| Literature DB >> 29755472 |
Gloria Hoi Wan Tso1, Jose Antonio Reales-Calderon1, Norman Pavelka1.
Abstract
Candidemia is a bloodstream fungal infection caused by Candida species and is most commonly observed in hospitalized patients. Even with proper antifungal drug treatment, mortality rates remain high at 40-50%. Therefore, prophylactic or preemptive antifungal medications are currently recommended in order to prevent infections in high-risk patients. Moreover, the majority of women experience at least one episode of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) throughout their lifetime and many of them suffer from recurrent VVC (RVVC) with frequent relapses for the rest of their lives. While there currently exists no definitive cure, the only available treatment for RVVC is again represented by antifungal drug therapy. However, due to the limited number of existing antifungal drugs, their associated side effects and the increasing occurrence of drug resistance, other approaches are greatly needed. An obvious prevention measure for candidemia or RVVC relapse would be to immunize at-risk patients with a vaccine effective against Candida infections. In spite of the advanced and proven techniques successfully applied to the development of antibacterial or antiviral vaccines, however, no antifungal vaccine is still available on the market. In this review, we first summarize various efforts to date in the development of anti-Candida vaccines, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of each strategy. We next unfold and discuss general hurdles encountered along these efforts, such as the existence of large genomic variation and phenotypic plasticity across Candida strains and species, and the difficulty in mounting protective immune responses in immunocompromised or immunosuppressed patients. Lastly, we review the concept of "trained immunity" and discuss how induction of this rapid and nonspecific immune response may potentially open new and alternative preventive strategies against opportunistic infections by Candida species and potentially other pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Candida; candidemia; candidiasis; immunocompromised patients; opportunistic infections; trained immunity; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29755472 PMCID: PMC5934487 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Summary of past and current anti-Candida vaccine candidates.
| Vaccine category | Description | Clinical trial stage | Protection ( | Cross-protection (non- | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | Hyphal-defective | SYS | ( | ||
| LA | MAP kinase-defective | SYS | ( | ||
| LA | Cell wall-defective | SYS | ( | ||
| LA | Filamentation-repressible | SYS | ( | ||
| LA | Yeast-locked | SYS | ( | ||
| LA | Heat-killed or live | SYS | ( | ||
| REC | Recombinant N-terminus of | SYS, VAG, OR | ( | ||
| REC | Recombinant N-terminus of | SYS, VAG | ( | ||
| REC | Recombinant N-terminus of | Phase II | SYS, VAG | ( | |
| REC | Recombinant | VAG | ( | ||
| REC | Recombinant | Phase I | VAG | ( | |
| REC | Recombinant | SYS | ( | ||
| REC | Recombinant | SYS | ( | ||
| EX | Crude cell wall extract | SYS | ( | ||
| GC | Mannans and peptide conjugates | SYS | ( | ||
| GC | β-glucan conjugated with MF59 adjuvant | VAG | ( | ||
| GC | Laminarin conjugated with diphtheria toxoid (Lam-CRM197) | SYS, VAG | ( |
LA, live attenuated; REC, recombinant; EX, extract; GC, glycoconjugate; SYS, systemic; VAG, vaginal; OR, oral.
Figure 1Sources of variability in Candida-related infections. The figure illustrates the plethora of variations at the level of the pathogen and the host, which pose serious challenges in the development of an antifungal vaccine. On the pathogen side, Candida species display large phenotypic, morphological, and genetic variation and dynamics; on the host side, candidiasis can occur in different types of patients, with different types of immune system dysfunction or carrying different genetic polymorphisms, and in different anatomical sites. Taken together, this broad and diverse clinical spectrum of the disease makes it difficult to design a “one-size-fits-all” vaccine that would protect all these different patients from all these different types of fungal infection.
Figure 2Vaccination strategies targeting adaptive or innate immune memory. (A) Classical vaccines initially induce a slow adaptive immune response. During this primary response, however, adaptive immune memory is raised, allowing for a more rapid and stronger secondary response upon encounter of the targeted pathogen. This protection is very long-lived, but is limited to the antigens present in the vaccine. (B) Most vaccines also induce a very rapid innate immune response. During this primary response, some vaccines also “train” innate immune cells, allowing for a stronger secondary innate response against pathogens. One advantage of this innate immune memory is the non-specificity of the secondary response, which could potentially lead to broadly cross-protective vaccines. A potential disadvantage would be the relatively shorter time window of protection.