Literature DB >> 28434036

Acromion morphology and bone mineral density distribution suggest favorable fixation points for anatomic acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Andreas Voss1,2, Felix Dyrna1,2, Andrea Achtnich2, Alex Hoberman1, Elifho Obopilwe1, Andreas B Imhoff2, Augustus D Mazzocca3, Knut Beitzel2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent techniques for acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction focus on additional AC cerclage to coracoclavicular (CC)-reconstructions. Due to the specific slim bone morphology at the acromion, there are concerns regarding these additional bone tunnels, as they may predispose to fracture and break out. The purpose of this study was to investigate anatomic properties of the acromion which may help improve surgical techniques directed at injuries to the AC joint. It was hypothesized that via measurements of thickness and density points of increased strength and support could be identified on the acromion.
METHODS: Eighty-five fresh frozen cadaveric shoulders were used for this study. A standardized 3D-net was developed and thicknesses of the acromion were taken from defined points using a certified caliper. To define the acromial arch, the angle and radius of curvature between the antero-lateral, the highest point of the acromial arch and the postero-lateral aspect of the acromion were measured. Additional bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation was performed on 43 specimens in an anterio-posterior and latero-medial direction using 5-mm slices with a maximum of 10 and 6 slices, respectively.
RESULTS: Median specimen age was 63.0 (range 36) years (55 female, and 30 male). There was no statistical significance between male (62.0, range: 35 years) and female (64.5, range 32 years) regarding age (n.s.). Thickness of acromion points of interest were ranging from 3.5 to 24.3 mm. Median radius of curvature of acromial arch for female was 48.2 (range 92.7) mm and 66.2 (range 85.6) for male (p = 0.019). The median angle for female specimens was 21.4° (range: 44.6°) and 23.3° (range 51.7°) for male (p = 0.047). The latero-medial measurements showed significant difference between the region of interest (ROI): 1 and 4, 5, 6 (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.001), 2 and 4, 5, 6 (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, p = 0.001), 3 and 5, 6 (p = 0.001, p = 0.001), 4 and 5, 6 (p = 0.010, p = 0.001). Antero-posterior measurements showed significant difference between the ROI: 1 and 8 (p = 0.031).
CONCLUSION: The posterior-medial acromion close to the AC joint revealed the highest BMD with an increasing density from lateral to medial. In combination with thickness measurements this region would support additional anatomical fixation of the AC joint using bone tunnels if necessary. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To anatomically reproduce the insertions of the AC ligaments at the acromion, either bone tunnels or anchors are needed. Therefore, several techniques have been developed. This study provides the anatomical data for these techniques and confirms the reconstructive approach of techniques using anatomical points of fixation and orientation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC joint; Acromion; Anatomy; Bone mineral density thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28434036     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4539-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

1.  Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics.

Authors:  R E Debski; I M Parsons; S L Woo; F H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Anatomy of the coraco-acromial arch. Relation to degeneration of the acromion.

Authors:  J G Edelson; C Taitz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-07

3.  Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  Paul W Grutter; Steve A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: a comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Steven J Lee; Stephen J Nicholas; Kenneth H Akizuki; Malachy P McHugh; Ian J Kremenic; Simon Ben-Avi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  The prevalence of Os acromiale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kaissar Yammine
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Acromioclavicular joint injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association football: data from the 2004-2005 through 2008-2009 National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System.

Authors:  Jason L Dragoo; Hillary J Braun; Stephen E Bartlinski; Alex H S Harris
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: current concepts.

Authors:  Mark Tauber
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Arthroscopically Assisted Treatment of Acute Dislocations of the Acromioclavicular Joint.

Authors:  Sepp Braun; Knut Beitzel; Stefan Buchmann; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-09

9.  Arthroscopically Assisted Reconstruction of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: Anatomic AC Ligament Reconstruction With Protective Internal Bracing-The "AC-RecoBridge" Technique.

Authors:  Kaywan Izadpanah; Martin Jaeger; Peter Ogon; Norbert P Südkamp; Dirk Maier
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-04-13

10.  The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas.

Authors:  G P Nicholson; D A Goodman; E L Flatow; L U Bigliani
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bone density and its relation to the development of acromial stress fracture following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shawn T Yeazell; Jordan Inacio; Ajith Malige; Hannah Dailey; Gregory F Carolan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-08-27

2.  Risk of fracture of the acromion depends on size and orientation of acromial bone tunnels when performing acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Celso Cruz Timm de Oliveira; Michael Nowak; Andreas Voss; Elifho Obopilwe; Sepp Braun; Leo Pauzenberger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Efficacy of Transosseous Tunnel Placement for Triple Endobutton Plate in Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction: A Three-Dimensional Printing Guide Design Technology.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Youliang Wen; Meng-Yao Zhang; Xin Zhou; Shi-Jie Fu; Guo-You Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.