Stephan N Salzmann1, Nicolas Plais1, Jennifer Shue1, Federico P Girardi2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. GirardiF@hss.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lumbar disc replacement has been a surgical alternative to fusion surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) for many years. Despite enthusiasm after the approval of the first devices, implantation rates have remained low, especially in the USA. The goal of this review is to provide a general overview of lumbar disc replacement in order to comprehend the successes and obstacles to widespread adoption. RECENT FINDINGS: Although a large amount of evidence-based data including satisfactory long-term results is available, implantation rates in the USA have not increased in the last decade. Possible explanations for this include strict indications for use, challenging surgical techniques, lack of device selection, fear of late complications or revision surgeries, and reimbursement issues. Recent publications can address some of the past concerns, but there still remain obstacles to widespread adoption. Upcoming data on long-term outcome, implant durability and possible very late complications will determine the future of lumbar disc replacement surgery.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lumbar disc replacement has been a surgical alternative to fusion surgery for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) for many years. Despite enthusiasm after the approval of the first devices, implantation rates have remained low, especially in the USA. The goal of this review is to provide a general overview of lumbar disc replacement in order to comprehend the successes and obstacles to widespread adoption. RECENT FINDINGS: Although a large amount of evidence-based data including satisfactory long-term results is available, implantation rates in the USA have not increased in the last decade. Possible explanations for this include strict indications for use, challenging surgical techniques, lack of device selection, fear of late complications or revision surgeries, and reimbursement issues. Recent publications can address some of the past concerns, but there still remain obstacles to widespread adoption. Upcoming data on long-term outcome, implant durability and possible very late complications will determine the future of lumbar disc replacement surgery.
Authors: Jack E Zigler; Richard D Guyer; Scott L Blumenthal; Alexander M Satin; Jessica L Shellock; Donna D Ohnmeiss Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Alexandra Alcántara Guardado; Alexander Baker; Andrew Weightman; Judith A Hoyland; Glen Cooper Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) Date: 2022-01-19
Authors: Juliane D Glaeser; Khosrowdad Salehi; Linda E A Kanim; Zachary NaPier; Michael A Kropf; Jason M Cuéllar; Tiffany G Perry; Hyun W Bae; Dmitriy Sheyn Journal: Spine J Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Alec McCarthy; Kossi Loic M Avegnon; Phil A Holubeck; Demi Brown; Anik Karan; Navatha Shree Sharma; Johnson V John; Shelbie Weihs; Jazmin Ley; Jingwei Xie Journal: Mater Today Bio Date: 2021-11-26