Megan E Vanneman1, Alex H S Harris, Steven M Asch, Winifred J Scott, Samantha S Murrell, Todd H Wagner. 1. *VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Innovations, Decision-Enhancement and Analytics Center (IDEAS 2.0) †Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology ‡Department of Population Health Sciences, Division of Health System Innovation & Research, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT §VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park ∥Department of Surgery ¶Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Choice Program (VCP), enacted by Congress after concerns surfaced about access, enables veterans to receive care outside Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. Veterans who face long wait times, large driving distances, or particular hardships are eligible for VCP. Prior purchased care programs were comparatively limited in scope. OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe utilization of VHA-provided and purchased outpatient care by veterans eligible for VCP before and after VCP implementation. We focused on veterans recently eligible for VHA as they are of particular policy relevance and might have less established care patterns. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified all Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who were eligible for VCP in 2015. We tabulated their use of VHA and purchased outpatient care for 3 years before (FY2012-2014) and 1 year after VCP implementation (FY2015). SUBJECTS: Our study population consisted of 214,449 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who were eligible for VCP due to wait-time, distance, or hardship issues. RESULTS: In the first year of the program, 3821 (2%) of these Iraq and Afghanistan veterans used non-VHA services through VCP. Per capita VHA utilization tended to decline slightly after VCP implementation, but these changes varied by type of outpatient care. CONCLUSIONS: There was low uptake of VCP services in the first year of the program. Data from additional years are needed to better understand the impact of this policy.
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Choice Program (VCP), enacted by Congress after concerns surfaced about access, enables veterans to receive care outside Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. Veterans who face long wait times, large driving distances, or particular hardships are eligible for VCP. Prior purchased care programs were comparatively limited in scope. OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe utilization of VHA-provided and purchased outpatient care by veterans eligible for VCP before and after VCP implementation. We focused on veterans recently eligible for VHA as they are of particular policy relevance and might have less established care patterns. RESEARCH DESIGN: We identified all Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who were eligible for VCP in 2015. We tabulated their use of VHA and purchased outpatient care for 3 years before (FY2012-2014) and 1 year after VCP implementation (FY2015). SUBJECTS: Our study population consisted of 214,449 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who were eligible for VCP due to wait-time, distance, or hardship issues. RESULTS: In the first year of the program, 3821 (2%) of these Iraq and Afghanistan veterans used non-VHA services through VCP. Per capita VHA utilization tended to decline slightly after VCP implementation, but these changes varied by type of outpatient care. CONCLUSIONS: There was low uptake of VCP services in the first year of the program. Data from additional years are needed to better understand the impact of this policy.
Authors: Virginia Wang; Cynthia J Coffman; Karen M Stechuchak; Theodore S Z Berkowitz; Paul L Hebert; David Edelman; Ann M O'Hare; Susan T Crowley; Hollis J Weidenbacher; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Amy K Rosen; Todd H Wagner; Warren B P Pettey; Michael Shwartz; Qi Chen; Jeanie Lo; William J O'Brien; Megan E Vanneman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-09-24 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Megan E Vanneman; Mary Jo Larson; Cheng Chen; Rachel Sayko Adams; Thomas V Williams; Esther Meerwijk; Alex H S Harris Journal: Med Care Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Virginia Wang; Cynthia J Coffman; Karen M Stechuchak; Theodore S Z Berkowitz; Paul L Hebert; David Edelman; Ann M O'Hare; Hollis J Weidenbacher; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Michael J Fine; Roslyn A Stone; Shasha Gao; Leslie R M Hausmann; Kelly H Burkitt; Peter A Taber; Galen E Switzer; Chester B Good; Megan E Vanneman; Susan L Zickmund Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrea L Nevedal; Todd H Wagner; Laura S Ellerbe; Steven M Asch; Christopher J Koenig Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Samuel Edwards; Alex Hickok; Meike Niederhausen; Frances M Weaver; Elizabeth Tarlov; Howard Gordon; Reside L Jacob; Brian Bartle; Allison O'Neill; Rebecca Young; Avery Laliberte Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Adam J Gordon; Sonya E Gabrielian; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; John R Blosnich; Allyson L Varley; Aerin J deRussy; Erika L Austin; April E Hoge; Young-Il Kim; Lillian Gelberg; Stefan G Kertesz Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.178