Literature DB >> 35265178

Bone density and its relation to the development of acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Shawn T Yeazell1, Jordan Inacio2, Ajith Malige1, Hannah Dailey2, Gregory F Carolan1.   

Abstract

Background: Postoperative acromial stress fracture is a troublesome postoperative complication after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Our study aims to utilize routinely performed preoperative computed tomography scans to identify differences in the material properties of the acromion in patients who did and did not develop a postoperative acromial stress fracture.
Methods: Treatment records and computed tomography scans for 99 reverse shoulder arthroplasties were collected. Scans were calibrated using a phantom and transferred for post-processing where the acromion, full scapula, and humeral head were isolated. The final segmented model was used to assess acromial volume and volumetric bone mineral density for each region of interest.
Results: There was no association between age and volumetric bone mineral density in any region of interest (all R 2 ≤ 0.048, all p > 0.082). Patients who developed an acromial stress fracture were not significantly different from those who did not in terms of age, acromial volume, or acromial volumetric bone mineral density (all p > 0.559). Patients with known osteoporosis or osteopenia had slightly lower volumetric bone mineral density, but the differences were not significant (all p ≥ 0.072).
Conclusion: Postoperative acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty cannot be predicted by computed tomography-derived volumetric bone mineral density or volume. These mechanical characteristics also do not predictably decrease with age or osteoporosis diagnosis.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromial stress fracture; acromial stress reaction; bone density; osteoporosis; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; volume

Year:  2020        PMID: 35265178      PMCID: PMC8899318          DOI: 10.1177/1758573220949992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  26 in total

1.  The relationship between acromion thickness and body habitus: practical implications in subacromial decompression procedures.

Authors:  Stefano Gumina; Paolo Albino; Stefano Carbone; Valerio Arceri; Daniele Passaretti; Vittorio Candela; Annarita Vestri; Franco Postacchini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-04-18

Review 2.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Gerber; Scott D Pennington; Richard W Nyffeler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Acromial fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nady Hamid; Patrick M Connor; James F Fleischli; Donald F D'Alessandro
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2011-07

4.  Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification.

Authors:  Randall J Otto; Nazeem A Virani; Jonathan C Levy; Phillip T Nigro; Derek J Cuff; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Acromion morphology and bone mineral density distribution suggest favorable fixation points for anatomic acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Voss; Felix Dyrna; Andrea Achtnich; Alex Hoberman; Elifho Obopilwe; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: classification and treatment.

Authors:  Lynn A Crosby; Adam Hamilton; Todd Twiss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. a minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Jonathan C Levy; Derek Pupello; Steven Siegal; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  M Rittmeister; F Kerschbaumer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  J C Levy; N Virani; D Pupello; M Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-02

10.  Implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has an impact on acromial stresses.

Authors:  Murray T Wong; G Daniel G Langohr; George S Athwal; James A Johnson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.