Literature DB >> 23659805

Scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation of risk factors and the reliability of a proposed classification.

Randall J Otto1, Nazeem A Virani, Jonathan C Levy, Phillip T Nigro, Derek J Cuff, Mark A Frankle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims were to determine the sensitivity of plain radiographs to detect scapular fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), to test the reliability of a proposed classification, and to evaluate risk factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We matched 53 patients with scapular fractures after RSA to 212 control patients. Clinical risk factors were assessed by correlating comorbidities. Independent observers reviewed radiographs to assess fracture detection accuracy and test the reliability of a proposed classification. Radiographic risks were evaluated by measuring acromial thickness, acromial tilt, glenoid-to-tuberosity distance, and acromion-to-tuberosity (AT) distance.
RESULTS: Independent reviewers accurately diagnosed 78.8% of fractures and 97.4% of controls with good inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.782) and excellent intrarater reliability (κ = 0.862). Inter-rater reliability of the classification was moderate (κ = 0.422). Osteoporosis significantly increased the risk of fracture (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.91); however, no difference was found for other comorbidities or between preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters. A significant difference occurred between groups from the postoperative radiographs to the most recent radiographs for AT distance (0.4 ± 5.5 mm for control group and 8.3 ± 7.6 mm for fracture group, P < .001) and acromial tilt (1.8° ± 6.3° for control group and 14° ± 15° for fracture group, P < .001). Of 16 scapular spine fractures, 14 occurred from a screw tip; however, screw orientation and length were not different between groups.
CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is a significant risk factor for scapular fractures after RSA. The current classification has only moderate reliability, suggesting that an alternative classification method is needed. Decreasing AT distance and increasing acromial tilt on consecutive radiographs may improve fracture detection. Advanced imaging may be needed to confirm the diagnosis. Whereas most scapular spine fractures occurred from a screw, the surgical technique did not increase the relative risk.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromial fractures; Case-Control Design; Crosby classification; Diagnostic Study; Level IV; interobserver reliability; intraobserver reliability; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23659805     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  31 in total

Review 1.  Arm lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Tom Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Paul DeVito; Dimitri S Tahal; Dragomir Mijc; Bijan Ameri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ian P Mayne; Simon N Bell; Warwick Wright; Jennifer A Coghlan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-01-25

4.  Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.

Authors:  Anna Maria Kubicka; Jakub Stefaniak; Przemysław Lubiatowski; Jan Długosz; Marcin Dzianach; Marcin Redman; Janusz Piontek; Leszek Romanowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Periprosthetic Fractures in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts and Advances in Management.

Authors:  Christopher M Brusalis; Samuel A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-08

6.  Anatomical reconstruction to treat acromion fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Hess; Ralph Zettl; Daniel Smolen; Christoph Knoth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Management of painful reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anders L Ekelund
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-04-09

8.  Management of complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hanbing S Zhou; Justin S Chung; Paul H Yi; Xinning Li; Mark D Price
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

9.  Acromion Compromise Does Not Significantly Affect Clinical Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Lawrence V Gulotta; Joshua S Dines; David M Dines; Russell F Warren; Edward V Craig; Samuel A Taylor
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 10.  Acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon C Lau; Richard Large
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.