| Literature DB >> 32143621 |
Luigui Gallardo-Becerra1, Fernanda Cornejo-Granados1, Rodrigo García-López1, Alejandra Valdez-Lara1, Shirley Bikel1, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros2, Blanca E López-Contreras2, Alfredo Mendoza-Vargas3, Henrik Nielsen4, Adrián Ochoa-Leyva5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, increasing evidence has shown that changes in human gut microbiota are associated with diseases, such as obesity. The excreted/secreted proteins (secretome) of the gut microbiota affect the microbial composition, altering its colonization and persistence. Furthermore, it influences microbiota-host interactions by triggering inflammatory reactions and modulating the host's immune response. The metatranscriptome is essential to elucidate which genes are expressed under diseases. In this regard, little is known about the expressed secretome in the microbiome. Here, we use a metatranscriptomic approach to delineate the secretome of the gut microbiome of Mexican children with normal weight (NW) obesity (O) and obesity with metabolic syndrome (OMS). Additionally, we performed the 16S rRNA profiling of the gut microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: AAR; CAZY; Metabolic syndrome; Metatranscriptome; Metatranscriptomics; Microbiome; Microbiota; Obesity; Secrebiome; Secretome
Year: 2020 PMID: 32143621 PMCID: PMC7060530 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-020-01319-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene profiles. Each panel compares the NW, O, and OMS groups. a Mean Relative abundance of the phyla present in each group. b Mean observed OTUs per sample and group. The averaged total unique OTUs from 10,000 rarefactions per sample are shown as points with overlying boxplots showing the distribution within each group. c Mean Shannon’s entropy per sample and group. The averaged Shannon’s index value from 10,000 rarefactions per sample are shown as points with overlying boxplots showing the distribution within each group. d Principal coordinate analyses of Unweighted UniFrac distances. Elipses were calculated based on the most distant samples per group. Samples for which RNA-seq information is available are presented with a larger font
Fig. 2Differentially abundant taxa in association with groups and their distribution in the samples. Bars show the effect size of taxa that are differentially more abundant in the specified groups after analysis with LEfSe. Those labeled as specific were found significantly more in their groups, whereas the rest are found in pairwise group comparisons. The heatmap shows the abundance of those taxa in the samples with more abundant taxa in yellow
Fig. 3Linear regression and Pearson correlation of LEfSe biomarkers. The title of each graph corresponds to the LEfSe biomarkers taxa. The x-axis shows the value of the clinical and anthropometrical parameters, and the y-axis shows the relative abundance for each taxa
Fig. 4Remapped sequences to the metatranscriptome and Secrebiome. a Proportion of reads remapped to the global metatranscriptome and b proportion of Secrebiome/metatranscriptome remapped by sample. The external samples were taken from BioProjects PRJNA354235 and PRJNA188481
Fig. 5Differentially expressed secretome transcripts. Transcripts significantly associated with either the O or OMS were determined with DESeq after expression signal standardization. The heatmap shows the normalized RSEM abundance of each transcript per sample with a higher abundance in yellow. Bars on the right depict the total fold transcripts detected in association to each group (in log2 scale). The overlying matrix contains the predicted protein name on the left, the putative taxonomic assignation based on an LCA approach on the center, and the associated functional annotation on the right
Fig. 6Ratio of Carbohydrate-Active enzymes (CAZys) in secreted and non-secreted proteins. The bars show the ratio of each CAZy family present in the total set of secreted (green)and non-secreted (blue) proteins. We used multiple t-tests to analyze the significant differences among the different enzyme families
Fig. 7Comparison between the abundance of antigenic regions values (AAR) of secreted and non-secreted proteins in the different groups. The x-axis shows the protein set analyzed, and the Y-axis shows the AAR value obtained for each protein in the dataset. The line shows the mean value for each group. A Mann–Whitney test was performed to compare the AAR within each group with a confidence level of 99% (***p ≤ 0.001)