George G Sayre1,2, Emily L Neely3, Carol E Simons3, Christine A Sulc3, David H Au3,4, P Michael Ho5,6. 1. VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA. George.Sayre@va.gov. 2. Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. George.Sayre@va.gov. 3. VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 5. VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, CO, USA. 6. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Choice Program (VCP) was implemented to improve healthcare access by expanding healthcare options for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) enrollees. OBJECTIVES: To understand Veterans' experience accessing VCP care. DESIGN: Qualitative content analysis. SUBJECTS: Forty-seven veterans from three medical centers in three of the five VA geographical regions. APPROACH: We used semi-structured telephone interviews designed to elicit descriptions of Veterans' experiences. Data was analyzed using iterative, inductive, and deductive content analysis. Broad themes were identified based on representative interview responses. KEY RESULTS: We identified six themes: general impressions (concept and frustration); preferred source of care (institution, specialty, and individual provider); facilitators (VA staff facilitation and proactive Veterans); barriers (complexity, lack of responsiveness, lack of local providers, and poor coordination); perceived sources of VCP problems (learning curve, leadership and staff, and politics); and unintended negative impact (responsibility for costs of care and discontinued access to community care). DISCUSSION: Most Veterans who had received care through the VCP felt that it improved their access to care. However, accessing care through the VCP is a complex process that requires proactive Veterans and active support from the VA, third-party administrators, and availability of participating community providers. Veterans' abilities to navigate this process and the level of support provided varied widely. Even patients who did receive care through VCP found the process challenging. Greater support is needed for some Veterans to successfully access VCP care because Veterans who need care the most may be the least able to access it.
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Choice Program (VCP) was implemented to improve healthcare access by expanding healthcare options for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) enrollees. OBJECTIVES: To understand Veterans' experience accessing VCP care. DESIGN: Qualitative content analysis. SUBJECTS: Forty-seven veterans from three medical centers in three of the five VA geographical regions. APPROACH: We used semi-structured telephone interviews designed to elicit descriptions of Veterans' experiences. Data was analyzed using iterative, inductive, and deductive content analysis. Broad themes were identified based on representative interview responses. KEY RESULTS: We identified six themes: general impressions (concept and frustration); preferred source of care (institution, specialty, and individual provider); facilitators (VA staff facilitation and proactive Veterans); barriers (complexity, lack of responsiveness, lack of local providers, and poor coordination); perceived sources of VCP problems (learning curve, leadership and staff, and politics); and unintended negative impact (responsibility for costs of care and discontinued access to community care). DISCUSSION: Most Veterans who had received care through the VCP felt that it improved their access to care. However, accessing care through the VCP is a complex process that requires proactive Veterans and active support from the VA, third-party administrators, and availability of participating community providers. Veterans' abilities to navigate this process and the level of support provided varied widely. Even patients who did receive care through VCP found the process challenging. Greater support is needed for some Veterans to successfully access VCP care because Veterans who need care the most may be the least able to access it.
Entities:
Keywords:
Veterans; access to care; care transitions; program evaluation; qualitative research
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Lucas M Donovan; Scott S Coggeshall; Laura J Spece; Matthew F Griffith; Brian N Palen; Elizabeth C Parsons; Jeffrey A Todd-Stenberg; Thomas J Glorioso; Evan P Carey; Laura C Feemster; Steven B Zeliadt; Susan Kirsh; David H Au Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Michael J Fine; Roslyn A Stone; Shasha Gao; Leslie R M Hausmann; Kelly H Burkitt; Peter A Taber; Galen E Switzer; Chester B Good; Megan E Vanneman; Susan L Zickmund Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Melissa Z Braganza; Elsa Pearson; Cecille Joan Avila; Dave Zlowe; John Øvretveit; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Winn Cashion; Walid F Gellad; Florentina E Sileanu; Maria K Mor; Michael J Fine; Jennifer Hale; Daniel E Hall; Shari Rogal; Galen Switzer; Mohan Ramkumar; Virginia Wang; Douglas A Bronson; Mark Wilson; William Gunnar; Steven D Weisbord Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Samuel Edwards; Alex Hickok; Meike Niederhausen; Frances M Weaver; Elizabeth Tarlov; Howard Gordon; Reside L Jacob; Brian Bartle; Allison O'Neill; Rebecca Young; Avery Laliberte Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Kevin T Stroupe; Rachael Martinez; Timothy P Hogan; Elisa J Gordon; Beverly Gonzalez; Ibuola Kale; Chad Osteen; Elizabeth Tarlov; Frances M Weaver; Denise M Hynes; Bridget M Smith Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Kristin M Mattocks; A Rani Elwy; Elizabeth M Yano; Justin Giovannelli; Michael Adelberg; Michelle A Mengeling; Kristin J Cunningham; Kameron L Matthews Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 3.734