| Literature DB >> 33312106 |
Marija Ivanov1,2, Abhilash Kannan2, Dejan Stojkovic1, Jasmina Glamoclija1, Simona Golic Grdadolnik3, Dominique Sanglard2, Marina Sokovic1.
Abstract
Due to limited arsenal of systemically available antifungal agents, infections caused by Candida albicans are difficult to treat and the emergence of drug-resistant strains present a major challenge to the clinicians worldwide. Hence further exploration of potential novel and effective antifungal drugs is required. In this study we have explored the potential of a flavonoid, astragalin, in controlling the growth of C. albicans, in both planktonic and biofilm forms by microdilution method; and in regulating the morphological switch between yeast and hyphal growth. Astragalin ability to interfere with membrane integrity, ergosterol synthesis and its role in the regulation of genes encoding for efflux pumps has been addressed. In our study, astragalin treatment produced good antimicrobial and significant antibiofilm activity. Anticandidal activity of astragalin was not related to ERG11 downregulation, neither to direct binding to CYP51 enzyme nor was linked to membrane ergosterol assembly. Instead, astragalin treatment resulted in reduced expression of CDR1 and also affected cell membrane integrity without causing cytotoxic effect on human gingival fibroblast cells. Considering that astragalin-mediated decreased expression of efflux pumps increases the concentration of antifungal drug inside the fungal cells, a combinatorial treatment with this agent could be explored as a novel therapeutic option for candidiasis.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial; astragalin; ergosterol biosynthesis; hyphal transition; membrane integrity; mode of action
Year: 2020 PMID: 33312106 PMCID: PMC7726490 DOI: 10.17179/excli2020-2987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EXCLI J ISSN: 1611-2156 Impact factor: 4.068
Table 1Antimicrobial activity of compounds (results represent the MIC and MFC values in mg/mL)
Figure 1a) Inhibition of biofilm formation after treatment with astragalin and ketoconazole, expressed as inhibition percentage (100 % means no biofilm is established). b) Percentage of hyphal cells after 4 h treatment, control is C. albicans without any treatment. c) Nucleotide leakage detected by measuring the absorbance at wavelengths 260 nm and 280 nm after treatment of C. albicans cells with 1½ MIC of astragalin for 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. All values represent means ± SD of three replicates.
Table 2Minimal inhibitory concentrations (µg/mL) of astragalin and amphotericin B towards C. albicans in the absence and presence of ergosterol; dissociation constants (K) after titration of C. albicans CYP51 (CaCYP51) with tested compounds; cytotoxicity of astragalin towards human gingival fibroblasts (IC50 μg/mL). NT - not tested
Figure 2Expression levels of ERG11 (a) and CDR1 (b) after treatment with MIC of astragalin, ketoconazole and amphotericin B; fluphenazine was used as positive control for CDR1 expression. Values are expressed as Log2fold change (log2 FC) of RQ values and presented as an average of two biological replicates.