Literature DB >> 23631865

The relationship between low birth weight and socioeconomic status in Ireland.

David Madden1.   

Abstract

There is now fairly substantial evidence of a socioeconomic gradient in low birth weight for developed countries. The standard summary statistic for this gradient is the concentration index. Using data from the recently published Growing Up in Ireland survey, this paper calculates this index for low birth weight arising from preterm and intrauterine growth retardation. It also carries out a decomposition of this index for the different sources of low birth weight and finds that income inequality appears to be less important for the case of preterm births, while father's education and local environmental conditions appear to be more relevant for intrauterine growth retardation. The application of the standard Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition also indicates that the socioeconomic gradient for low birth weight appears to arise owing to different characteristics between rich and poor, and not because the impact of any given characteristic on low birth weight differs between rich and poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23631865     DOI: 10.1017/S0021932013000187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosoc Sci        ISSN: 0021-9320


  10 in total

1.  Family socioeconomic position and abnormal birth weight: evidence from a Chinese birth cohort.

Authors:  Si Tu; Ao-Lin Wang; Mei-Zhen Tan; Jin-Hua Lu; Jian-Rong He; Song-Ying Shen; Dong-Mei Wei; Min-Shan Lu; Shiu Lun Au Yeung; Hui-Min Xia; Xiu Qiu
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.764

2.  Comparing the Relationship Between Stature and Later Life Health in Six Low and Middle Income Countries.

Authors:  Mark E McGovern
Journal:  J Econ Ageing       Date:  2014-12

3.  Explaining the Association Between Fetal Growth and Childhood ADHD Symptoms: Cross-cohort Replication.

Authors:  Niamh Dooley; Colm Healy; Ross Brannigan; David Cotter; Mary Clarke; Mary Cannon
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2022-09-17

4.  Socio-economic status and lifestyle factors are associated with achalasia risk: A population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Helen G Coleman; Ronan T Gray; Kar W Lau; Conall McCaughey; Peter V Coyle; Liam J Murray; Brian T Johnston
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  An Analysis of the Trend of Fetal Mortality Rates among Working and Jobless Households in Japan, 1995-2019.

Authors:  Tasuku Okui
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Evaluation of health in pregnancy grants in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment.

Authors:  Ruth Dundas; Samiratou Ouédraogo; Lyndal Bond; Andrew H Briggs; James Chalmers; Ron Gray; Rachael Wood; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Economic Inequality in Presenting Vision in Shahroud, Iran: Two Decomposition Methods.

Authors:  Asieh Mansouri; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Hojjat Zeraati; Hasan Hashemi; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-01-01

8.  Changes in Socioeconomic Inequality of Low Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Shaanxi Province of Northwest China, 2010-2013: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Leilei Pei; Yijun Kang; Yaling Zhao; Yue Cheng; Hong Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The effect of birth weight on body composition: Evidence from a birth cohort and a Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Junxi Liu; Shiu Lun Au Yeung; Baoting He; Man Ki Kwok; Gabriel Matthew Leung; C Mary Schooling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Changes in adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with advanced maternal age (AMA) after the enactment of China's universal two-child policy.

Authors:  Hui Li; Cuifang Fan; Shanshan Yin; Ijaz Ul Haq; Sumaira Mubarik; Ghulam Nabi; Suliman Khan; Linlin Hua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.