Literature DB >> 15534420

Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature.

Paul Park1, Hugh J Garton, Vishal C Gala, Julian T Hoff, John E McGillicuddy.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review of the literature.
OBJECTIVES: Review the definition, etiology, incidence, and risk factors associated with as well as potential treatment options. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The development of pathology at the mobile segment next to a lumbar or lumbosacral spinal fusion has been termed adjacent segment disease. Initially reported to occur rarely, it is now considered a potential late complication of spinal fusion that can necessitate further surgical intervention and adversely affect outcomes.
METHODS: MEDLINE literature search.
RESULTS: The most common abnormal finding at the adjacent segment is disc degeneration. Biomechanical changes consisting of increased intradiscal pressure, increased facet loading, and increased mobility occur after fusion and have been implicated in causing adjacent segment disease. Progressive spinal degeneration with age is also thought to be a major contributor. From a radiographic standpoint, reported incidence during average postoperative follow-up observation ranging from 36 to 369 months varies substantially from 5.2 to 100%. Incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease is lower, however, ranging from 5.2 to 18.5% during 44.8 to 164 months of follow-up observation. The rate of symptomatic adjacent segment disease is higher in patients with transpedicular instrumentation (12.2-18.5%) compared with patients fused with other forms of instrumentation or with no instrumentation (5.2-5.6%). Potential risk factors include instrumentation, fusion length, sagittal malalignment, facet injury, age, and pre-existing degenerative changes.
CONCLUSION: Biomechanical alterations likely play a primary role in causing adjacent segment disease. Radiographically apparent, asymptomatic adjacent segment disease is common but does not correlate with functional outcomes. Potentially modifiable risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease include fusion without instrumentation, protecting the facet joint of the adjacent segment during placement of pedicle screws,fusion length, and sagittal balance. Surgical management, when indicated, consists of decompression of neural elements and extension of fusion. Outcomes after surgery, however, are modest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534420     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  293 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance.

Authors:  Mourad Ould-Slimane; Thibaut Lenoir; Cyril Dauzac; Ludovic Rillardon; Etienne Hoffmann; Pierre Guigui; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Regenerating nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disc using biodegradable nanofibrous polymer scaffolds.

Authors:  Ganjun Feng; Zhanpeng Zhang; Xiaobing Jin; Jiang Hu; Melanie J Gupte; Jeremy M Holzwarth; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Evaluation of ABM/P-15 versus autogenous bone in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.

Authors:  Blake P Sherman; Emily M Lindley; A Simon Turner; Howard B Seim; James Benedict; Evalina L Burger; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Analysis of biomechanical changes after removal of instrumentation in lumbar arthrodesis by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Seong-Hwan Moon; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hak-Sun Kim; Jin-Oh Park; Eun-Su Moon; Joon-Seok Sohn; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Injection of human umbilical tissue-derived cells into the nucleus pulposus alters the course of intervertebral disc degeneration in vivo.

Authors:  Steven K Leckie; Gwendolyn A Sowa; Bernard P Bechara; Robert A Hartman; Joao Paulo Coelho; William T Witt; Qing D Dong; Brent W Bowman; Kevin M Bell; Nam V Vo; Brian C Kramer; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  [Adjacent segment movement after monosegmental total disc replacement and monosegmental fusion of segments L4/5].

Authors:  M Däxle; T Kocak; F Lattig; H Reichel; B Cakir
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Injectable cellulose-based hydrogels as nucleus pulposus replacements: Assessment of in vitro structural stability, ex vivo herniation risk, and in vivo biocompatibility.

Authors:  Huizi Anna Lin; Devika M Varma; Warren W Hom; Michelle A Cruz; Philip R Nasser; Robert G Phelps; James C Iatridis; Steven B Nicoll
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.