Literature DB >> 28128854

Improved standard error estimator for maintaining the validity of inference in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.

Whitney P Ford1, Philip M Westgate1.   

Abstract

Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are studies in which clusters of subjects are randomized to different trial arms. Due to the nature of outcomes within the same cluster to be correlated, generalized estimating equations (GEE) are growing as a popular choice for the analysis of data arising from CRTs. In the past, research has shown that analyses using GEE could result in liberal inference due to the use of the empirical sandwich covariance matrix estimator, which can yield negatively biased standard error estimates when the number of clusters is not large. Many techniques have been presented to correct this negative bias; however, use of these corrections can still result in biased standard error estimates and thus test sizes that are not consistently at their nominal level. Therefore, there is a need for an improved correction such that nominal type I error rates will consistently result. In this manuscript, we study the use of recently developed corrections for empirical standard error estimation and the use of a combination of two popular corrections. In an extensive simulation study, we found that nominal type I error rates can be consistently attained when using an average of two popular corrections developed by Mancl and DeRouen (, Biometrics 57, 126-134) and Kauermann and Carroll (, Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 1387-1396). Therefore, use of this new correction was found to notably outperform the use of previously recommended corrections.
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster randomized trials; Empirical standard error; Generalized estimating equations; Group randomized trials; Test size

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28128854     DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201600182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  11 in total

1.  An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Fan Li; Elizabeth L Turner; Patrick J Heagerty; David M Murray; William M Vollmer; Elizabeth R DeLong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Xueqi Wang; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser; Fan Li
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 1.715

Review 3.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials in cancer: A review of current practices.

Authors:  David M Murray; Sherri L Pals; Stephanie M George; Andrey Kuzmichev; Gabriel Y Lai; Jocelyn A Lee; Ranell L Myles; Shakira M Nelson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.

Authors:  Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessment of triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) exposure to nail salon workers by air, hand wipe, and urine analysis.

Authors:  Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Alexander Mayer; Jonathan Slone; I-Chen Chen; Michael Zhou; Mark J La Guardia; Nayana Jayatilaka; Maria Ospina; Antonia Calafat
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.840

6.  xtgeebcv: A command for bias-corrected sandwich variance estimation for GEE analyses of cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  John A Gallis; Fan Li; Elizabeth L Turner
Journal:  Stata J       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Randomization-based inference for a marginal treatment effect in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Dustin J Rabideau; Rui Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Sample size estimation for modified Poisson analysis of cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.

Authors:  Fan Li; Guangyu Tong
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.494

9.  Sample size and power considerations for cluster randomized trials with count outcomes subject to right truncation.

Authors:  Fan Li; Guangyu Tong
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.715

10.  Performance of model-based vs. permutation tests in the HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM) Communities Study, a covariate-constrained cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Timothy Heeren; Philip M Westgate; Daniel J Feaster; Soledad A Fernandez; Nathan Vandergrift; Debbie M Cheng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.