Literature DB >> 28263393

VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas.

Kliment Olechnovič1,2, Česlovas Venclovas1.   

Abstract

In the absence of experimentally determined protein structure many biological questions can be addressed using computational structural models. However, the utility of protein structural models depends on their quality. Therefore, the estimation of the quality of predicted structures is an important problem. One of the approaches to this problem is the use of knowledge-based statistical potentials. Such methods typically rely on the statistics of distances and angles of residue-residue or atom-atom interactions collected from experimentally determined structures. Here, we present VoroMQA (Voronoi tessellation-based Model Quality Assessment), a new method for the estimation of protein structure quality. Our method combines the idea of statistical potentials with the use of interatomic contact areas instead of distances. Contact areas, derived using Voronoi tessellation of protein structure, are used to describe and seamlessly integrate both explicit interactions between protein atoms and implicit interactions of protein atoms with solvent. VoroMQA produces scores at atomic, residue, and global levels, all in the fixed range from 0 to 1. The method was tested on the CASP data and compared to several other single-model quality assessment methods. VoroMQA showed strong performance in the recognition of the native structure and in the structural model selection tests, thus demonstrating the efficacy of interatomic contact areas in estimating protein structure quality. The software implementation of VoroMQA is freely available as a standalone application and as a web server at http://bioinformatics.lt/software/voromqa. Proteins 2017; 85:1131-1145.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Voronoi tessellation of balls; additively weighted Voronoi diagram; estimation of model quality; knowledge-based statistical potential; protein structure modeling; protein structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28263393     DOI: 10.1002/prot.25278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  38 in total

1.  Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.

Authors:  Jürgen Haas; Alessandro Barbato; Dario Behringer; Gabriel Studer; Steven Roth; Martino Bertoni; Khaled Mostaguir; Rafal Gumienny; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-12-17

2.  Performance and enhancement of the LZerD protein assembly pipeline in CAPRI 38-46.

Authors:  Charles Christoffer; Genki Terashi; Woong-Hee Shin; Tunde Aderinwale; Sai Raghavendra Maddhuri Venkata Subramaniya; Lenna Peterson; Jacob Verburgt; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-11-25

3.  Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Genki Terashi; Charles W Christoffer; Mengmeng Zhu; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  VoroMQA web server for assessing three-dimensional structures of proteins and protein complexes.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Estimation of model accuracy in CASP13.

Authors:  Jianlin Cheng; Myong-Ho Choe; Arne Elofsson; Kun-Sop Han; Jie Hou; Ali H A Maghrabi; Liam J McGuffin; David Menéndez-Hurtado; Kliment Olechnovič; Torsten Schwede; Gabriel Studer; Karolis Uziela; Česlovas Venclovas; Björn Wallner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-07-16

6.  rsRNASP: A residue-separation-based statistical potential for RNA 3D structure evaluation.

Authors:  Ya-Lan Tan; Xunxun Wang; Ya-Zhou Shi; Wenbing Zhang; Zhi-Jie Tan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  The H-subunit of the restriction endonuclease CglI contains a prototype DEAD-Z1 helicase-like motor.

Authors:  Paulius Toliusis; Giedre Tamulaitiene; Rokas Grigaitis; Donata Tuminauskaite; Arunas Silanskas; Elena Manakova; Ceslovas Venclovas; Mark D Szczelkun; Virginijus Siksnys; Mindaugas Zaremba
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Two New Heuristic Methods for Protein Model Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Wenbo Wang; Junlin Wang; Dong Xu; Yi Shang
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Improved Protein Model Quality Assessment By Integrating Sequential And Pairwise Features Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Jing; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Protein Docking Model Evaluation by Graph Neural Networks.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Sean T Flannery; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.