Farazul Haque1, Md Alfatah2, K Ganesan2, Mani Shankar Bhattacharyya1. 1. Biocatalysis and Fermentation Science Laboratory, Biochemical Engineering Research &Process Development Center (BERPDC), CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh-160 036, India. 2. Yeast Molecular Biology Laboratory, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh-160 036, India.
Abstract
Candida albicans causes superficial and life-threatening systemic infections. These are difficult to treat often due to drug resistance, particularly because C. albicans biofilms are inherently resistant to most antifungals. Sophorolipid (SL), a glycolipid biosurfactant, has been shown to have antimicrobial and anticancer properties. In this study, we investigated the effect of SL on C. albicans biofilm formation and preformed biofilms. SL was found to inhibit C. albicans biofilm formation as well as reduce the viability of preformed biofilms. Moreover, SL, when used along with amphotericin B (AmB) or fluconazole (FLZ), was found to act synergistically against biofilm formation and preformed biofilms. Effect of SL on C. albicans biofilm formation was further visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), which revealed absence of hyphae, typical biofilm architecture and alteration in the morphology of biofilm cells. We also found that SL downregulates the expression of hypha specific genes HWP1, ALS1, ALS3, ECE1 and SAP4, which possibly explains the inhibitory effect of SL on hyphae and biofilm formation.
Candida albicans causes superficial and life-threatening systemic infections. These are difficult to treat often due to drug resistance, particularly because C. albicans biofilms are inherently resistant to most antifungals. Sophorolipid (SL), a glycolipid biosurfactant, has been shown to have antimicrobial and anticancer properties. In this study, we investigated the effect of SL on C. albicans biofilm formation and preformed biofilms. SL was found to inhibit C. albicans biofilm formation as well as reduce the viability of preformed biofilms. Moreover, SL, when used along with amphotericin B (AmB) or fluconazole (FLZ), was found to act synergistically against biofilm formation and preformed biofilms. Effect of SL on C. albicans biofilm formation was further visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), which revealed absence of hyphae, typical biofilm architecture and alteration in the morphology of biofilm cells. We also found that SL downregulates the expression of hypha specific genes HWP1, ALS1, ALS3, ECE1 and SAP4, which possibly explains the inhibitory effect of SL on hyphae and biofilm formation.
Candidiasis caused by Candida species is one of the most common form of hospital
acquired opportunistic infection12. Though C. albicans remains
the major causative agent, infection caused by other Candida species like C.
tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. lusitaniae, C. parapsilosis and C.
krusei are becoming more prevalent1345. Immunocompromised
patients and patients with medically implanted devices (catheters, heart valves, cardiac
pacemakers, vascular bypass grafts, endotracheal tubes and central nervous system
shunts) are highly susceptible to Candida infections678.
Despite the use of antifungal therapies, due to delayed diagnosis and antifungal
resistance, candidiasis is associated with high mortality worldwide2910. An important reason for the failure of current antifungal drugs is attributed to
Candida biofilms which are inherently resistant to most antifungal
treatments. Biofilm is an organized community of cells, embedded in a matrix of
exopolymeric substances71112. Adherence and colonization of
planktonic cells on host tissues and medical devices initiates formation of
biofilms121314. The most notorious feature of biofilms is its
several fold higher resistance to antifungal drugs compared to their planktonic
counterparts81516. Moreover, few antifungal drugs which are
currently used in treatment, have other limitations such as severe toxicity171819. Thus, there is an urgent need for newer antifungal drugs that
are potentially active alone or in combination with current antifungals against both the
planktonic cells and biofilm of CandidaBiosurfactants show antiadhesive and antimicrobial activities202122.
Sophorolipid (SL) is a glycolipid biosurfactant, produced by several Starmerella
species232425. Naturally synthesized SL is a mixture of acidic
and lactonic forms and their abundance depends on the producer species26.
SL exhibits low cytotoxicity and its use in food and pharmaceutical industries have been
approved by US FDA27. Lactonic form of SL has antimicrobial and
anticancerous properties232528. Antifungal activity of SL against
planktonic cells of pathogenic Candida species has also been reported. However,
the activity of SL against Candida biofilms is not known. Recent reports showed
that combinatorial therapy of various drugs is highly effective to eradicate
Candida biofilm29. In fact, combinatorial therapy against
pathogens has several advantages which includes rapid effect of the therapy, wide drug
spectrum, synergy, lowered toxicity and lowered risk for antifungal resistance. In the
present study we investigated the effect of SL on Candida biofilm formation and
preformed biofilms of Candida, alone and in combination with AmB or FLZ. We have
also investigated the mechanistic basis for SL mediated biofilm inhibition, which is
possibly through inhibitory effect of SL on hyphae formation. Hyphae are the one of the
major constituents of biofilms.
Results
SL showed antifungal activity against both Candida albicans and
non-albicans Candida (NAC) strains
The MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) for SL was determined against C.
albicans and NAC in RPMI-1640 medium employing standard CLSI method30. Planktonic cells of C. albicans were incubated with
serially double-diluted concentrations of purified SL
(0–1920 μg/ml) in 96-well microtiter plates and
incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. At the end of incubation, growth
of cells was determined by OD600 nm reading. The
MIC80 is defined as the lowest concentration of SL which inhibits
80% cell growth as compared to control (without SL). MIC80 of C.
albicans was found to be 60 μg/ml (Table
1). Higher concentration led to the complete inhibition of growth.
In an attempt to find out the effect of SL on non-albicansCandida (NAC)
species, we extended our study to C. lusitaniae, C. tropicalis and C.
glabrata. The MIC80 for C. tropicalis and C.
glabrata was 60 μg/ml and 120 μg/ml,
respectively. C. lusitaniae was found to be the most susceptible (MIC80
30 μg/ml) among NAC strains tested (Table
1).
Table 1
List of Candida strains used in the SL susceptibility study and their
respective MIC80, BIC80 and BEC80
values.
Species and strain
MIC80 (μg/ml) of SL
BIC80 (μg/ml) of SL
BEC80 (μg/ml) of SL
C. albicans SC531418
60
120
480
C. glabrata CG46218
120
480
ND*
C. tropicalis MYA340450
60
120
480
C. lusitaniae CL618
30
120
ND*
*Not Determined.
SL inhibits biofilm formation and eradicates the preformed
biofilm
Activity of SL was tested on bioflm formation of C. albicans and NAC
strains. Biofilm formation was initiated in 96-well microtiter plates in the
presence of serially double diluted concentrations of SL
(0–1920 μg/ml) and incubated at 37 °C
for 2 days. Quantification of biofilms was performed by colorimetric XTT
reduction assay and viability was expressed in terms of percentage metabolic
activity. The BIC80 (biofilm inhibiting concentration) was defined as
the lowest concentration of SL that inhibits 80% metabolic activity of biofilm
formation as compared to control (without SL). We found that C. glabrata
has highest BIC80 (480 μg/ml) (Table
1, Supplementary Fig.
S1), whereas, BIC80 for C. albicans, C. tropicalis and
C. lusitaniae was 120 μg/ml (Table
1; Supplementary Fig.
S1).To know the antifungal efficacy of SL against C. albicans and NAC strain
mature biofilms, we performed SL susceptibility testing against preformed
biofilms. Biofilms were formed in 96-well microtiter plates for 2 days at
37 °C and thereafter, serially double-diluted concentrations of
SL (0–1920 μg/ml) were added to preformed biofilms and
further incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. Subsequently, metabolic
activity was determined by colorimetric XTT reduction assay. The
BEC80 (biofilm-eradicating concentration) was defined as the
lowest concentration of SL that eradicates 80% of biofilm compared to conrol (SL
untreated biofilms). The BEC80 for C. albicans was 4-fold
higher (480 μg/ml) compared to biofilm forming planktonic cells
(BIC80 120 μg/ml) (Table
1). Viability of preformed biofilms was found to be inhibited by SL
in a concentration dependent manner (Fig. 1B). For C.
tropicalis BEC80 was 480 μg/ml whereas,
C.glabrata was found to be highly resistant to SL, followed by C.
lusitaniae where BEC80 was not determined in both cases
(Table 1; Supplementary Fig. S2).
Figure 1
Effect of sophorolipid on C. albicans biofilm formation (A) and
preformed biofilms (B).
Readings of colorimetric XTT reduction assay at 492 nm are expressed
in terms of % metabolic activity of control. BIC80 and
BEC80 of SL against biofilm formation and preformed biofilms,
respectively, are defined as the minimum concentration of SL at which 80%
reduction in the metabolic activity of biofilm is seen as compared to the
control. Results represent the average of three independent
experiments ± SD.
*p < 0.05 when compared with the SL
untreated controls.
SL affectcs biofilm cells morphology
We further explored the effect of SL on C. albicans biofilm and their
cellular morphology. Biofilms were formed in presence of serially double-diluted
concentrations of SL (0–1920 μg/ml) on poly-L-lysine
coated glass cover slips in 6-well microtiter plates for 2 days at
37 °C, and visualised by SEM and CLSM. SEM images of control
sample (0 μg/ml SL) demonstrated the presence of complex
structure of biofilm having hyphae and yeast cells (Fig.
2A). Biofilms formed in the presence of 60 μg/ml SL
was devoid of hyphal organization and consisted mostly of yeast cells (Fig. 2B). It is worth noting that at this concentration
biofilm formation was reduced only by 60% (Fig. 1A),
indicating that SL inhibits hyphal growth even at a lower concentration. At
BIC80 concentration of SL (120 μg/ml) (Fig. 1A), biofilm cells were found to have perforated outer
membrane with swollen and deformed morphology (Fig. 2C).
Aggregated population of cells with wrinkled surface can be seen at
240 μg/ml and 480 μg/ml SL concentration
respectively (Fig. 2D,E). CLSM image (Fig.
3) showed dense and compact hyphal mass in the control sample
(0 μg/ml SL). However, at 60 μg/ml SL
concentration yeast cells were more prevalent. Further increase in SL
concentration (120 μg/ml) led to the complete inhibition of
biofilm and cells remains in the yeast form.
Figure 2
Scanning electron microscopy images of C. albicans biofilms.
Effect of sophorolipid on C. albicans biofilm formation was analyzed
by SEM at indicated magnifications. Biofilms were formed on coated
poly-L-lysine glass cover slips in 6-well cell culture plates at
37 °C for 2 days in the presence of 0 μg/ml
(A), 60 μg/ml (B),
120 μg/ml (C), 240 μg/ml (D)
and 480 μg/ml (E) of SL.
Figure 3
Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of C. albicans
biofilms.
Biofilms were formed at the indicated concentrations of sophorolipid on
coated poly-L-lysine glass cover slips in 6-well cell culture plates at
37 °C for 2 days. Biofilms were stained with SYTO 9 (green
fluorescence) and visualized at 60X magnification (upper panel). DIC of
respective images is shown in the lower panel.
SL inhibits Candida albicans hyphal growth
We further examined the effect of SL on hyphal growth. C. albicans hyphal
growth assay was performed in presence of different concentration of SL in
RPMI-1640 medium and RPMI-1640 medium containing hypha inducer (10% FBS) at
37 °C. After 5 hrs of incubation aliquots of the cells
were microscopically visualized. In control samples (0 μg/ml SL)
massive C. albicans hyphae were observed (Fig. 4,
Supplementary Fig. S3), however
hyphal growth was modest at 15 μg/ml SL, while, hyphal growth
was absent at 30 μg/ml SL in both media (Fig.
4), indicating concentration dependent inhibition of hyphal growth by
SL. Nevertheless, at this concentration of SL (15 μg/ml), growth
of hyphae in RPMI-1640 + 10% FBS medium was slightly higher
compared to RPMI-1640 medium (Fig. 4), which could be due
the effect of hypha inducing supplement (10% FBS). Effect of SL was also
examined on mature hyphae of C. albicans. The cells were first grown in
RPMI 1640 + 10% FBS for 5 hrs at 37 °C
and then treated with SL. Untreated sample (0 μg/ml SL) was
found to have massive hyphae (Fig. 5). However upon SL
(15 μg/ml) treatment, hyphae were shortend as compared to
untreated hyphae. Moreover at 30 μg/ml SL concentration cells
were completley devoid of hyphae and remains in yeast form.
Figure 4
Effect of sophorolipid on C. albicans hyphal growth.
C. albicans cells were grown in RPMI-1640 medium (upper panel) and
RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS (lower panel) at the indicated concentration of
SL at 37 °C for 5 hrs. At the end of incubation an
aliquot was withdrawn from each sample and photographed at 100×
magnification.
Figure 5
Effect of sophorolipid on C. albicans mature hyphae.
C. albicans cells were grown in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS for
5 hrs. After that mature hypha were treated with indicated
concentrations of SL for time point zero (upper panel) and 5 hrs
(lower panel) at 37 °C. At the end of incubation an aliquot
was withdrawn from each sample and photographed at 60×
magnification.
SL downregulates Candida albicans hyphal specific genes
To gain further insight into the mechanism of SL mediated inhibition of C.
albicanshyphal growth, we analyzed the expression profile of important
hyphal growth associated genes such as HWP1, ALS1, ALS3,
ECE1 and SAP41231. Hwp1 (hyphal wall protein
1), Als1 (agglutinin-like sequence 1) and Als3 (agglutinin-like sequence 3)
proteins are involved in the maintaining of cell wall integrity and hypha
initiation1231. Ece1 (extent of cell elongation 1) protein
is essential for hypha initiation and elongation1231.
SAP4 encodes secreted aspartyl protease 4 protein and its expression
is enhanced during yeast to hyphal cells transition3132. To
test whether SL reduces the expression of these genes resulting in hyphal growth
inhibition, we extracted total RNA from cells treated with SL
(15 μg/ml) and control (0 μg/ml SL) in RPMI-1640
medium. Transcript levels in SL treated and untreated cells were quantified by
qRT-PCR. Expression level of each gene was normalized with housekeeping gene
(ACT1) for both SL treated as well as untreated cells and presented
in the form of relative expression fold change. Expression of HWP1,
ALS1, ALS3, ECE1 and SAP4 in SL treated cells
was reduced significantly by 10-fold, 2.5-fold, 8.7-fold, 37.7-fold and 3.6-fold
respectively as compared to control (Fig. 6).
Figure 6
Effect of sophorolipid on the expression of C. albicans hypha specific
genes.
C. albicans cells were incubated in the absence (control) or presence
(15 μg/ml) of SL in RPMI-1640 medium at
37 °C for 5 hrs. Following incubation expression of
the indicated genes were determined by qRT-PCR. Expression level of each
gene is displayed after normalization with internal control housekeeping
gene ACT1. The histogram shows the relative expression fold change of
genes by SL treatment with respect to the control. Results represent the
average of three independent experiments ± SD.
*p < 0.05 when compared with the SL
untreated controls.
SL synergistically interacts with AmB and FLZ on Candida albicans
biofilm formation and preformed biofilms
Interaction of SL with two potent antifungal drugs AmB and FLZ was tested by
chequerboard assay on C. albicans biofilm formation and preformed
biofilms. The predetermined BIC80 of SL, AmB and FLZ were
120 μg/ml, 0.25 μg/ml and
256 μg/ml, respectively. The predetermined BEC80 of
SL and AmB were 480 μg/ml and 4 μg/ml,
respectively. However, BEC80 of FLZ was not achieved at the highest
concentration (1024 μg/ml) used in this study. Fractional
inhibitory concentration (FIC) of each compound in each combination (SL and AmB
or SL and FLZ) was calculated for biofilm formation and preformed biofilms. SL
at 0.125× BIC80 and 0.250× BIC80
concentrations reduced the BIC80 of AmB by 4-fold and of FLZ by
32-fold, respectively (Table 2). Moreover, SL at
0.250× BEC80 concentration reduced the BEC80 of
AmB and FLZ by 8-fold and more than 8-fold, respectively (Table
2). After FIC determination, Fractional inhibitory concentration
index (FICI) was calculated for each combination to determine the interaction of
SL with AmB or FLZ. The FICI of SL in combination of AmB and FLZ were 0.375 and
0.281, respectively, on biofilm formation, and 0.375 and ≤0.375,
respectively, on preformed biofilms (Table 2). These
values are ≤0.5, which indicate that SL has synergistic interaction with
AmB and FLZ on both biofilm formation and preformed biofilms.
Table 2
Interaction of sophorolipid with amphotericin B and fluconazole on C.
albicans biofilm formation and preformed biofilms.
Compound
Biofilm formation
Preformed biofilms
FICa
FICI
FIC
FICI
AmBSL
0.2500.125
0.375
0.1250.250
0.375
FLZSL
0.0310.250
0.281
<0.125*0.250
≥0.250 to≤0.375*
aFIC was calculated for the concentration at
which 80% (BIC80 or BEC80) reduction
in the metabolic activity of biofilm compared to the
control.
*BEC80 of preformed biofilm for FLZ
was ≥1024 μg/ml.
Discussion
SL is known to have antifungal activity, however, only percent inhibition with a
single concentration of SL have been reported. In the present study, we have
determined the MIC80 of SL against the planktonic cell of C. albicans,
C. tropicalis, C. glabrata and C. lusitaniae (Table
1). Previously, numerous studies have shown that biosurfactants inhibit
biofilm formation by preventing adhesion of microorganism to the solid surfaces20223334. Being biosurfactant in nature and having antifungal
property, we investigated the effect of SL on C. albicans biofilm formation.
BEC80 of SL was found different in different species. For C.
albicans and C. tropicalis the BEC80 was found to be 4-
fold higher in concentration as compared to the MIC80, indicating that
matured biofilm is moderately resistant towards SL as compared to planktonic cells.
During the course of our studies, Mukherji et al.35 reported
the antibiofilm activity of SL against Vibrio cholera, indicating that the
biofilm inhibitory activity of SL is likely to be broad spectrum. Since C.
albicans is the major disease causative agent, we further pursued our study
on C. albicans.SEM and CLSM analysis of the C. albicans biofilm demonstrated the presence of
dense hyphae in absence of SL. However, the SEM images at BIC80
(120 μg/ml, Fig. 2C) showed deformed and
swollen cells with perforated outer membrane. These morphological alterations of the
cells could be associated with loss of cell membrane integrity resulting in cell
death as reported previously for tetracycline-SL or cefaclor-SL combination
treatment against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli,
respectively27. Moreover, deformation of the cells and loss of
cell membrane integrity have been reported as the mechanisms of antimicrobial
activity for many biosurfactants36. Basak et al. reported that
SL capped ZnO nanoparticle mediated C. albicans cell death occurs via
membrane bursting followed by oozing out of proteins and intracellular
materials37. The same phenomena thought to be responsible for SL
mediated cell death. Aggregated scant population of biofilm cells with wrinkled
surface can be observed at 240 μg/ml and 480 μg/ml
of SL concentrations respectively (Fig. 2D,E), indicating
complete absence of biofilm formation.Since hyphal growth is a virulence factor in C. albicans infection31, inhibition of hyphal growth by SL (Figs 2B
and 3) is a significant finding. Besides their role in biofilm
formation, hyphae mediate dissemination of C. albicans to the host tissues by
invasion31. It has been reported that virulence of C.
albicans is reduced in hypha deficient mutants38, emphasizing
the importance of hypha formation in C. albicansinfection. The inhibition of
hyphal growth at 30 μg/ml concentration of SL, even in the presence
of hypha inducing agents (10% FBS) indicated significant role of SL in hyphal growth
inhibition.The effect of subinhibitory concentration of SL on mature hyphae of C. albicans cells
were also tested. Hyphae in presence of 15 μg/ml were shortened and
completely absent at 30 μg/ml concentration of SL used. There was no traces
of broken hypha found in both concentrations (Fig. 5). Another
reason for shortening of the hypahe may be due to the morphological plasticity as C.
albicans have a capability to undergo reversible morphological changes between
yeast, pseudohyphae and hyphal forms in response to environmental stress41. Similar results for reverse morphogenesis was observed with
gymnemic acid a triterpinoidsaponin family compound which, transforms the hyphal
cells into yeast form42.To gain insight into the molecular mechanism of SL mediated hyphal growth inhibition,
expression profile of hyphal growth associated genes were analyzed. Transcripts
result reveal that SL downregulates the expression of hyphal genes resulting in
inhibition of hyphal growth. It was earlier reported that C. albicans mutants
of HWP1 and ALS3 are defective in biofilm formation3940. Inhibition of expression of these genes by SL (15 μg/ml)
(Fig. 6) is consistent with its effect on biofilm
formation. At this concentration of SL, metabolic activity of biofilm formation was
around 55% as compared to the control (Fig. 1). Transcripts
level of HWP1 and ALS3 in cells treated with higher concentration of
SL was also quantified and found to be further reduced (data not shown). SL mediated
down-regulation of the expression of these genes and inhibition of hyphal growth
could be a reason for abrogation of C. albicans biofilm formation.C. albicans biofilms are intrinsically resistant to most of the current
antifungal drugs19. High dose antifungal drug therapy against
biofilms is always associated with severe side effects171819.
Echinocandins have shown some effectiveness against biofilms434445, but recent studies reported that resistance against it is emerging4647. Combination therapy is an option to minimize the side effect of
existing potent antifungals with the use of less or non-toxic new antifungals to
eradicate the Candida biofilm and thereby candidiasis infection48. Uppuluri and coworkers demonstrated that calcineurin inhibitors
FK506 and cyclosporine A in combination with FLZ can work in synergy against C.
albicans biofilm49. Here, we found that, SL inhibits hyphal
growth and biofilm formation, reduces the viability of preformed biofilms, and
synergistically interacts with antifungal drugs AmB and FLZ in biofilm conditions.
Therefore, it could be a potential compound against Candida biofilm as well
as can be used in combination with AmB and FLZ. To the best of our knowledge, this
is the first study demonstrating the role of SL in inhibition of C. albicans
biofilm formation and hyphal growth. Further evaluation is required to determine the
antibiofilm activity of SL in vivo. SL also enhances the efficacy of AmB and
FLZ against C. albicans biofilm, implying a promising synergistic combination
for the treatment of candidiasis.
Methods
Organisms, media and growth conditions
Wild type strains of C. albicans SC531418, C.
glabrata CG46218, C. tropicalis MYA340450 and C. lusitaniae CL618, were used in this
study. Frozen glycerol stock of the strain was regularly revived on YPD agar
medium (1% Bacto yeast extract, 2% Bacto peptone, 2% glucose and 2% Bacto agar).
For broth culture, strain was grown in YPD medium at 30 °C with
agitation (200 rpm). RPMI-1640 medium with L-glutamine without sodium
bicarbonate (Sigma) was buffered with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic
acid (Sigma) to a pH of 7. Stock solutions of extracted SL (supplementary material), AmB (Sigma) and FLZ
(Sigma) were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma), and stored at
−20 °C until use.
Purification and characterization of SL
Starmerella bombicola MTCC1910, was used for SL production. It was grown
as described in the supplement. SL was separated from the fermentation broth by
ethyl acetate extraction and concentrated by vacuum evaporation of the solvent
at 40 °C. Residual hydrophobic components were washed with
n-hexanes to obtain a crude mixture of SL. Different components of the crude
mixture were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) (Supplementary Fig. 4) on Merck silica Gel 60
F254 10 cm × 5 cm TLC
plates using chloroform /methanol (65:15:2) as mobile phase. Crude mixture of SL
was also characterized by HPLC (Shimadzu) with UV detector (207 nm) and
a RP-C18 column (Merck, 5 μ,
4.5 × 250 mm) using gradient elution. Initially,
acetonitrile:water (30:70) was used for 5 min, increased to
acetonitrile: water (80:20) in 25 min and maintained there for next
25 min. The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min and injection volume was
10 μl. Column chromatography was carried out to isolate the
lactonic form of SL. 50 gm of silica mesh size (60–120) in
hexane was packed in (50 × 5 cm) glass column.
200 ml of eluent (chloroform/ methanol) is run through the column before
loading the crude SL. 300–400 mg of crude SL dissolved in a
small volume of ethanol was mixed with silica (3.5 gm) and evaporated
under reduced pressure at 40 °C. Once the silica is fully dried
it was loaded into the column. Diacetylaed form of lactonic SL was eluted from
the column by using chloroform and methanol at a ratio of 98:2 and dried under
vacuum at 40 °C and stored for further use. HPLC analysis showed
a single peak of SL with more than 99% purity (Supplementary Fig. 5B). Different functional
groups present in the sample were identified by FT-IR spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 6) (Bruker optics,
vortex 70) confirming the presence of lactonic form of SL in the sample. This
preparation of SL was used for determining the anticandida activity in
subsequent experiments51.
SL susceptibility testing
SL activity against planktonic cells of Candida strains was tested by
broth microdilution method using CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards
Institute) guidelines30. Serially double-diluted concentrations
of SL were prepared in RPMI-1640 medium, such that the final concentration of
DMSO does not exceed 5% in any assay. 100 μl of each dilution
was dispensed into the well of a presterilized, flat-bottomed 96-well
polystyrene microtiter plate (Becton Dickinson). RPMI-1640 medium containing 5%
DMSO was included in control wells. Planktonic cells grown to exponential phase
in YPD broth was harvested, washed with sterile 1X phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) and resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium at a density of
4 × 103 cells/ml.
100 μl of cell suspension was added into the SL containing and
control wells to provide 2 × 103 cells/ml
in 200 μl working volume. Thereafter, microtiter plates were
incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. After incubation, growth of cells
was measured by microtiter plate reader (BioTek) at 600 nm.
Effect of SL on Candidas biofilm formation and preformed
biofilms
The biofilm formation assay was performed in 96-well microtiter plates as
described previously5253, with slight modifications. Briefly,
the cell suspension was prepared in RPMI-1640 medium at a density of
2 × 106 cells/ml and dispensed into
the wells of microtiter plates (100 μl per well). Serially
double-diluted concentrations of SL in RPMI-1640 medium were added
(100 μl per well) to the wells such that final cell density
remains 1 × 106 cells/ml for biofilm
formation53. Similarly, 100 μl of RPMI-1640
medium containing 5% DMSO without SL was added into the selected wells for
control. Microtiter plates were incubated at 37 °C for 2
days.For preformed biofilms, the cell suspension was prepared in RPMI-1640 medium at a
cell density of 1 × 106 cells/ml5253. 100 μl of cell suspension was dispensed
into the wells of microtiter plates and incubated at 37 °C for 2
days. At the end of incubation medium was aspirated from the wells and
nonadherent cells were removed by washing the biofilms 3-times with sterile PBS.
Residual PBS of the wells was removed by blotting with paper towels at the end
of washing steps. 100 μl of serially double-diluted
concentrations of SL were added into the wells of prewashed biofilms. For
control, 100 μl of RPMI-1640 medium containing final 5% DMSO
without SL was added into the selected wells of biofilms. Further, microtiter
plates were incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. The metabolic
activity of biofilms was quantitatively determined by colorimetric XTT
[2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium- 5-carboxanilide sodium
salt] reduction assay.
Colorimetric XTT reduction assay
Subsequent to the appropriate incubation of the microtiter plates, medium was
aspirated from the wells and nonadherent cells were removed by washing the
biofilms as described above. Colorimetric XTT reduction assay of biofilm was
performed as previously reported5253. 0.5 gm/L stock
solution of XTT tetrazolium salt (Sigma) in PBS was filter sterilized through
0.22 μm pore size filter and stored in aliquots at
−80 °C. Just prior assay, an aliquot was thawed and
1 μM final concentration of freshly prepared menadione (Sigma)
was added to the XTT solution. Hundred (100) μl of XTT-menadione
solution was distributed into the wells containing prewashed biofilms and to the
empty wells (for the background values of XTT reduction) and incubated at
37 °C in the dark for 1 hr. Colorimetric change in the
XTT reduction (reduced formazan-coloured product formation which is correlated
with the metabolic activity of the biofilm) was measured in a microtiter plate
reader at 492 nm.
SEM and CLSM analysis of Candida albicans biofilm
The effect of SL on biofilms was qualitatively analyzed by SEM and CLSM. Biofilms
were formed on poly-L-lysine (Sigma) coated glass cover slips (Blue Star) in
6-well cell culture plates (Nunc). Glass cover slips were coated with
poly-L-lysine (2% wt/vol) as described by Dong et al.54.
Coated cover slips were further sterilized by UV radiation for 1 hr
under laminar air flow and placed into the wells of microtiter plates for the
initiation of biofilms. Biofilms were formed in the presence of serially
double-diluted concentrations of SL at 37 °C for 2 days.
RPMI-1640 medium containing 5% DMSO without SL was included as control. At the
end of incubation cover slips were transferred to new 6-well plates and washed
3-times with PBS.For SEM, biofilms were dried and processed as described by Ramage et
al.55, with slight modifications. Briefly, PBS washed
biofilms were fixed subsequently for 20 min by formaldehyde (4% vol/vol)
and glutraldehyde (2% vol/vol), followed by dehydration in a series of ethanol
solutions55. Final dehydration was carried out by t-butyl
alcohol for 30 min at room temperature and then dried in a desiccator.
Thereafter, samples were coated with gold palladium for 135 sec at
10–12 milli amperes current and visualized by scanning electron
microscope (ZEISS EVO 40) in high-vacuum mode at 20 kV.For CLSM, biofilms were stained as described previously56 with
fluorescent stains SYTO 9 (Molecular Probes) which stain live cells. Coverslips
containing biofilms were incubated with 6.6 μM final
concentration SYTO 9 for 30 min in dark. Following incubation slides
were visualized with the Nikon A1R confocal microscope using 60X objective lens.
Images were analyzed with NIS Elements software.
Effect of SL on Candida albicans hyphal growth
Hyphal growth assay was performed in 10 ml of RPMI-1640 medium and
RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen).
Cell suspension was diluted at 1 × 107
cells/ml in medium and incubated with different concentrations of SL
(0 μg/ml, 15 μg/ml and 30 μg/ml)
at 37 °C with agitation (200 rpm) for 5 hrs.
Aliquots of samples were visualized under bright field using 100X objective lens
by Zeiss fluorescence microscope and photographed. Samples incubated in
different concentrations of SL for zero hour were also examined under similar
condition.
Effect of SL on Candida albicans mature hypha
Effect of SL on C. albicans hyphae was studied by growing the cells in
RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen). Different
concentrations of SL (0 μg/ml, 15 μg/ml and
30 μg/ml) was added to mature hyphae and incubated for
5 hrs at 37 °C. Subsequently, aliquots of samples were
visualized under bright field using 60X objective lens by Zeiss fluorescence
microscope and photographed. Samples at time point zero were also examined under
similar condition.
Expression analysis of Candida albicans hypha specific genes by
qRT-PCR
Effect of sub inhibitory concentration of SL on the expression of hypha specific
genes HWP1, ALS1, ALS3, ECE1 and SAP4 was
evaluated by two-step quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction
(qRT-PCR). Total RNA of the cells was extracted from SL treated
(15 μg/ml) and untreated (0 μg/ml) hyphal growth
samples of RPMI-1640 medium using hot phenol/chloroform extraction method57. Following extraction, RNA integrity was assessed on denaturing
agarose gel. Thereafter, total RNA was treated with DNase I, amplification grade
(Invitogen). cDNA was synthesized from DNase I treated total RNA using
iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (BIO-RAD) as per manufacturer’s
instructions. Primers for target (HWP1, ALS1, ALS3,
ECE1 and SAP4) and housekeeping internal control (ACT1)
genes were designed using Gene Runner software (Table 3)
and synthesized from Sigma. cDNA template (100 ng), gene specific sense
and antisense primers (200 nM) and iQ™
SYBR® Green Supermix (BIO-RAD) were used in reaction
mixture in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions and qRT-PCR was
performed in Mastercycler® ep realplex Real-time PCR system. To
check the DNA contamination in templates, DNase I treated total RNA were
included in each run. The following parameters were used for qRT-PCR: an initial
denaturation at 95 °C (3 min), followed by 40 cycles of
denaturation (95 °C/1 min), annealing
(58 °C/30 sec), and extension
(72 °C/20 sec), melting-curve analysis starting from
initial temperature 50 °C to 95 °C, with gradual
increase in 0.5 °C/15 second. Specificity of the primers
was confirmed by melting curve analysis. The generated CT values of
target genes were normalized to the CT value of housekeeping
ACT1 gene. Relative expression fold changes were evaluated by
ΔΔCT method using
2−ΔΔCT formula58.
Table 3
List of primers used for qRT-PCR experiments.
Primer
Sequence (5′-3′)
Tm(oC)
Amplified product size (bp)
CaACT1-RTS
GGTTTGGAAGCTGCTGGTATTGACC
60.8
135
CaACT1-RTAS
ACGTTCAGCAATACCTGGGAACATG
60.0
CaHWP1-RTS
CAAGTGGTGCTATTACTATTCCG
60.2
121
CaHWP1-RTAS
GCGACACTTGAGTAATTGGC
61.0
CaALS1-RTS
AGCTGTTGCCAGTGCTTC
60.6
132
CaALS1-RTAS
AATGTGTTGGTTGAAGGTGAG
60.2
CaALS3-RTS
CAACATCAACCAACCAATCTC
60.6
133
CaALS3-RTAS
TGAATAACAGAACCAGATCCG
60.3
CaECE1-RTS
CTTCTTCAAAGACTCCCACAAC
60.5
138
CaECE1-RTAS
TTCAATACCGACAGTTTCAATG
60.2
CaSAP4-RTS
GGTACCGTTGATTTCCAATTC
60.8
132
CaSAP4-RTAS
ATCTTCACTTTCACGAACACG
60.5
Combination testing of SL with AmB and FLZ on Candida albicans
biofilm formation and preformed biofilm
Nature of the interaction of SL with AmB and FLZ was evaluated by chequerboard
assay. Serially double-diluted concentrations of SL
(0–1920 μg/ml), AmB (0–32 μg/ml)
and FLZ (0–1024 μg/ml) were prepared in RPMI-1640
medium. 50 μl of each dilution of two compounds (SL and AmB or
SL and FLZ) were dispensed in 96-well microtiter plates. Biofilm formation was
initiated in the presence of combination of compounds and incubated at
37 °C for 2 days as described above. For preformed biofilms,
combination of compounds were added into the wells of PBS washed biofilms and
further incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. Following incubation,
medium was aspirated from the wells and biofilms were washed 3-times with PBS.
Thereafter, metabolic activity of biofilms was determined by colorimetric XTT
reduction assay. To evaluate the interaction between compounds, Fractional
Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI) was calculated from the data obtained with
biological triplicates. FICI is the sum of the FICs of either compound (BIC or
BEC compound A with compound B/BIC or BEC compound
A + BIC or BEC compound B with compound A/BIC
or BEC compound B). The interaction is considered synergistic when
the FICI is ≤0.5, indifferent when the value is
0.5 < FICI ≤4 and antagonistic when the value is
>429.
Statistical evaluation
All experiments were performed in triplicate and on three different days. All
data were expressed as mean values with the corresponding standard deviations
(SD). Statistical significance between treated and control groups was analyzed
by Student’s t-test (two-tailed, unequal variance). A p-value of
<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Haque, F. et al. Inhibitory Effect of
Sophorolipid on Candida albicans Biofilm Formation and Hyphal Growth. Sci.
Rep. 6, 23575; doi: 10.1038/srep23575 (2016).
Authors: Jonathan S Finkel; Wenjie Xu; David Huang; Elizabeth M Hill; Jigar V Desai; Carol A Woolford; Jeniel E Nett; Heather Taff; Carmelle T Norice; David R Andes; Frederick Lanni; Aaron P Mitchell Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Yassamin N Albayaty; Nicky Thomas; Paulina D Ramírez-García; Thomas P Davis; John F Quinn; Michael R Whittaker; Clive A Prestidge Journal: Drug Deliv Transl Res Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 4.617