Literature DB >> 4907007

Comparative study of the efficacy of seven paper-reagent strips and conventional biochemical tests in identifying gram-negative organisms.

J M Matsen, J C Sherris.   

Abstract

Gram-nagative organisms were tested with commercially available reagentimpregnated strips (PATHO-TEC). Of the 291 strains, all were tested by using seven paper tests and their conventional counterparts. Excellent correlation was obtained with the oxidase, phenylalanine-deaminase, and Voges-Proskauer tests. Indole tests made on liquid medium cultures also gave complete correlation, but some false-negative results with indole-positive Proteus strains were obtained when growth from solid medium was tested by the strip method. Paper strip urease tests were positive within 2 hr with all Klebsiella and some Serratia, Herellea, and Citrobacter strains as well as with Proteus strains. Approximately 15% of citrate strip test results differed from those of the conventional tests, and reproducibility was poor on retest. The lysine decarboxylase strip test showed a number of discrepancies and posed problems of interpretation and readability. Paper reagent strip methods are simple and convenient and merit further development to increase the specificity of those which depend on pH change up to that achieved with the Voges-Proskauer, oxidase, phenylalanine, and indole methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1969        PMID: 4907007      PMCID: PMC378003          DOI: 10.1128/am.18.3.452-457.1969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0003-6919


  9 in total

1.  AN EVALUATION OF REAGENT-IMPREGNATED PAPER STRIPS FOR USE IN THE PROCESS OF IDENTIFYING CERTAIN SPECIES OF CLINICALLY IMPORTANT BACTERIA.

Authors:  A L GANDELMAN; P H MANN
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  1965-02

2.  Activity of lysine decarboxlase as an aid in the identification of Salmonellae and Shigellae.

Authors:  S FALKOW
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1958-06       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  The adaptive formation of urease by washed suspensions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  W E DETURK
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1955-08       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Urea Decomposition as a Means of Differentiating Proteus and Paracolon Cultures from Each Other and from Salmonella and Shigella Types.

Authors:  W B Christensen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1946-10       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Comparison of reagent-impregnated paper strips and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D K Weaver; E K Lee; M S Leahy
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Use of reagent-impregnated ("Patho-Tec") test papers in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and similar bacteria.

Authors:  K G Narayan; P A Guinée; D A Mossel
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Rapid presumptive identification of enterics with reagent impregnated paper strips.

Authors:  M Prevorsek; D P Kronish; B S Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1968-05

8.  Comparison of reagent-impregnated paper strips and conventional tests for distinguishing Escherichia from Aerobacter: correlation with colonial morphology.

Authors:  D Amsterdam; M W Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-10

9.  The urease activity of fluorescent pseudomonads.

Authors:  D J Stewart
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1965-11
  9 in total
  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of the pathotec Rapid I-D system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; D L Rhoden; K M Tomfohrde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Biographical feature: John Matsen, M.D.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of miniaturized multitest systems with conventional methodology for identification of Enterobacteriaceae from foods.

Authors:  L S Guthertz; R L Okoluk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparative study of three methods of identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  I Rutherford; V Moody; T L Gavan; L W Ayers; D L Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Microfermentation series for identification of single colonies of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  C N Huhtanen; J Naghski; E S Dellamonica
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-10

7.  Evaluation of the PathoTec "Rapid I-D System".

Authors:  D J Blazevic; P C Schreckenberger; J M Matsen
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-12

8.  Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  C E Nord; A A Lindberg; A Dahlbäck
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1974-03-22       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Evaluation of the enterotube system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  W J Martin; P K Yu; J A Washington
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-07

10.  Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; B B Gardner; S J Clark; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.