protein modelling
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35334527 PMCID: PMC8949093 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58030351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Figure 1(A)—the genealogy of the family presenting two affected brothers in the third generation and affected uncle in the second generation, as well as female carriers in the second and first generations. (B)—schematic representation of the primers designed to amplificate specific cDNA fragment of the SLC9A6 gene. (C)—Sanger sequencing of DNA samples confirms the SLC9A6 splice site variant c.899 + 1G > A in proband 1, proband 2, and their mother. (D)—schematic representation of cDNA Sanger sequencing results showing exon 6 skipping. (E)—SLC9A6 protein linear representation with predicted impact of exon 6 skipping on protein leading to frameshift and premature stop codon.
Figure 2Disorder predictions and structure model of SLC9A6 dimer. Low quality regions in the structural model (red) usually correspond to parts of the protein predicted to be disordered, and the structured core of the dimer is predicted with higher confidence (blue).
Figure 3Regions corresponding to the truncated mutant protein (dark colours) in the context of the structure model of the SCL9A6 dimer. Regions predicted as disordered are shown in ribbon representation, and the structured part of the protein is shown in cartoon.