Melissa Z Braganza1, Elsa Pearson2,3, Cecille Joan Avila2,3, Dave Zlowe4, John Øvretveit5, Amy M Kilbourne1,6. 1. Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 2. Partnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center, Veterans Health Administration, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Office of Enterprise Integration, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 5. C7 Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institute Medical University Stockholm, and Research and Development Officer Region Stockholm Health Care, Solna, Sweden. 6. Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the design and impact of a systematic, enterprise-wide process for engaging US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) leadership in prioritizing scarce implementation and evaluation resources. DATA SOURCES: From 2017 to 2021, the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) identified priorities from local, regional, and national leaders through qualitative discussions and a national survey and tracked impacts via reports generated from competitively funded initiatives addressing these priorities. STUDY DESIGN: Guided by the Learning Health System framework and QUERI Implementation Roadmap, QUERI engaged stakeholders to nominate and rank-order priorities, peer-reviewed and funded initiatives to scale up and spread evidence-based practices (EBPs) using theory-based implementation strategies, and evaluated the impact of these initiatives using the QUERI Impact Framework. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: QUERI collected priority nominations through qualitative discussions and a web-based survey, and live voting was used to rank-order priorities. QUERI-funded teams regularly submitted progress reports describing the key activities, findings, and impacts of the quality improvement (QI) initiatives using a standardized form created in the VA Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: QUERI launched five QI initiatives to address priorities selected by VA leadership. In partnership with 28 health system leaders, these initiatives are implementing 10 EBPs across 53 sites, supporting 1055 VA employees in delivering evidence-based care. The success of these initiatives led to an expansion of QUERI's process to address 2021 VA leadership priorities: virtual care, health disparities, delayed or suppressed care due to COVID-19, employee burnout, long-term and home care options, and quality and cost of community care. CONCLUSIONS: QUERI, a unique program embedded in a national integrated health system, deployed a novel approach to inform policy making and enhance the real-world impact of research through prioritization of limited resources, rigorous peer-review, and assessment of impacts on the health system, employees, and Veterans.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the design and impact of a systematic, enterprise-wide process for engaging US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) leadership in prioritizing scarce implementation and evaluation resources. DATA SOURCES: From 2017 to 2021, the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) identified priorities from local, regional, and national leaders through qualitative discussions and a national survey and tracked impacts via reports generated from competitively funded initiatives addressing these priorities. STUDY DESIGN: Guided by the Learning Health System framework and QUERI Implementation Roadmap, QUERI engaged stakeholders to nominate and rank-order priorities, peer-reviewed and funded initiatives to scale up and spread evidence-based practices (EBPs) using theory-based implementation strategies, and evaluated the impact of these initiatives using the QUERI Impact Framework. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: QUERI collected priority nominations through qualitative discussions and a web-based survey, and live voting was used to rank-order priorities. QUERI-funded teams regularly submitted progress reports describing the key activities, findings, and impacts of the quality improvement (QI) initiatives using a standardized form created in the VA Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: QUERI launched five QI initiatives to address priorities selected by VA leadership. In partnership with 28 health system leaders, these initiatives are implementing 10 EBPs across 53 sites, supporting 1055 VA employees in delivering evidence-based care. The success of these initiatives led to an expansion of QUERI's process to address 2021 VA leadership priorities: virtual care, health disparities, delayed or suppressed care due to COVID-19, employee burnout, long-term and home care options, and quality and cost of community care. CONCLUSIONS: QUERI, a unique program embedded in a national integrated health system, deployed a novel approach to inform policy making and enhance the real-world impact of research through prioritization of limited resources, rigorous peer-review, and assessment of impacts on the health system, employees, and Veterans.
Authors: Megan E Vanneman; Alex H S Harris; Steven M Asch; Winifred J Scott; Samantha S Murrell; Todd H Wagner Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: George G Sayre; Emily L Neely; Carol E Simons; Christine A Sulc; David H Au; P Michael Ho Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Evelyn T Chang; Rebecca S Oberman; Amy N Cohen; Stephanie L Taylor; Elisa Gumm; Aram S Mardian; Shawn Toy; Araceli Revote; Britney Lewkowitz; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sara J Landes; JoAnn E Kirchner; John P Areno; Mark A Reger; Traci H Abraham; Jeffery A Pitcock; Mary J Bollinger; Katherine Anne Comtois Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-10-10
Authors: Melissa Z Braganza; Elsa Pearson; Cecille Joan Avila; Dave Zlowe; John Øvretveit; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.734