| Literature DB >> 31635284 |
Andreia Sofia Oliveira1,2, Oumar Seidi3, Nuno Ribeiro4,5,6, Rogério Colaço7, Ana Paula Serro8,9.
Abstract
Designing materials for cartilage replacement raises several challenges due to the complexity of the natural tissue and its unique tribomechanical properties. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogels have been explored for such purpose since they are biocompatible, present high chemical stability, and their properties may be tailored through different strategies. In this work, the influence of preparation conditions of PVA hydrogels on its morphology, water absorption capacity, thermotropic behavior, mechanical properties, and tribological performance was evaluated and compared with those of human cartilage (HC). The hydrogels were obtained by cast-drying (CD) and freeze-thawing (FT), in various conditions. It was found that the method of preparation of the PVA hydrogels critically affects their microstructure and performance. CD gels presented a denser structure, absorbed less water, were stiffer, dissipated less energy, and withstood higher loads than FT gels. Moreover, they led to friction coefficients against stainless steel comparable with those of HC. Overall, CD hydrogels had a closer performance to natural HC, when compared to FT ones.Entities:
Keywords: cast-drying; freeze-thawing; human cartilage; mechanical properties; poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel; tribological behavior
Year: 2019 PMID: 31635284 PMCID: PMC6829290 DOI: 10.3390/ma12203413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Conditions of preparation of the cast-dried and freeze-thawed samples.
| Cast-Drying | Freeze-Thawing | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples | Drying Temperature (°C) | Samples | Freezing Time/Cycle (h) | Thawing Time/Cycle (h) | Number of Cycles | Pore-Forming Agent |
| CD 4 | 4 | |||||
| CD 20 | 20 | |||||
| CD 30 | 30 | |||||
| FT 23-1 (×15) | 23 | 1 | 15 | - | ||
| FT 21-3 (×15) | 21 | 3 | 15 | - | ||
| FT 21-3 (×10) | 21 | 3 | 10 | - | ||
| FT 10-2 (×5) | 10 | 2 | 5 | - | ||
| FT 10-2 (×5) + SC | 10 | 2 | 5 | NaCl (1:6 w/w) * | ||
| FT 10-2 (×5) + SB5 | 10 | 2 | 5 | NaHCO3 (5:1 w/w) * | ||
| FT 10-2 (×5) + SB8 | 10 | 2 | 5 | NaHCO3 (8:1 w/w) * | ||
* Ratios relative to PVA weight.
Figure 1SEM micrographs of PVA hydrogels’ (a–h,j,k) and human cartilage samples’ (i,l) surfaces.
Figure 2Swelling capacity of PVA hydrogels and human cartilage.
Figure 3Glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), and degree of crystallinity (χ) of PVA hydrogels.
Figure 4Equilibrium water content (EWC) values of PVA hydrogels and human cartilage. Fractions of free/loosely bound water and tightly bound water contained in the PVA samples.
Figure 5Typical compression stress-strain curves (a), elastic modulus variation (b), and elastic and dissipated energies (c) of PVA samples and human cartilage.
Figure 6Friction coefficients measured for the tribological sliding pairs hydrogel/SS 316L and human cartilage/SS 316L under 10 N of load using PBS as lubricant (a) and for CD hydrogels/SS 316L and human cartilage/SS 316L under 10 and 20 N of load using both PBS and SSF solutions as lubricants (b).