| Literature DB >> 35322808 |
Hui Li1, Cuifang Fan2, Shanshan Yin3, Ijaz Ul Haq4, Sumaira Mubarik5, Ghulam Nabi6, Suliman Khan7, Linlin Hua8.
Abstract
The universal two-child policy (TCP; 2016) in China has affected many aspects of maternal-neonatal health. A tertiary hospital-based retrospective study (2011-2019) was used to find the association of these policy changes with maternal age and pregnancy outcomes in women with AMA (≥ 35 years) in the Hubei Province, China. The proportion of neonatal births to women with AMA increased by 68.8% from 12.5% in the one-child policy (OCP) period to 21.1% in the universal TCP period [aOR 1.76 (95% CI: 1.60, 1.93)]. In the univariate analysis, the proportion of preterm births (29.4% to 24.1%), low birth weight (LBW) (20.9% to 15.9%), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (11.5% to 9.2%) significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in women with AMA from the OCP period to universal TCP period. However, the proportion of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (0.2% to 0.7%) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (1.7% to 15.6%) was significantly (p < 0.05) increased over the policy changes. After adjusting for confounding factors, only the risk of GDM increased [aOR 10.91 (95% CI: 6.05, 19.67)] in women with AMA from the OCP period to the universal TCP period. In conclusion, the risk of GDM increased in women with AMA from the OCP period to the universal TCP period.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35322808 PMCID: PMC8943149 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08396-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Changes in maternal characteristics from OCP (One-child policy) period to universal TCP (Two-child policy) period. * = Frequency and percentage of variables with only ‘Yes’ value presented, AMA (advanced maternal age) HDP (Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy composite of Gestational hypertension (GH), Preeclampsia (PE) and severe PE), Abnormal placentation (Composite of placenta previa and placental abruption), GDM (Gestational diabetes mellitus), p-values were calculated using chi-square test.
| Maternal age Characteristics | OCP period (2011–2013) | Partial TCP period (2014–2016) | Universal TCP period (2017–2019) | Cramer's V | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 5653 | 100.00 | 8137 | 100.00 | 9261 | 100.00 | –- | –- |
| < 30 | 3232 | 57.1 | 4252 | 52.2 | 3836 | 41.4 | 0.09 | < 0.001 (trend ) |
| 30–34 | 1716 | 30.4 | 2584 | 31.8 | 3475 | 37.5 | ||
| ≥ 35 (AMA) | 705 | 12.5 | 1301 | 16.0 | 1950 | 21.1 | ||
| Low | 1432 | 25.3 | 1926 | 23.7 | 1584 | 17.2 | 0.07 | < 0.001 |
| Middle | 2241 | 39.6 | 3226 | 39.6 | 3607 | 38.9 | ||
| Higher | 1980 | 35.1 | 2985 | 36.7 | 4070 | 43.9 | ||
| Housewives | 3153 | 55.8 | 4328 | 53.2 | 4561 | 49.3 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
| Professional services | 2363 | 41.8 | 3624 | 44.5 | 4475 | 48.3 | ||
| Manual workers | 137 | 2.4 | 185 | 2.3 | 225 | 2.4 | ||
| Primiparous (≤ 1) | 4606 | 81.5 | 6181 | 76.0 | 6696 | 72.3 | 0.08 | < 0.001 |
| Multiparous (> 1) | 1047 | 18.5 | 1956 | 24.0 | 2565 | 27.7 | ||
| C-section* | 3276 | 58.0 | 5049 | 62.0 | 5681 | 61.3 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
| Previous history of C-section* | 366 | 6.5 | 1234 | 15.2 | 1993 | 21.5 | 0.16 | < 0.001 |
| HDP* | 313 | 5.5 | 458 | 5.6 | 725 | 7.8 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
| Abnormal placentation* | 187 | 3.3 | 348 | 4.3 | 480 | 5.2 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
| GDM* | 41 | 0.7 | 409 | 5.0 | 1088 | 11.7 | 0.17 | < 0.001 |
Association between maternal age and policy changes. OCP (One-child policy), TCP (Two-child policy), AMA (advanced maternal age), Adjusted for maternal education, occupation, and parity; * = P < 0.05.
| Maternal age (years) | OCP period (2011–2013) | Partial TCP period (2014–2016) | Universal TCP period (2017–2019) |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 30 | 1.00 (reference) | 0.86 (0.80, 0.92)* | 0.57 (0.53, 0.61)* |
| 30–34 | 1.00 (reference) | 1.04 (0.96, 1.12) | 1.31 (1.21, 1.41)* |
| ≥ 35 (AMA) | 1.00 (reference) | 1.27 (1.15, 1.40)* | 1.76 (1.60, 1.93)* |
Changes in neonatal characteristics from OCP (One-child policy) period to universal TCP (Two-child policy) period. * = Frequency and percentage of only ‘Yes’ value presented, LBW (Low birth weight), IUGR (Intrauterine growth restriction), LPI (Low ponderal index), congenital defects (microtia, anotia, polydactyly, heart defects, limb reduction defects, cleft lip, cleft palate, hydrocephaly, and NTDs), p-values were calculated using chi-square test.
| Neonatal characteristics | OCP period (2011–2013) | Partial TCP period (2014–2016) | Universal TCP period (2017–2019) | Cramer's V | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | |||||
| Total | 5653 | 100.00 | 8137 | 100.00 | 9261 | 100.00 | –- | –- | ||
| Preterm births* | 1084 | 19.2 | 1635 | 20.1 | 1693 | 18.3 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||
| Perinatal mortality* | 81 | 1.4 | 43 | 0.5 | 204 | 2.2 | 0.06 | < 0.001 | ||
| LBW* | 802 | 14.2 | 1248 | 15.3 | 1221 | 13.2 | 0.02 | < 0.001 | ||
| IUGR* | 19 | 0.3 | 31 | 0.4 | 118 | 1.3 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | ||
| LPI* | 216 | 3.8 | 325 | 4.0 | 354 | 3.8 | 0.01 | 0.8 | ||
| Low Apgar score* | 184 | 3.3 | 372 | 4.6 | 282 | 3.0 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | ||
| Fetal distress* | 240 | 4.2 | 60 | 0.7 | 221 | 2.4 | 0.09 | < 0.001 | ||
| Fetal macrosomia* | 306 | 5.2 | 466 | 5.7 | 480 | 5.2 | 0.01 | 0.2 | ||
| Congenital defects* | 79 | 1.4 | 124 | 1.5 | 95 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||
| Male | 3038 | 53.7 | 4385 | 53.9 | 4902 | 52.9 | 0.01 | 0.4 | ||
| Female | 2615 | 46.3 | 3752 | 46.1 | 4359 | 47.1 | ||||
Changes of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with AMA over the period of policy changes. OCP (One-child policy), TCP (Two-child policy), AMA (advanced maternal age), LBW (low birth weight), IUGR (intrauterine growth retardation), LPI (low ponderal index), HDP (hypertensive disorders of pregnancy), GDM (gestational diabetes mellitus).
| Adverse pregnancy outcomes | OCP period (2011–2013) (N = 705) | Partial TCP period (2014–2016) | Universal TCP period (2017–2019) (N = 1950) | Cramer's V | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preterm births | 207 | 29.4 | 336 | 25.8 | 470 | 24.1 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Perinatal mortality | 21 | 3.0 | 11 | 0.8 | 58 | 3.0 | 0.06 | < 0.001 |
| LBW | 147 | 20.9 | 240 | 18.4 | 310 | 15.9 | 0.04 | 0.008 |
| IUGR | 2 | 0.2 | 7 | 0.5 | 14 | 0.7 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| LPI | 33 | 4.7 | 58 | 4.5 | 75 | 3.8 | 0.01 | 0.5 |
| Low Apgar score | 34 | 4.8 | 77 | 5.9 | 71 | 3.6 | 0.04 | 0.009 |
| Fetal distress | 32 | 4.5 | 14 | 1.1 | 43 | 2.2 | 0.08 | < 0.001 |
| Macrosomia | 35 | 5.0 | 73 | 5.6 | 109 | 5.6 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| Congenital defects | 15 | 2.1 | 16 | 1.2 | 23 | 1.2 | 0.03 | 0.15 |
| HDP | 81 | 11.5 | 100 | 7.7 | 180 | 9.2 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Abnormal placentation | 44 | 6.2 | 93 | 7.1 | 122 | 6.3 | 0.01 | 0.5 |
| GDM | 12 | 1.7 | 113 | 8.7 | 305 | 15.6 | 0.17 | < 0.001 |
| C-section | 518 | 73.5 | 1004 | 77.2 | 1400 | 71.8 | 0.05 | 0.003 |
Association between adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with AMA and policy changes. OCP (One-child policy), TCP (Two-child policy), AMA (advanced maternal age), LBW (low birth weight), IUGR (intrauterine growth retardation), LPI (low ponderal index), HDP (hypertensive disorders of pregnancy), GDM (gestational diabetes mellitus), Adjusted for maternal education, occupation, pre-pregnancy body weight, parity, and neonatal gender; * = P < 0.05.
| Adverse pregnancy outcomes | OCP period aOR (95% CI) | Partial TCP period aOR (95% CI) | Universal TCP period aOR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preterm births | 1.00 (reference) | 0.89 (0.73, 1.10) | 0.88 (0.72, 1.08) |
| Perinatal mortality | 1.00 (reference) | 0.31 (0.14, 0.64) | 1.25 (0.73, 2.14) |
| LBW | 1.00 (reference) | 0.94 (0.75, 1.19) | 0.88 (0.70, 1.11) |
| IUGR | 1.00 (reference) | 4.46 (0.55, 36.08) | 5.99 (0.76, 47.08) |
| LPI | 1.00 (reference) | 0.95 (0.61, 1.49) | 0.82 (0.53, 1.27) |
| Low Apgar score | 1.00 (reference) | 1.33 (0.87, 2.01) | 0.87 (0.56, 1.34) |
| Fetal distress | 1.00 (reference) | 0.24 (0.12, 0.45)* | 0.52 (0.32, 0.85)* |
| Macrosomia | 1.00 (reference) | 1.11 (0.73, 1.69) | 1.14 (0.76, 1.71) |
| Congenital defects | 1.00 (reference) | 0.66 (0.32, 1.36) | 0.70 (0.35, 1.39) |
| HDP | 1.00 (reference) | 0.69 (0.50, 0.94)* | 0.85 (0.63, 1.14) |
| Abnormal placentation | 1.00 (reference) | 1.16 (0.80, 1.69) | 1.06 (0.73, 1.53) |
| GDM | 1.00 (reference) | 5.53 (3.02, 10.01)* | 10.91 (6.05, 19.67)* |
| C-section | 1.00 (reference) | 1.19 (0.96, 1.47) | 0.83 (0.68, 1.01) |
Figure 1Flow chart of study population.