| Literature DB >> 35204867 |
Sofía Magdalena Murga-Garrido1,2, Yaneth Citlalli Orbe-Orihuela1, Cinthya Estefhany Díaz-Benítez1, Ana Cristina Castañeda-Márquez1, Fernanda Cornejo-Granados3, Adrian Ochoa-Leyva3, Alejandro Sanchez-Flores4, Miguel Cruz5, Ana Isabel Burguete-García1, Alfredo Lagunas-Martínez1.
Abstract
Gut microbiota is associated with the development of metabolic disorders. To study its association with childhood obesity, we performed a cross-sectional study with 46 children (6-12 years old). We collected fecal samples, food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs), and anthropometric measurements. Shotgun metagenomics were used to obtain the microbial taxonomic diversity and metabolic potential. We identified two dietary profiles characterized by complex carbohydrates and proteins (pattern 1) and saturated fat and simple carbohydrates (pattern 2). We classified each participant into normal weight (NW) or overweight and obese (OWOB) using their body mass index (BMI) z-score. The ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes and alpha diversity were not different between the BMI groups. Genera contributing to beta diversity between NW and OWOB groups included Bacteroides rodentium, B. intestinalis, B. eggerthii, Methanobrevibacter smithii, Eubacterium sp., and Roseburia sp. B. rodentium was associated with lower BMI and dietary pattern 1 intake. Eubacterium sp. and Roseburia sp. were associated with BMI increments and high consumption of dietary pattern 2. Methane and energy metabolism were found enriched in under-represented KEGG pathways of NW group compared to OWOB. Complex dietary and microbiome interaction leads to metabolic differences during childhood, which should be elucidated to prevent metabolic diseases in adolescence and adulthood.Entities:
Keywords: childhood; dietary pattern; energy; gut microbiome; methane; obesity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35204867 PMCID: PMC8870140 DOI: 10.3390/children9020148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
General characteristics by BMI status of children from Mexico City.
| N = 46 | BMI Status | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | NW ( | OWOB ( | |
| Gender | Female | 12 (57%) | 9 (43%) |
| males | 15 (60%) | 10 (40%) | |
| Age (years old) | 8.03 ± 1.79 | 8.9 ± 2.1 | |
| Weight (kg) **** | 25.46 ± 7.29 | 40.91 ± 12.71 | |
| Height (cm) * | 127.77 ± 13 | 135.32 ± 12 | |
| Waist: Hip ** | 0.82 ± 0.037 | 0.86 ± 0.038 | |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 81.15 ± 12.2 | 81.85 ± 8.45 | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 75.23 ± 26.2 | 103.75 ± 46.43 | |
| Cholesterol | HDL(mg/dL) | 50.84 ± 10.04 | 50.85 ± 12.36 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 100.88 ± 28.68 | 110.55 ± 32.32 | |
| Total (mg/dL) | 152.96 ± 37.95 | 168.15 ± 42.16 | |
| TA | Systole (mean) | 93.84 ± 10.27 | 98.85 ± 10.41 |
| Diastole (mean) | 64.38 ± 9.15 | 65.12 ± 7.5 | |
| Physical activity (Mets) | 342.01 ± 293.75 | 399.86 ± 441.33 | |
| Family history of overweight/obesity (%) | 50% | 70% | |
The data in this table are presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables or percentage for categorical variables. Mean age was 8 years old for normal-weight group and almost 9 years for the group with overweight and obesity. Weight (p-value = 9.8 × 10−6), height (p-value = 0.02), and waist-to-hip ratio (p-value = 0.0022) resulted statistically different between both BMI classifications. Glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, and blood pressure (BP) values were not statistically different although OWOB group showed increased mean values compared to NW. Pairwise comparisons using WRST and t-test were performed to compare data from both groups. ns: p > 0.05, *: p <= 0.05, **: p <= 0.01, ****: p <= 0.0001.
Figure 1Phylum relative abundance of the 46 samples included in this study ordered by BMI.
Figure 2Alpha diversity, (A) Shannon Index (H), (B) Inversed Simpson diversity Index (1/D), and (C) Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio (F/B) of normal-weight and obese-overweight groups. NW group is shown in magenta color and OWO in yellow. ns: p > 0.05. Pairwise comparisons were obtained using WRST and t-test.
Figure 3Relative abundance of taxa that showed difference in normal-weight (NW, magenta) group compared to overweight-obese (OWOB, yellow). Pairwise comparisons using Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test adjusted by FDR: Bacteroides rodentium/uniformis p-value = 0.055, Bacteroides intestinalis p-value = 0.0012, Bacteroides eggerthii p-value = 0.073, Methanobrevibacter smithii p-value = 0.042, Eubacterium sp. CAG:180 p-value = 0.044, Roseburia species p-value = 0.098. *: p <= 0.05.
Association analysis between taxa and macronutrient percentage intake.
| N = 46 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| |
| Carbohydrates (%) | 0.002 | 0.08 | 0.001 | 0.046 | 0.0013 | 0.04 | 0.00009 | 0.9 | −0.0004 | 0.14 | −0.0003 | 0.8 |
| Lipids (%) | −0.003 | 0.06 | −0.0016 | 0.02 | −0.002 | 0.008 | 0.0006 | 0.43 | 0.0002 | 0.54 | 0.001 | 0.33 |
| Protein (%) | −0.0007 | 0.83 | 0.00005 | 0.97 | 0.0008 | 0.62 | −0.0035 | 0.046 | 0.0017 | 0.02 | −0.004 | 0.14 |
| Sugars (%) | −0.001 | 0.1 | −0.00009 | 0.74 | −0.0003 | 0.19 | 0.00003 | 0.92 | −0.00008 | 0.55 | 0.0016 | 0.007 |
| Fibers (%) | 0.001 | 0.42 | 0.0014 | 0.085 | 0.0017 | 0.04 | −0.0012 | 0.19 | 0.00074 | 0.06 | −0.004 | 0.022 |
| Saturated fats (%) | −0.001 | 0.17 | −0.0003 | 0.24 | −0.0003 | 0.33 | −0.0001 | 0.69 | 0.00002 | 0.86 | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| monounsaturated fats (%) | −0.0001 | 0.92 | 0.0006 | 0.37 | −0.0003 | 0.62 | −0.0007 | 0.4 | 0.00013 | 0.73 | −0.0018 | 0.25 |
| polyunsaturated fats (%) | 0.002 | 0.12 | 0.0006 | 0.35 | 0.0005 | 0.43 | 0.0005 | 0.49 | 0.000018 | 0.95 | −0.003 | 0.024 |
| Trans fat (%) | 0.011 | 0.26 | 0.0021 | 0.63 | 0.0032 | 0.49 | 0.004 | 0.41 | −0.0016 | 0.46 | −0.003 | 0.7 |
| Pattern 1 | 0.004 | 0.47 | 0.002 | 0.349 | 0.0036 | 0.18 | −0.0036 | 0.22 | 0.0029 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.07 |
| Pattern 2 | −0.008 | 0.14 | 0.00019 | 0.94 | 0.0002 | 0.92 | 0.0023 | 0.44 | −0.0005 | 0.66 | 0.0009 | 0.87 |
Association analysis (linear regression) between taxa and macronutrient percentage intake adjusted by age, sex, and family history of obesity.
Association analysis between taxa and BMI z-scores according to dietary pattern intake.
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dietary Pattern 1 | coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
|
| low | −0.97 | 0.28 | 0.89 | 0.19 | −1.93 | 0.29 | −1.89 | 0.11 | 15.93 | 0.059 | −108.5 | 0.91 |
| high | −2.42 | 0.013 | 2.25 | 0.17 | −2.65 | 0.16 | −45.6 | 0.66 | 0.102 | 0.97 | −1.72 | 0.16 |
| Dietary Pattern 2 | coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
| coef |
|
| low | −1.61 | 0.053 | −0.43 | 0.77 | −1.12 | 0.57 | −141.97 | 0.25 | 4.85 | 0.13 | −2.02 | 0.45 |
| high | −1.53 | 0.3 | 1.89 | 0.019 | −3.1 | 0.12 | −1.54 | 0.26 | 10.83 | 0.32 | −2.77 | 0.11 |
Association analysis between taxa and BMI z-scores according to dietary pattern intake. The linear regression model was adjusted by age, sex, family history of obesity, and by each pattern.
Figure 4MA-plot showing differential microbiota genes representation (KOs) between normal-weighted vs. overweight and obese children. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) p < 0.05; FDR adjusted p < 0.05. MA stands for the relationship between values of intensity (i.e., counts) and difference between the data (y-axis M = log ratio (log fold change) and x-axis A = mean, average of normalized counts).
Figure 5KEGG pathways over-represented (A) and under-represented (B) in NW group compared to OWOB.