| Literature DB >> 35208022 |
Mengying Yang1,2,3,4, Dingding Xiang2,4,5, Yuru Chen1,3,4, Yangyang Cui1,3,4, Song Wang4, Weiqiang Liu1,3,4.
Abstract
Disc herniation is one of the most ubiquitous healthcare problems in modern cities-severe patients eventually require surgical intervention. However, the existing operations-spinal fusion and artificial disc replacement-alter the biomechanics of the spine, leaving much room for improvement. The appropriateness of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) for biomedical applications has been recognised due to its high water content, excellent biocompatibility, and versatile mechanical properties in the area of artificial cartilage and knee meniscus. In this study, a newly-designed PVA-bacterial cellulose (PVA-BC) composite was assembled to mimic both the biomechanics and annular structure of natural intervertebral discs (IVDs). PVA-BC composites of various concentrations were fabricated and tested under unconfined compression and compressive creep in order to acquire the values of the normalised compressive stiffness and whole normalised deformation. The normalised compressive stiffness increased considerably with an increasing PVA concentration, spanning from 1.82 (±0.18) to 3.50 (±0.14) MPa, and the whole normalised deformation decreased from 0.25 to 0.13. Formulations of 40% PVA provided the most accurate mimicry of natural human IVDs in normalised whole deformation, and demonstrated higher dimensional stability. The biocompatible results further confirmed that the materials had excellent biocompatibility. The novel bionic structure and formulations of the PVA-BC materials mimicked the biomechanics and structure of natural IVDs, and ensured dimensional stability under prolonged compression, reducing the risk of impingement on the surrounding tissue. The PVA-BC composite is a promising material for third-generation artificial IVDs with integrated construction.Entities:
Keywords: PVA-BC; biomechanics; creep; intervertebral disc; unconfined compression
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208022 PMCID: PMC8875496 DOI: 10.3390/ma15041481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(A) Illustration of the PVA-BC composite fabrication process. (B) Formulations for the PVA-BC composite.
Figure 2(A) Diagram of the mechanical test. (B) Loading regime of the unconfined compression. (C) Loading regime of the compressive creep.
Figure 3(A) SEM image illustrating the nanofibres in a single layer in BC (30.0 kx). (B) SEM image of the multiple layers in natural AF (10.0 kx). (C) SEM image of the network in crosslinked PVA (20.0 kx). (D) SEM image of natural NP (20.0 kx). (E) Cross-section of the PVA-BC composite with multiple layers of BC in white, outside, and the inner transparent zone of crosslinked PVA. (F) Cross-section of natural IVD.
Figure 4Typical unconfined compression load-displacement hysteresis curves for 15–40% PVA and the porcine disc.
Mean (standard deviation) for measured mechanical parameter values for each PVA-BC composite.
| Specimen | Compressive Stiffness (N/mm) | Step Displacement (mm) | Creep Displacement (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 64.23 (6.39) | 3.925 (0.36) | 1.035 (0.05) |
| 15% PVA+4 g BC (3FTCs) | 85.66 (4.96) | 2.94 (0.16) | 1.57 (0.25) |
| 15% PVA+4 g BC (6FTCs) | 79.90 (0.61) | 3.12 (0.03) | 1.96 (0.37) |
| 20% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 66.46 (10.46) | 3.83 (0.64) | 1.07 (0.25) |
| 25% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 67.62 (6.77) | 3.76 (0.36) | 0.97 (0.02) |
| 30% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 63.06 (2.01) | 3.99 (0.14) | 0.99 (0.12) |
| 35% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 87.52 (3.59) | 2.85 (0.13) | 0.82 (0.18) |
| 40% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 123.48 (4.79) | 2.04 (0.08) | 0.53 (0.18) |
| 40% PVA+6 g BC (3FTCs) | 117.25 (1.32) | 2.15 (0.02) | 0.70 (0.01) |
| 40% PVA+6 g BC (6FTCs) | 111.77 (20.15) | 2.28 (0.42) | 0.81 (0.16) |
Values are presented as mean over (standard deviation).
Mean (standard deviation) for normalised mechanical parameter values for each PVA-BC composite.
| Specimen | Normalised Compressive Stiffness (MPa) | Normalised Step Displacement | Normalised Creep Displacement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 1.82 (0.18) | 0.20 (0.02) | 0.05 (0.00) |
| 15% PVA+4 g BC (3FTCs) | 2.42 (0.14) | 0.15 (0.01) | 0.08 (0.01) |
| 15% PVA+4 g BC (6FTCs) | 2.26 (0.02) | 0.16 (0.00) | 0.10 (0.02) |
| 20% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 1.88 (0.30) | 0.19 (0.03) | 0.05 (0.01) |
| 25% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 1.91 (0.19) | 0.19 (0.02) | 0.05 (0.00) |
| 30% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 1.79 (0.06) | 0.20 (0.01) | 0.05 (0.01) |
| 35% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 2.48 (0.10) | 0.14 (0.01) | 0.04 (0.01) |
| 40% PVA+2 g BC (3FTCs) | 3.50 (0.14) | 0.10 (0.00) | 0.03 (0.01) |
| 40% PVA+6 g BC (3FTCs) | 3.32 (0.04) | 0.11 (0.00) | 0.04 (0.00) |
| 40% PVA+6 g BC (6FTCs) | 3.16 (0.57) | 0.11 (0.02) | 0.04 (0.01) |
Values are presented as mean over (standard deviation).
Figure 5Whole normalised deformation of each PVA-BC composite under compression.
Figure 6Normalised compressive stiffness of the specimens containing 2 g BC after 3FTCs under compression.
Figure 7Effects of the number of FTCs and the BC weight on the normalised compressive stiffness of (A) 15% and (B) 40% PVA.
Absorbance and cell viability in the cytotoxicity tests.
| Group | Trial group(MEM + PVA-BC) | Blank control group(MEM) | Positive control group (MEM+DMSO) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.847 (0.117) | 0.826 (0.070) | 0.304 (0.030) |
|
| 102.604 (14.136) | - | 36.839 (3.639) |
Values are presented as mean over (standard deviation).
Figure 8(A) 5% PVA + 2 g BC (3FTCs) without compression after manufacturing. (B) 10% PVA + 2 g BC (3FTCs) after unconfined compression (a maximum compression of 500 N).