| Literature DB >> 35269898 |
Marija Ivanov1, Ana Ćirić1, Dejan Stojković1.
Abstract
Despite abundant research in the field of antifungal drug discovery, fungal infections remain a significant healthcare burden. There is an emerging need for the development of novel antifungals since those currently available are limited and do not completely provide safe and secure protection. Since the current knowledge regarding the physiology of fungal cells and the infection mechanisms is greater than ever, we have the opportunity to use this for the development of novel generations of antifungals. In this review, we selected and summarized recent studies describing agents employing different antifungal mechanisms. These mechanisms include interference with fungal resistance, including impact on the efflux pumps and heat shock protein 90. Additionally, interference with virulence factors, such as biofilms and hyphae; the impact on fungal enzymes, metabolism, mitochondria, and cell wall; and antifungal vaccines are explored. The agents investigated belong to different classes of natural or synthetic molecules with significant attention given also to plant extracts. The efficacy of these antifungals has been studied mainly in vitro with some in vivo, and clinical studies are needed. Nevertheless, there is a large quantity of products employing novel antifungal mechanisms that can be further explored for the development of new generation of antifungals.Entities:
Keywords: Aspregillus; Candida; antibiofilm; antifungal targets; drug discovery; fungal resistance; mechanism of action; mitochondrial activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35269898 PMCID: PMC8911111 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052756
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Chemical structures of nystatin and natamycin.
Figure 2Chemical structures of antifungal azoles for topical applications.
Figure 3Chemical structure of antifungal amines used for topical applications. (E)—trans isomer, (S)—sinister enantiomer, (R)—rectus enantiomer.
Figure 4Chemical structure of Amphotericin B.
Figure 5Chemical structure of azole derivatives used as systemic antifungal drugs. (S)—sinister enantiomer, (R)—rectus enantiomer.
Figure 6Chemical structure of Terbinafine.
Overview of some of the agents recently explored as antifungals targeting different structures/processes in fungal cells. (-)—not determined.
| Product | Target | Assay | Fungi | Active Concentration | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | Homoserine | Spectroscopic studies, and X-ray crystallography | 64–128 µg/mL | [ | |
| AF.KEX1 | Endoprotease | Mice in vivo study |
| 50 µg | [ |
| AMP-17 | Range of metabolic pathway | Proteomic analysis | 32 μg/mL | [ | |
| Antimicrobial peptide Ctn [15–34] | Biofilm, cell membrane | XTT and fluorescent dyes, CLSM, and atomic force microscopy; Fluorescence assays | 10 µM | [ | |
| Antimicrobial peptide VLL-28 | Damaging the cell wall/biofilm | XTT reduction assay, CV assay, CLSM | Range of Candida strains | 12.5 –25 µM | [ |
| Apigenin, Apigetrin, Luteolin, Quercetin, Quercitrin, Isoquercitrin, Rutin | Hyphal growth, biofilm, CDR1 | Microscopic examination, CV antibiofilm assay, qRT-PCR | 0.0375–0.075 mg/mL | [ | |
| ApoB-derived | Cell membrane, metabolic activity | Propidium iodide intake; cell proliferator reagent | 5–40 µM | [ | |
| Aqueous seed extract from | Capsule formation, size | Fluorescent microscopy | 281–1126 µg/mL | [ | |
| Biofilm, EPS, cell membrane | CV antibiofilm assay, Congo red assay, nucleotide leakage and CV uptake assays | 0.5 mg/mL | [ | ||
| Arylamidine T-2307 | Inhibition of respiratory chain complexes | Assessment of respiratory chain enzymatic activities, measurement of intracellular ATP levels | 220–344 µM | [ | |
| Astragalin | Hyphal growth, cell membrane integrity | Microscopic examination, nucleotide leakage assay | 0.075 mg/mL | [ | |
| Benzoxazole derivatives | Ergosterol, cell efflux | Ergosterol estimation assay using spectrophotometry and HPLC, Rhodamine 123 efflux | 0.125–160 µg/mL | [ | |
| Berberine | Mitochondrial function and Mdr1p | RNA-seq | 32 μg/mL | [ | |
| Biatriosporin D | Hyphal growth | Microscopy, qRT-PCR | 0.5–4.0 μg/ml | [ | |
| Blue light | Biofilm viability | Adherence inhibition, developmental inhibition, and disruption biofilm assays (CFU count LIVE/DEAD BacLight viability staining) | - | [ | |
| Camphor | Hyphal growth and biofilm | Microscopy, CV antibiofilm assay | 0.125 mg/mL and 23 mg/mL | [ | |
| Cannabidiol | EPS production | Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), qRT-PCR | 50 µg/mL | [ | |
| Mitochondrial function | Measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential, assay for mitochondrial enzyme activities | 5–25 µg/mL | [ | ||
| Catechol | Hyphal growth, biofilm, downregulation of RAS1, HWP1 and ALS3 | Microscopy, CV assay, RT-PCR | 2–256 μg/mL | [ | |
| Chiloscyphenol A | Mitochondrial function | Analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential, measurement of intracellular ATP production, observation of the localization of Tom70-GFP | Up to 64 μg/mL | [ | |
| Curcumin-sophorolipid nanocomplex | Biofilm and hyphae | CV assay, CLSM, qRT-PCR | 9.37 μg/mL | [ | |
| Dioscin | Hyphal growth, biofilm, production of phospholipase | Microscopy, XTT reduction assay, CLSM, Egg yolk phospholipase assay | 4 μg/mL | [ | |
| Eltrombopag | Capsule and biofilm formation, melanin production | ImageJ of stained cells, XTT reduction assay, L-DOPA melanization assay | 0.06 mg/l | [ | |
| Emodin | Hyphal growth and biofilm formation | Morphology on Spider medium, MTT assay | 12.50 μg/mL | [ | |
| Eucarobustol E | Hyphae, biofilm | Filmentation assay on hypaae inducing medium, XTT reduction assay, CLSM, SEM, RNA-seq, RT-PCR | 8.0–16.0 μg/mL | [ | |
| Heat-killed fbp1Δ cells | F-box protein Fbp1, ligase subunit | Mice in vivo study | 5 × 107 heat-killed fungal cells | [ | |
| Kalopanaxsaponin A | Mitochondrial function and cell membrane | Asessment of alteration of mtΔψ and ATP content, PI staining, TEM | 8–32 µg/mL | [ | |
| Magnoflorine | Alpha-glucosidase | Spectrophotometric alpha-glucosidase inhibition assay | 50 µg/mL | [ | |
| Mefloquine derivatives | Mitochondrial and vacuolar function | MitoTracker Red uptake | 1–64 μg/mL | [ | |
| Mohangamide A | Isocitrate lyase in glyoxylate pathway | High-Throughput Screening | 4.4 µM | [ | |
| Monoterpenoid perillyl alcohol | Glyoxylate cycle inhibitor | Isocitrate lyase enzyme assay | 320 µg/mL | [ | |
| Morin | Hyphal growth, biofilm formation, phospholipase and exopolysaccharide production | Microscopic analysis; CV antibiofilm assay; Egg yolk assay; Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis | 150 μg/ml | [ | |
| mvPC | Multivalent | In silico study | - | [ | |
| NCR Peptide Fragments | Biofilm, hyphae | XTT reduction assay; Microscopy | 0.78–12.5 µM | [ | |
| NDV-3A | Adhesins | In silico and in vivo mice studies | 300 μg | [ | |
| Biofilm, cell membrane | CV antibiofilm assay, nucleotide leakage assay | C. albicans | 10 mg/mL | [ | |
| Phenylhydrazones | Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase | Molecular dynamics, enzyme inhibition assay | 2.7–4.1 µM | [ | |
| Recombinant Sap2 | Secreted aspartyl protease | Mice in vivo study | 10 μg | [ | |
| Rosmarinic acid | Biofilm, EPS production, mitochondrial activity | CV antibiofilm assay, Congo red binding assay, MTT assay | 0.025–0.1 mg/mL | [ | |
| Shikonin | Hyphal growth, biofilm formation | Microscopy, XTT reduction assay, CLSM | 0.5–4 μg/mL | [ | |
| Sophorolipids | Biofilm and hyphae | XTT reduction assay, SEM and CLSM analysis, qRT-PCR | 15.0–30.0 μg/ml | [ | |
| Thiazolidinones | Carbonic anhydrase | Molecular docking and molecular dynamics, enzyme inhibition assay |
| 0.1–10 µM | [ |
| ToAP2D Peptide | Mitochondria | JC-1 kit |
| 4 mg/mL | [ |
| Usnic acid | EPS production | Spectrophotometrically, FT-IR analysis | 100 μg/ml | [ | |
| Ergosterol | Spectrophotometric quantification | 1–16 mg/L | [ | ||
| α-bisabolol | Ergosterol production | Spectrophotometry method | 0.28–9.0 mM | [ | |
| α-Cyperone | Capsule | Microscopic examination |
| 16 µg/mL | [ |