MOTIVATION: Gene prediction in metagenomic sequences remains a difficult problem. Current sequencing technologies do not achieve sufficient coverage to assemble the individual genomes in a typical sample; consequently, sequencing runs produce a large number of short sequences whose exact origin is unknown. Since these sequences are usually smaller than the average length of a gene, algorithms must make predictions based on very little data. RESULTS: We present MetaProdigal, a metagenomic version of the gene prediction program Prodigal, that can identify genes in short, anonymous coding sequences with a high degree of accuracy. The novel value of the method consists of enhanced translation initiation site identification, ability to identify sequences that use alternate genetic codes and confidence values for each gene call. We compare the results of MetaProdigal with other methods and conclude with a discussion of future improvements. AVAILABILITY: The Prodigal software is freely available under the General Public License from http://code.google.com/p/prodigal/.
MOTIVATION: Gene prediction in metagenomic sequences remains a difficult problem. Current sequencing technologies do not achieve sufficient coverage to assemble the individual genomes in a typical sample; consequently, sequencing runs produce a large number of short sequences whose exact origin is unknown. Since these sequences are usually smaller than the average length of a gene, algorithms must make predictions based on very little data. RESULTS: We present MetaProdigal, a metagenomic version of the gene prediction program Prodigal, that can identify genes in short, anonymous coding sequences with a high degree of accuracy. The novel value of the method consists of enhanced translation initiation site identification, ability to identify sequences that use alternate genetic codes and confidence values for each gene call. We compare the results of MetaProdigal with other methods and conclude with a discussion of future improvements. AVAILABILITY: The Prodigal software is freely available under the General Public License from http://code.google.com/p/prodigal/.
Authors: Maya Britstein; Giulia Devescovi; Kim M Handley; Assaf Malik; Markus Haber; Kumar Saurav; Roberta Teta; Valeria Costantino; Ilia Burgsdorf; Jack A Gilbert; Noa Sher; Vittorio Venturi; Laura Steindler Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Hila Sberro; Brayon J Fremin; Soumaya Zlitni; Fredrik Edfors; Nicholas Greenfield; Michael P Snyder; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; Nikos C Kyrpides; Ami S Bhatt Journal: Cell Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Ping Hu; Eric A Dubinsky; Alexander J Probst; Jian Wang; Christian M K Sieber; Lauren M Tom; Piero R Gardinali; Jillian F Banfield; Ronald M Atlas; Gary L Andersen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Q Yin; S-C Hung; W K Rathmell; L Shen; L Wang; W Lin; J R Fielding; A H Khandani; M E Woods; M I Milowsky; S A Brooks; E M Wallen; D Shen Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Rebecca A Daly; Mikayla A Borton; Michael J Wilkins; David W Hoyt; Duncan J Kountz; Richard A Wolfe; Susan A Welch; Daniel N Marcus; Ryan V Trexler; Jean D MacRae; Joseph A Krzycki; David R Cole; Paula J Mouser; Kelly C Wrighton Journal: Nat Microbiol Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 17.745
Authors: Cara Magnabosco; Kathleen Ryan; Maggie C Y Lau; Olukayode Kuloyo; Barbara Sherwood Lollar; Thomas L Kieft; Esta van Heerden; Tullis C Onstott Journal: ISME J Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 10.302